Lymphatic malformations (LMs) are one of the more commonly encountered cystic head-and-neck tumors. Surgical excision is the traditional treatment with inherent perioperative risks. Alternative treatment of these tumors using percutaneous sclerotherapy agents has been proposed with no major consensus on the treatment approaches and sclerotherapy agent choices. This paper presents a systematic review of percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy for neck lymphangioma and a case report of ethanol ablation in a patient with neck lymphangioma with good cosmesis results. Systematic review was conducted on PubMed using key words: “Ethanol” OR “Alcohol” AND “Ablation” OR “Sclerotherapy” OR “Sclerosing” AND “Lymphangioma” OR “Lymphatic Malformation” as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Three hundred fifteen articles from initial PubMed search results were screened by titles and abstracts. Full text was retrieved. 3 studies were included in our systematic review. Overall evidence quality is modest with marked heterogeneity. All 12 patients treated with percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy for head-and-neck LMs reported favorable response. Only 1 patient (8.3%) encountered a peri-procedural complication. Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy of neck lymphangioma in our patient also reported favorable response with no complications. Invasive treatment for LMs should be personalized and dependent on the availability of experienced operators/ centers with appropriate volume in either primary excisional surgery or percutaneous sclerotherapy. Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy is an acceptable option with benefits of widespread availability and cost-effectiveness in our South-East Asia region. Limitations of our review are largely due to significant study heterogeneity.

INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation may benefit older patients undergoing major surgeries. Currently, its efficacy has not been conclusively proven. This is a retrospective review of a multimodal prehabilitation programme. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years and above undergoing major abdominal surgery between May 2015 and December 2019 in the National University Hospital were included in our institutional programme that incorporated aspects of multimodal prehabilitation and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts as 1 holistic perioperative pathway to deal with issues specific to older patients. Physical therapy, nutritional advice and psychosocial support were provided as part of prehabilitation. RESULTS: There were 335 patients in the prehabilitation cohort and 256 patients whose records were reviewed as control. No difference in postoperative length of stay ( CONCLUSION The current study found no differences in traditional surgical outcome measures with and without prehabilitation. An increase in patient mobility in the immediate postoperative period was noted with prehabilitation, as well as an association between prehabilitation and increased adherence to postoperative adjuvant therapy. Larger prospective studies will be needed to validate the findings of this retrospective review.
Humans ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Preoperative Care ; Preoperative Exercise ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies