OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had direct effects on population health through infection and morbidity, as well as indirect effects on population mental health. We estimated the network structure of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and depressive symptoms throughout the pandemic in Korea and aimed to identify the most central and bridging symptoms. METHODS: Participants aged 30–64 years completed mental health surveys across 3 phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: March 2020 (n=1,925), February–March 2021 (n=1,754), and December 2021–January 2022 (n=1,595). Using PTSS and depressive symptom data, we conducted network analyses, and the primary measures of symptom importance (centrality) were expected influence and bridge expected influence. RESULTS: In the comorbidity network, although the most central symptoms fluctuated over the course of the pandemic, sleep problems were consistently identified as the most influential bridge symptoms throughout. The symptom network structure differed between the subacute and chronic phases of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence of changes in the network structure of PTSS and depressive symptoms, even as sleep problems retained a consistent role as a bridging symptom. Although overall network structures varied across phases of the pandemic, the bridging role of sleep-related symptoms remained consistently strong, suggesting that sleep problems may represent a general and enduring mechanism underlying PTSS–depression comorbidity. During future pandemics, prompt screening for sleep problems may help prevent the development of comorbidity between PTSS and depressive symptoms.

Background: Excessive consumption of high-fat diet (HFD) can easily cause obesity, hyperlipidemia, and fatty liver disease. Persistent elevation of blood lipid levels increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, with hyperlipidemia being a well-established risk factor. Gastrodia elata Blume (GEB) is a perennial orchid plant that is known to have beneficial effects on obesity and blood circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of GEB extract on improving blood lipids in the hyperlipidemia model induced by HFD in rats. Wistar rats (five-week-old) were divided into 3 groups: Control (CON) group, HFD induced (HF) group, and GEB treated (GEB) group. Results: The treatment of GEB extract reduced body weight gain, visceral fat, and epididymal fat weights. Serum total cholesterol (TC) levels were significantly lower in the GEB group than in the HF group. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were reduced in the GEB group than in the HF group. Histopathological analysis of the liver showed that the GEB group alleviated structural damage to the liver by reducing lipid accumulation in hepatocytes compared with the HF group in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Oil red O staining. The adipocyte diameter was smaller in the GEB group than in the HF group, and the atherosclerosis index (AI) was significantly lower in the GEB group compared to the HF group. Furthermore, the mechanism underlying these effects was elucidated by demonstrating that GEB extract decreased the expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1), a key regulator of cholesterol synthesis in the liver. Conclusions These results indicate that GEB extract has the effect of improving blood and liver lipid levels.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed the data of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who had transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy and experienced recurrence. From the data, the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of recurrent OPSCC were evaluated, and the predictive factors related to successful salvage treatment were identified.Subjects and Method We used data from patients who were diagnosed with OPSCC and received transoral surgery at the hospital from January 2005 to December 2019. Results: The 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrent OPSCC was 43.9%. The predictors of successful salvage treatment were adjuvant therapy and the p16 status. The 5-year survival rate following salvage treatment for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and also tested p16-positive was 64%; however, it was only 30% for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and tested p16-negative. The 5-year survival rate was 22% for patients who received adjuvant therapy and 64% for those who did not receive it. Conclusion In OPSCC patients who recurred after transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy, the salvage treatment success rate was 45%. In recurrent cancer, the HPV status was an important factor associated with successful salvage treatment, as the success rate of salvage treatment was remarkably high in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Thus, we verified that it is crucial to conduct an initial surgery with clear margins and determine the optimal criteria for adjuvant therapy.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed the data of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who had transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy and experienced recurrence. From the data, the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of recurrent OPSCC were evaluated, and the predictive factors related to successful salvage treatment were identified.Subjects and Method We used data from patients who were diagnosed with OPSCC and received transoral surgery at the hospital from January 2005 to December 2019. Results: The 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrent OPSCC was 43.9%. The predictors of successful salvage treatment were adjuvant therapy and the p16 status. The 5-year survival rate following salvage treatment for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and also tested p16-positive was 64%; however, it was only 30% for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and tested p16-negative. The 5-year survival rate was 22% for patients who received adjuvant therapy and 64% for those who did not receive it. Conclusion In OPSCC patients who recurred after transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy, the salvage treatment success rate was 45%. In recurrent cancer, the HPV status was an important factor associated with successful salvage treatment, as the success rate of salvage treatment was remarkably high in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Thus, we verified that it is crucial to conduct an initial surgery with clear margins and determine the optimal criteria for adjuvant therapy.

Esophageal perforation can lead to serious complications, and rapid diagnosis and treatment significantly affect the prognosis. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EndoVAC) therapy is widely accepted as a safe, well-tolerated, effective, versatile and practical procedure for the management of esophageal perforation in selected patients. We report the successful use of EndoVAC therapy for management of an esophageal perforation secondary to foreign body removal. A 56-year-old man presented to the emergency department for evaluation of chest pain after swallowing the plastic shell of a pill. Emergency endoscopy revealed an esophageal wall laceration (approximately 3 cm) and microperforation. The esophageal laceration and microperforation were limited to the mid-esophagus. The patient underwent EndoVAC therapy, which was repeated every 3–4 days for a total of six sessions over a period of 21 days. We observed improvement in the esophageal injury with granulation tissue formation during the fifth session. Subsequent follow-up evaluation, including esophagography and chest computed tomography confirmed complete healing of the esophageal injury. Following resumption of diet, the patienton a was discharged without any complications.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed the data of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who had transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy and experienced recurrence. From the data, the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of recurrent OPSCC were evaluated, and the predictive factors related to successful salvage treatment were identified.Subjects and Method We used data from patients who were diagnosed with OPSCC and received transoral surgery at the hospital from January 2005 to December 2019. Results: The 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrent OPSCC was 43.9%. The predictors of successful salvage treatment were adjuvant therapy and the p16 status. The 5-year survival rate following salvage treatment for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and also tested p16-positive was 64%; however, it was only 30% for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and tested p16-negative. The 5-year survival rate was 22% for patients who received adjuvant therapy and 64% for those who did not receive it. Conclusion In OPSCC patients who recurred after transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy, the salvage treatment success rate was 45%. In recurrent cancer, the HPV status was an important factor associated with successful salvage treatment, as the success rate of salvage treatment was remarkably high in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Thus, we verified that it is crucial to conduct an initial surgery with clear margins and determine the optimal criteria for adjuvant therapy.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed the data of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who had transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy and experienced recurrence. From the data, the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of recurrent OPSCC were evaluated, and the predictive factors related to successful salvage treatment were identified.Subjects and Method We used data from patients who were diagnosed with OPSCC and received transoral surgery at the hospital from January 2005 to December 2019. Results: The 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrent OPSCC was 43.9%. The predictors of successful salvage treatment were adjuvant therapy and the p16 status. The 5-year survival rate following salvage treatment for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and also tested p16-positive was 64%; however, it was only 30% for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and tested p16-negative. The 5-year survival rate was 22% for patients who received adjuvant therapy and 64% for those who did not receive it. Conclusion In OPSCC patients who recurred after transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy, the salvage treatment success rate was 45%. In recurrent cancer, the HPV status was an important factor associated with successful salvage treatment, as the success rate of salvage treatment was remarkably high in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Thus, we verified that it is crucial to conduct an initial surgery with clear margins and determine the optimal criteria for adjuvant therapy.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed the data of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who had transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy and experienced recurrence. From the data, the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of recurrent OPSCC were evaluated, and the predictive factors related to successful salvage treatment were identified.Subjects and Method We used data from patients who were diagnosed with OPSCC and received transoral surgery at the hospital from January 2005 to December 2019. Results: The 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrent OPSCC was 43.9%. The predictors of successful salvage treatment were adjuvant therapy and the p16 status. The 5-year survival rate following salvage treatment for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and also tested p16-positive was 64%; however, it was only 30% for patients who had recurrent OPSCC and tested p16-negative. The 5-year survival rate was 22% for patients who received adjuvant therapy and 64% for those who did not receive it. Conclusion In OPSCC patients who recurred after transoral surgery with/without adjuvant therapy, the salvage treatment success rate was 45%. In recurrent cancer, the HPV status was an important factor associated with successful salvage treatment, as the success rate of salvage treatment was remarkably high in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Thus, we verified that it is crucial to conduct an initial surgery with clear margins and determine the optimal criteria for adjuvant therapy.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.