1.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
2.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
3.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
4.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
5.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
6.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
7.Study of frontal and ethmoid sinus of sinonasal complex along with olfactory fossa: anatomical considerations for endoscopic sinus surgery
Kusum R GANDHI ; Sumit Tulshidas PATIL ; Brijesh KUMAR ; Manmohan PATEL ; Prashant CHAWARE
Anatomy & Cell Biology 2023;56(2):179-184
The Functional endoscopic sinus surgery through transnasal approach is a common modality of treatment for disorders of the nasal cavity, paranasal air sinuses as well as cranial cavity. The olfactory fossa (OF) is located along the superior aspect of cribriform plate which varies in shape and depth. This variable measurement of the depth of OF is mostly responsible for greater risk of intracranial infiltration during endoscopic procedures in and around the nasal cavity. The morphology of frontal and ethmoid sinus (ES) vary from simple to complex. This cadaveric study is planned to improve the ability of the otolaryngologist, radiologist to understand the possible morphological variations and plan steps of less invasive “precision surgery” to have a safe and complication free procedures. A total of 37 human head regions were included in the study. For classification of OF, Modified Kero’s classification was used. The size, shape and cells of frontal and ES were noted.We found, type II (60.8%) OF was more common followed by type I (29.7%) than type III (9.5%). The shape of frontal sinus was comma shaped (55.4%) followed by oval (18.9%) than irregular (16.2%). Most common two cells type of ES was seen in 50.0% of both anterior and posterior ES. Out of 74 ES, 8.1% of Onodi cells and 14.9% of agger nasi cells were seen.
8.Preventable iatrogenic cause of foot-drop in knee injuries with literature review
Anant KRISHNA ; Sumit ARORA ; Rakesh GOYAL ; Manish KUMAR ; Nirup NAIK ; Manoj KUMAR
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2022;25(4):224-231
Purpose::Common peroneal nerve palsy is quite disabling and every effort should be made to prevent its injury during the treatment.Methods::We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data of 7 cases of tibial plateau fractures in association with proximal fibula fracture from January 2019 to September 2019 who presented to emergency room of our hospital.Results::In addition to fibular neck fracture, the first case had type 6 tibial plateau displaced fracture and the second case had displaced acetabular fracture with instability of knee with tibial tuberosity avulsion. common peroneal nerve palsy developed following application of distal tibial skeletal traction in both the cases. Other 6 such cases remained neurologically intact as traction was not applied to them.Conclusion::Such iatrogenic complication could have been prevented if the injury pattern of "concomitant medial and lateral columns" of the proximal leg is kept in mind by the treating surgeon before applying skeletal traction.
9.Pharmaceutical amorphous solid dispersion: A review of manufacturing strategies.
Sonal V BHUJBAL ; Biplob MITRA ; Uday JAIN ; Yuchuan GONG ; Anjali AGRAWAL ; Shyam KARKI ; Lynne S TAYLOR ; Sumit KUMAR ; Qi TONY ZHOU
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2021;11(8):2505-2536
Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are popular for enhancing the solubility and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Various approaches have been employed to produce ASDs and novel techniques are emerging. This review provides an updated overview of manufacturing techniques for preparing ASDs. As physical stability is a critical quality attribute for ASD, the impact of formulation, equipment, and process variables, together with the downstream processing on physical stability of ASDs have been discussed. Selection strategies are proposed to identify suitable manufacturing methods, which may aid in the development of ASDs with satisfactory physical stability.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail