Purpose: To compare the myopic progression between pateints only wearing glasses (Myopia group) and patients using low-dose atropine with glasses (Atropine group) for 1 years or more. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Low-dose atropine (atropine sulfate 0.125%) and artificial tear eyedrops (sodium hyaluronate 0.1%) were applied immediately afterwards to both eyes daily to the Atropine group. All children regularly visited our clinic for measurement of refractive power, axial length, near-point accomodation, pupil diameter, symptoms (glare, near-work disturbance, headache, allergic reaction, dryness) were recorded. Results: A total of 240 patients were included. Atropine was prescribed for 138 patients, the Atropine group, and the remaining 102 patients constituted the Myopia group, and were observed for 20.3 ± 7.8 months. In the initial visit, the mean refractive power was -4.2 ± 1.4 diopters (D) for the Myopia group, -4.8 ± 1.9 D for the Atropine group, and the mean axial length was 24.5 ± 0.6 mm for the Myopia group, 25.1 ± 0.9 mm for the Atropine group. During follow up, in the Myopia group, mean refractive power changed -0.10 ± 0.12 D/month, and mean axial length changed 0.06 ± 0.01 mm/month. In the Atropine group, mean refractive power changed -0.03 ± 0.04 D/month, and mean axial length changed 0.02 ± 0.02 mm/month. The pupil size of the Atropine group was 6.1 ± 0.8 mm, with 30 patients presenting symptoms. Conclusions Refractive power progression and axial length elongation was significantly lesser in the Atropine group than the Myopic group. Pupil diameter increased in the Atropine group, and 21% of the Atropine group complained of symptoms. Using low-dose atropine for more than 1 year was effective to suppress refractive power progression and axial length elongation.

Cellular senescence causes cell cycle arrest and promotes permanent cessation of proliferation. Since the senescence of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) reduces proliferation and multipotency and increases immunogenicity, aged MSCs are not suitable for cell therapy. Therefore, it is important to inhibit cellular senescence in MSCs. It has recently been reported that metabolites can control aging diseases. Therefore, we aimed to identify novel metabolites that regulate the replicative senescence in MSCs. Using a fecal metabolites library, we identified nervonic acid (NA) as a candidate metabolite for replicative senescence regulation. In replicative senescent MSCs, NA reduced senescence-associated β-galactosidase positive cells, the expression of senescence-related genes, as well as increased stemness and adipogenesis. Moreover, in non-senescent MSCs, NA treatment delayed senescence caused by sequential subculture and promoted proliferation. We confirmed, for the first time, that NA delayed and inhibited cellular senescence.Considering optimal concentration, duration, and timing of drug treatment, NA is a novel potential metabolite that can be used in the development of technologies that regulate cellular senescence.

Purpose: For the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), research on primary lesions with mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement is lacking. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and efficacy of dose-escalated neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to patients with LARC involving MRF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 301 patients who were diagnosed with LARC involving MRF and underwent NCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≤50.4 Gy were defined as the non-boost group, while ≥54.0 Gy as the boost group. Pathological tumor response and survival outcomes, including intrapelvic recurrence-free survival (IPRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. Results: A total of 269 patients (89.4%) achieved a negative pathological circumferential resection margin and 104 (34.6%) had good pathological tumor regression grades. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, IPRFS, DMFS, and OS rates at 5-years were 88.6%, 78.0%, and 91.2%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by RT dose, the boost group included more advanced clinical stages of patients. For the non-boost group and boost group, 5-year IPRFS rates were 90.3% and 87.0% (p = 0.242), 5-year DMFS rates were 82.0% and 71.3% (p = 0.105), and 5-year OS rates were 93.0% and 80.6% (p = 0.439), respectively. Treatment related toxicity was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.211). Conclusion Although this retrospective study failed to confirm the efficacy of dose-escalated NCRT, favorable IPRFS and pathological complete response was achieved with NCRT followed by TME. Further studies combining patient customized RT dose with systemic therapies are needed.

Purpose: To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with refractive accommodative esotropia (RAET) and infantile esotropia (IET). Methods: The medical records of patients with RAET and IET who were followed-up for more than 36 months were retrospectively analyzed. The RAET patients were prescribed spectacles to correct cycloplegic refraction and those with IET underwent bilateral, medial rectus recession. Visual acuity, refraction, the angle of esodeviation at far and near distances, and near-stereopsis were measured at each visit. The IET patients were divided into two groups by the time of surgery (before and after 24 months of age). Patients in both groups who underwent reoperations after diagnosis of partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) and recurrent IET during follow-up were analyzed. Results: Sixty-nine patients (40 with RAET and 29 with IET) were included. The follow-up period was 69.48 ± 28.41 months. At the final visit, the angles of esodeviation were 2.82 ± 5.46 prism diopters (PD) in the RAET group and 9.28 ± 8.37 PD in the IET group (p < 0.01). In IET patients who underwent surgery before and after 24 months of age, the angles of esodeviation were 4.62 ± 5.25 and 13.06 ± 8.63 PD and the median near-stereopsis values 60 and 140 arcsec at the final visit (p < 0.01, 0.03). Seven patients (17.5%) in the RAET group, and 2 (15.4%) and 10 (62.5%) IET patients who underwent surgery before and after 24 months of age, required reoperations (p < 0.01). Conclusions RAET and IET patients who underwent surgery before 24 months of age exhibited better alignment and stereopsis at the final visit than those who underwent later surgery and the reoperation rate was lower.

Background/Aims: Fexuprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that could be of benefit to patients with gastric mucosal injury. The aim of this study was to assess the 2-week efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with acute or chronic gastritis. Methods: In this study, 327 patients with acute or chronic gastritis who had one or more gastric erosions on endoscopy and subjective symptoms were randomized into three groups receiving fexuprazan 20 mg once a day (q.d.), fexuprazan 10 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), or placebo for 2 weeks. The posttreatment assessments were the primary endpoint (erosion improvement rate), secondary endpoints (cure rates of erosion and edema and improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and subjective symptoms), and drug-related adverse events. Results: Among the patients, 57.8% (59/102), 65.7% (67/102), and 40.6% (39/96) showed erosion improvement 2 weeks after receiving fexuprazan 20 mg q.d., fexuprazan 10 mg b.i.d., and placebo, respectively. Both fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. showed superior efficacy to the placebo (p=0.017 and p<0.001, respectively). Likewise, both fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. also showed higher erosion healing rates than the placebo (p=0.033 and p=0.010, respectively). No difference was noted in the edema healing rate and the improvement rates for redness, hemorrhage, and subjective symptoms between the fexuprazan and placebo groups.No significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Conclusions Fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks showed therapeutic efficacy superior to that of placebo in patients with acute or chronic gastritis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04341454).

Purpose: We analyzed the effects of low-dose atropine on myopic progression in elementary schoolchildren aged 6-11 years. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed before and after 6 months of low-dose atropine eyedrops. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent < -1 diopter. Low-dose atropine eyedrops (atropine sulfate 0.125% [w/v]) and artificial tear eyedrops (sodium hyaluronate 0.1% [w/v]) immediately afterwards were applied to both eyes daily, and all children regularly visited us for measurement of refractive power, axial length, pupil diameter, and near-point accommodation. symptoms (headache, light sensitivity, near-work disturbance, allergic reaction, dry eye, and poor night vision) were recorded. Results: A total of 116 patients were included. Atropine was prescribed for 65 patients, the remaining 51 patients constituted the control group. In the atropine group, the mean age was 10.2 ± 1.8 years and 23 patients (35.4%) were male. At the initial visit, the mean refractive power was -4.7 ± 2.1 diopters (D) (-1.0 to -10.5) and the mean axial length was 24.95 ± 1.02 mm (22.58-27.99). At the 6-month follow-up, the change of refractive power was -0.9 ± 1.1 D (-0.75 to -4.75) and the change of axial length was 0.47 ± 0.39 mm (0.01-1.6). However, 6 months after application of low-dose atropine eyedrops, the change of refractive power was -0.1 ± 0.2 D (0 to -0.25) and the change of mean axial length was 0.15 ± 0.23 mm (0-1.05). The mean pupil diameter was 6.7 ± 0.6 mm (5.3-9.3) and the near accommodation point was 6.1 ± 2.0 cm (3.1-11.0). Two patients (3.1%) complained of near-work disturbance but none stopped taking the eyedrops. Conclusions Significant decreases in the changes of refractive power and axial length were evident in myopic elementary schoolchildren after low-dose atropine therapy. Low-dose atropine attenuates myopic progression without severe complications.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of classroom illuminance on the development and progression of myopia in elementary school children. Methods: The daylight factor, a ratio of inside and outside illuminance, was obtained in 50 elementary schools. The firstgrade students in the school with the lowest daylight (LD) factor (LD school, 145 subjects; 0.51%) and with the highest daylight (HD) factor (HD school, 147 subjects; 13.35%) were selected. A survey was conducted to evaluate parental myopia, the amount of near-work and outdoor activities. The refractive error and axial length (AL) were measured at initial and after 6 months. The spherical equivalent, AL, and the survey results were compared between the two schools. The mean AL of the emmetropic children was obtained, and all subjects were divided into two groups, more and less than mean AL. Changes in refractive errors and AL were also compared according to AL. Results: The amount of change in spherical equivalent and AL after 6 months were not different between the two schools. Initial prevalence of myopia was high in the HD school. However, it became similar between the two schools after 6 months. The mean AL of 155 emmetropic children was 22.7 ± 0.63 mm. In the 185 children with AL ≥22.7 mm, there was no difference in the AL change between the two schools. However, the change in AL in 107 children with AL <22.7 mm was significantly larger in the LD school (0.19 mm) than that in the HD school (0.15 mm, p = 0.049). Parental myopia, near-work and outdoor activities were not different between the two schools. Conclusions High classroom illuminance during the day reduced axial elongation in eyes of children with a shorter AL. Increase in classroom light level by permitting more sunlight can be a protective measure against the development of myopia.

Background: and Purpose: Blood pressure (BP) control is strongly recommended, but BP control rate has not been well studied in patients with stroke. We evaluated the BP control rate with fimasartan-based antihypertensive therapy initiated in patients with recent cerebral ischemia. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm trial involved 27 centers in South Korea. Key inclusion criteria were recent cerebral ischemia within 90 days and high BP [systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg]. BP lowering was initiated with fimasartan. BP management during the follow-up was at the discretion of the responsible investigators. The primary endpoint was the target BP goal achievement rate (<140/90 mm Hg) at 24 weeks. Key secondary endpoints included achieved BP and BP changes at each visit, and clinical events (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03231293). Results: Of 1,035 patients enrolled, 1,026 were included in the safety analysis, and 951 in the efficacy analysis. Their mean age was 64.1 years, 33% were female, the median time interval from onset to enrollment was 10 days, and the baseline SBP and DBP were 162.3±16.0 and 92.2±12.4 mm Hg (mean±SD). During the study period, 55.5% of patients were maintained on fimasartan monotherapy, and 44.5% received antihypertensive therapies other than fimasartan monotherapy at at least one visit. The target BP goal achievement rate at 24-week was 67.3% (48.6% at 4-week and 61.4% at 12-week). The mean BP was 139.0/81.8±18.3/11.7, 133.8/79.2±16.4/11.0, and 132.8/78.5±15.6/10.9 mm Hg at 4-, 12-, and 24-week. The treatment-emergent adverse event rate was 5.4%, including one serious adverse event. Conclusions Fimasartan-based BP lowering achieved the target BP in two-thirds of patients at 24 weeks, and was generally well tolerated.

Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the factors influencing the posttraumatic growth (PTG) in patients with lung cancer and to provide basic data for nursing intervention development to improve PTG and adaptation. Methods: The study included 126 non-small cell lung cancer patients initially diagnosed at the Lung Cancer Center, C University Hospital in S city, Gyeonggi-do. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, posttraumatic growth, cancer coping, social support, and resilience. Data were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation and multiple regression analysis. Results: The mean score for PTG in lung cancer patients was 56.39, cancer coping was 61.31, social support was 61.09, and resilience was 92.77. Significant positive correlations were found for PTG and cancer coping (r=.75, p<.001), social support (r=.52, p<.001) and resilience (r=.63, p<.001). Factors contributing to PTG of lung cancer patients were cancer coping (β=.53 p<.001), perceived health status(β=.20, p=.002), resilience (β=.21, p=.010) and importance of religion (β=.15, p=.013). This model explained about 64.0% of variances of PTG (F=29.58, p<.001). Conclusion It is necessary to develop new nursing intervention programs to improve PTG for patients with lung cancer based on strategies to enhance coping and resilience to recovery. Longitudinal studies examining temporal changes in PTG among patients with lung cancer are suggested for future studies in this regard.

Purpose: Clinical factors affecting the recovery period in patients with vascular or idiopathic paralytic strabismus were evaluated. Methods: This study involved a retrospective review of medical records of patients diagnosed with vascular and idiopathic acquired paralytic strabismus. Vascular paralysis was defined in cases of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease. The angle of deviation and limitation of extraocular movement were evaluated at each visit. Recovery was defined as the absence of diplopia and complete resolution of limitation of extraocular movement. Factors affecting recovery success and recovery period were analyzed. Results: We retrospectively reviewed data of 145 patients consisting of 87 with vascular paralytic strabismus (cranial nerve [CN] III: 21, CN IV: 28, CN VI: 38) and 58 with idiopathic paralytic strabismus (CN IV: 20, CN VI: 24, CN III: 14). The recovery rate did not significantly differ between vascular (60.9%) and idiopathic (63.8%) groups (p = 0.15). The recovery period was longer in the vascular group (130.1 ± 145.1 days) than in the idiopathic group (92.6 ± 76.6) (p = 0.02). Age at onset was significantly associated with the recovery period in both vascular and idiopathic groups. In the vascular group, the recovery periods were 107.4 ± 74.8 days in CN III palsy, 97.2 ± 51.9 days in CN IV palsy, and 159.3 ± 194.1 days in CN VI palsy. The recovery period was significantly longer in patients with CN VI palsy (p = 0.03). Hypertension was significantly influencing the recovery period in patients with vascular CN VI palsy (odds ratio = 2.54, p = 0.01). Conclusions The recovery period was longer in patients with vascular paralytic strabismus than in patients with idiopathic paralytic strabismus. Recovery rates were not significantly different between groups. In patients with vascular CN VI palsy, a history of hypertension was significantly associated with the recovery period.