Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Background: Quadratus lumborum (QL) block is used for multimodal analgesia following abdominal surgery. We introduced an ultrasound-guided QL block to treat postoperative pain for ileostomy closure. This study aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the QL block compared to placebo after ileostomy closure. Methods: Fifty-seven patients undergoing elective ileostomy closure were randomized (1:1) to the placebo or QL block group in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. After general anesthesia, a unilateral QL block was performed under ultrasound guidance. Opioid consumption and numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10) pain scores were recorded at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was the NRS pain score at rest at 6 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, rescue analgesics over 72 hours, Quality of Recovery-15 scores in 24 hours, complications, and length of hospital stay. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the 54 patients (27 per group) who completed the study, excluding three who dropped out. The QL block did not reduce NRS pain scores at rest at 6 hours (median [interquartile range], 5 [4–6] vs. 5 [3–6]; p=0.78). Over the 72-hour postoperative period, pain scores at rest remained comparable between the groups, while the QL group showed slightly lower movement-induced pain at certain time points. The QL group required fewer analgesics and antiemetics at certain intervals, but the total opioid use, length of hospital stay, and quality of recovery were not significantly different. Conclusion The QL block showed no meaningful advantage in postoperative analgesia compared to placebo for ileostomy closures.

Background: The heterogeneity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and fragmented analysis methods hinder the precise identification of novel biomarkers. We addressed this challenge using two independent cohorts to integrate genomics and metabolomics, aiming to identify cause-specific biomarkers for CKD in the Korean population. Methods: A longitudinal genome-wide association study using the Cox proportional hazards model was conducted using the Ansan and Ansung cohort. To validate these genomic biomarkers and integrate them with plasma metabolomics biomarkers, we utilized a hospital-based biopsy cohort to identify cause-specific CKD biomarkers. Within the biopsy cohort, we analyzed four disease subsets, including type 2 diabetic kidney disease (DKD), hypertensive nephropathy (HN), immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), and membranous nephropathy (MN), and compared them with healthy individuals. Significant single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) and metabolites for each CKD subset were identified through logistic regression and correlation-based network analyses. Subsequently, we analyzed the risk of disease progression associated with the identified pairs. Results: A total of 448 variants associated with CKD occurrence were identified, with significant differences in several genetic variants and metabolites observed among patients with DKD, HN, IgAN, and MN compared to healthy individuals. Among 36 SNP-metabolite pairs, those involing FOXB1 and ZFP42 were associated with DKD, whereas pairs involving MMRN1 and SYNJ2 were linked to MN. Notably, the rs1025170 variant in FOXB1 and tyrosine pair was correlated with DKD progression. Conclusion Integrating genomics and metabolomics across independent cohorts enables the discovery of cause-specific biomarkers for the occurrence and progression of CKD in the Korean population.

Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a critical complication related to worse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Herein, we addressed the impact of IDH on mortality and other outcomes in patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring intermittent hemodialysis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,009 patients who underwent intermittent hemodialysis due to severe AKI. IDH was defined as either dialysis discontinuation due to hemodynamic instability or a decrease in systolic blood pressure (BP) of ≥30 mmHg, with or without a nadir systolic BP of <90 mmHg during the first session. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to unstable status was additionally analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) of outcomes were calculated using a Cox regression model after adjusting for multiple variables. Risk factors for IDH were evaluated using a logistic regression model. Results: IDH occurred in 449 patients (44.5%) during the first hemodialysis session. Patients with IDH had a higher mortality rate than those without IDH (40% vs. 23%; HR, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.65). The rate of ICU transfer was higher in patients experiencing IDH than in those without IDH (17% vs. 11%; HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02–2.02). Factors such as old age, high BP and pulse rate, active malignancy, cirrhosis, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with an increased risk of IDH episodes. Conclusion The occurrence of IDH is associated with worse outcomes in patients with AKI requiring intermittent hemodialysis. Therefore, careful monitoring and early intervention of IDH may be necessary in this patient subset.

Background: The effects of propofol, a commonly used intravenous anesthetic, on the breast cancer tumor microenvironment are not well understood. This study examined the influence of propofol on natural killer group 2, member D (NKG2D) ligand expression, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-mediated immune evasion, and natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells. Methods: We studied three human breast cancer cell lines representing distinct receptor subtypes: MCF-7 (estrogen receptor - and progesterone receptor-positive), MDA-MB-453 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive), and HCC-70 (triple-negative). Cells were treated with propofol at concentrations of 0 μg/ml (control; C), 4 μg/ml (P4), or 8 μg/ml (P8). Assessments included mRNA and protein expression of NKG2D ligands, NK cell cytotoxicity, protein levels of MMP-1 and MMP-2, and concentrations of soluble NKG2D ligands. Results: In MCF-7 and HCC-70 cell lines, propofol upregulated the mRNA and protein expression of NKG2D ligands in a dose-dependent manner, enhancing NK cell-mediated lysis. In contrast, in MDA-MB-453 cell lines, propofol downregulated the mRNA and protein expression of NKG2D ligands, resulting in diminished NK cell-mediated lysis. Across all receptor subtypes, propofol did not affect the expression of MMP-1 or MMP-2 or the concentration of soluble NKG2D ligands. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that propofol exerts receptor subtype-dependent effects on NK cell-mediated immunosurveillance in breast cancer cell lines, potentially mediated by changes in the transcription of NKG2D ligands rather than by alterations in MMP expression or their proteolytic activity.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is prevalent among adults, many of whom require surgical interventions. Although metformin may improve postoperative outcomes by reducing inflammation, its effects on postoperative mortality and complications remain unclear. This study aimed to determine whether preoperative metformin use is associated with improved postoperative outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with type 2 DM who underwent noncardiac surgery between 2011 and 2019. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the use of preoperative metformin at admission. To evaluate dose-related effects, patients in the metformin group were further divided into low- and high-dose groups based on daily dose (< or ≥ 1,000 mg). The primary outcome was one-year mortality after surgery, and the secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, five-year mortality, and postoperative complications in major organs within 7 d. Results: Among 22 944 patients, 12 536 (54.6%) were exposed to preoperative metformin. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, preoperative metformin use was associated with a reduced one-year mortality (hazard ratio: 0.76, 95% CI [0.68–0.85]). For secondary outcomes, metformin use decreased postoperative complications in respiratory (odds ratio [OR]: 0.76, 95% CI [0.61−0.93]) and renal systems (OR: 0.66, 95% CI [0.58−0.74]). In a dose-related analysis, both doses were associated with a lower risk of postoperative mortality, with reductions in respiratory complications primarily due to high-dose metformin (OR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.54−0.89]). Conclusion Preoperative use of metformin is associated with reduced postoperative mortality and complications in diabetic patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Purpose: Atypical hyperplasia (AH) management remains controversial due to variable malignant disease progression rates. While Western studies report 10% to 25% upgrade rates, data from Asian populations, particularly from referral academic centers, are limited. We aimed to identify predictive factors for malignant upgrade in Korean women with AH at academic hospitals. Methods: This retrospective multi-institutional study analyzed 340 patients diagnosed with AH on initial biopsy who underwent subsequent excision at five Korean academic hospitals from 2000 to 2022. Malignant upgrade was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer on the final pathology. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of upgrades. Results: Among 340 patients (319 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 20 atypical lobular hyperplasia, and 1 mixed), 128 (37.6%) experienced a malignant upgrade, 98 (76.6%) to ductal carcinoma in situ, and 30 (23.4%) to invasive cancer. In multivariate analysis, multifocal atypia (odds ratio [OR], 25.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.20–58.55; P<0.001) and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4c-5 lesions (OR, 11.02; 95% CI, 1.43–84.86; P=0.021) were significant predictors. Multifocal atypia showed an 84.4% upgrade rate. Core needle biopsy had higher upgrade rates than vacuum-assisted biopsy (45.2% vs. 20.0%; P<0.001). The upgrade rates decreased from 50% to 25% over the study period (P<0.05). Conclusion The 37.6% upgrade rate in this tertiary referral cohort exceeded that in Western reports, with multifocal atypia emerging as the strongest predictor. These findings support immediate excision for multifocal atypia while allowing individualized management for unifocal lesions with favorable imaging in Korean tertiary care settings.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare immune-mediated disorder in children that can present as primary or secondary to other diseases. Here, we report an unusual case of steroid-refractory warm AIHA in an 11-year-old girl whose condition was ultimately cured after removal of a benign ovarian tumor. Despite receiving multiple lines of therapy—including corticosteroids, rituximab, cyclosporine, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil—the patient experienced recurrent hemolysis and steroid dependence for nearly four years. Abdominopelvic imaging performed to evaluate fever revealed bilateral ovarian cystic lesions, including a left-sided dermoid cyst. Surgical resection of the tumor led to complete and sustained hematologic remission, with normalization of hemoglobin, bilirubin, and reticulocyte counts, allowing discontinuation of all immunosuppressive agents. No recurrence of hemolysis was observed during 18 months of follow-up. This case highlights the potential for benign ovarian tumors to act as a rare secondary cause of AIHA through paraneoplastic or immune cross-reactive mechanisms. Awareness of such associations is crucial when evaluating pediatric patients with refractory or relapsing AIHA, as identification and removal of an occult tumor may achieve definitive resolution of hemolysis and avoid long-term immunosuppression.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a stroke subtype with high mortality and poor functional outcomes. Prompt occlusion of a ruptured aneurysm at an early stage is crucial to prevent rebleeding, which can result in even higher mortality and more severe disabilities. The most critical initial decision in SAH management is the choice of treatment method with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. We aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical guideline to select the optimal initial treatment in patients with SAH. We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer two population, intervention, comparison, outcome questions comparing clipping and coiling. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcome and mortality. We included six randomized control trials (RCTs) and 58 observational studies. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed that coiling improved functional outcomes compared to clipping (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–0.97). No significant mortality difference was observed in RCTs (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.91–2.09), but non-RCTs favored clipping for reduced mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69–0.86). However, it is difficult to generalize these findings to all clinical situations, as patients with SAH have a highly variable clinical course. Final treatment decision should be tailored to the individual patient’s status, including aneurysm location, morphology, and the expertise available at the treatment center. Such decisions are best made by specialists such as a board-certified physician and should be explained to the patient and their caregivers, along with the rationale for selecting the most appropriate treatment at the given hospital. Korea has many certified endovascular neurosurgeons, cerebrovascular surgeons, and certified cerebrovascular centers. Proper selection of the most suitable treatment method by certified physicians and centers would greatly benefit patient outcomes and healthcare professionals.

Accurate and early identification of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in emergency settings is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring the efficient allocation of medical resources. This clinical practice guideline systematically reviews domestic and international literature and conducts meta-analyses to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of stroke assessment tools used in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). We developed a guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of diagnostic EMS assessment tools for diagnosing stroke and LVO. Overall, 70 non-randomized control studies were selected for this study. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup analysis to distinguish between patients with stroke and those with LVO. EMS tools demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing stroke. In the prehospital setting, using validated EMS stroke assessment tools is recommended for the early identification of stroke and LVO. Upon hospital arrival, stroke specialists should conduct further evaluation and triage to confirm the diagnosis and guide appropriate management. Delays in diagnosing LVO are frequently unacceptable. While experts advocate for the use of EMS assessment tools to facilitate early identification of LVO, these tools alone lack adequate sensitivity. Therefore, further diagnostic evaluations and consultation with stroke specialists upon hospital arrival are recommended.