Background and Objectives: Cardiac arrhythmia is highly prevalent in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but its relation to genotype has not been well established.We investigated the arrhythmia manifestations according to genotype in HCM patients. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 119 patients with HCM who underwent genetic testing using a next-generation sequencing panel. Incidence of cardiac arrhythmias and long-term outcomes were analyzed according to the presence of pathogenic variants (PVs). Results: PVs related to HCM were identified in 45 (37.8%) patients. Presentation of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) prior to HCM diagnosis was more prevalent in the PV-positive group. During a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the incidence of sustained VT was significantly higher in the PV-positive group (11.1% vs. 1.4%, hazard ratio, 8.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–74.61). A new implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion rate was comparable in the 2 groups, but appropriate shocks were delivered in only 4 patients in the PV-positive group (8.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.037). Incidence of bradyarrhythmias requiring pacemaker and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Among 56 patients with AF, there was no significant difference in treatment strategies in the 2 groups. However, sinus rhythm was maintained over the last 6 months of follow-up in 4/17 (23.5%) patients in the PV-positive group and 24/39 (61.5%) patients in the PV-negative group (P = 0.031). Conclusions Patients with PVs related to HCM exhibited higher incidence of life-threatening VTs. While overall AF incidence was similar between the groups, the presence of PVs was significantly associated with poorer rhythm outcomes of AF.

The impact of Streptococcus pneumoniae coinfection on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prognosis remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent a pneumococcal urinary antigen (PUA) test to assess its clinical utility. Results showed that PUA-positive patients required more oxygen support, high-flow nasal cannula, and dexamethasone compared to PUA-negative patients.Furthermore, the significantly higher incidence of a National Early Warning Score ≥5 in the PUA-positive group (P<0.001) suggests that a positive PUA test is associated with a severe disease course. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups, and antibiotics were used in almost all patients (96.2%). While the PUA test may help guide antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients, its interpretation should be approached with caution.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Cat-pork syndrome is an uncommon food allergy induced by red meat (pork/beef) that cross-reacts with cat/dog allergens, which is mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to the cat/dog albumin component. We report 2 cases of cat-pork syndrome occurred in adult pet breeders. They had suffered from allergic rhinitis/atopic dermatitis sensitive to cat/dog dander as well as house dust mites for several years, during which an immediate type of food allergy due to red meats developed whenever taking pork or beef. ImmunoCAP results showed the increased levels of serum-specific IgE to pork and beef allergens (f26, f27) as well as cat and dog dander (e1, e5); moreover, increased level of serum-specific IgE to the cat albumin component (e224) was noted. In conclusion, cat-food allergy can be found in allergic patients among whom are sensitive to cats and dogs and develop food allergy due to red meat.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Cat-pork syndrome is an uncommon food allergy induced by red meat (pork/beef) that cross-reacts with cat/dog allergens, which is mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to the cat/dog albumin component. We report 2 cases of cat-pork syndrome occurred in adult pet breeders. They had suffered from allergic rhinitis/atopic dermatitis sensitive to cat/dog dander as well as house dust mites for several years, during which an immediate type of food allergy due to red meats developed whenever taking pork or beef. ImmunoCAP results showed the increased levels of serum-specific IgE to pork and beef allergens (f26, f27) as well as cat and dog dander (e1, e5); moreover, increased level of serum-specific IgE to the cat albumin component (e224) was noted. In conclusion, cat-food allergy can be found in allergic patients among whom are sensitive to cats and dogs and develop food allergy due to red meat.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Cat-pork syndrome is an uncommon food allergy induced by red meat (pork/beef) that cross-reacts with cat/dog allergens, which is mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to the cat/dog albumin component. We report 2 cases of cat-pork syndrome occurred in adult pet breeders. They had suffered from allergic rhinitis/atopic dermatitis sensitive to cat/dog dander as well as house dust mites for several years, during which an immediate type of food allergy due to red meats developed whenever taking pork or beef. ImmunoCAP results showed the increased levels of serum-specific IgE to pork and beef allergens (f26, f27) as well as cat and dog dander (e1, e5); moreover, increased level of serum-specific IgE to the cat albumin component (e224) was noted. In conclusion, cat-food allergy can be found in allergic patients among whom are sensitive to cats and dogs and develop food allergy due to red meat.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Cat-pork syndrome is an uncommon food allergy induced by red meat (pork/beef) that cross-reacts with cat/dog allergens, which is mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to the cat/dog albumin component. We report 2 cases of cat-pork syndrome occurred in adult pet breeders. They had suffered from allergic rhinitis/atopic dermatitis sensitive to cat/dog dander as well as house dust mites for several years, during which an immediate type of food allergy due to red meats developed whenever taking pork or beef. ImmunoCAP results showed the increased levels of serum-specific IgE to pork and beef allergens (f26, f27) as well as cat and dog dander (e1, e5); moreover, increased level of serum-specific IgE to the cat albumin component (e224) was noted. In conclusion, cat-food allergy can be found in allergic patients among whom are sensitive to cats and dogs and develop food allergy due to red meat.