Lomentospora prolificans is a rare opportunistic mold with high intrinsic resistance to most antifungal agents. It causes disseminated infections in immunocompromised patients and localized infections in immunocompetent hosts, often involving the bones, joints, or skin. However, prosthetic joint infections (PJI) due to L. prolificans have not been previously reported.Here, we describe the first case of L. prolificans PJI in an immunocompetent 51-year-old male patients, who had no significant comorbidities other than hypertension. The patient presented with right knee pain and swelling one year after total knee arthroplasty. Cultures of the joint fluid and periprosthetic tissue yielded L. prolificans, as confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and rRNA gene sequencing. Susceptibility testing showed high minimum inhibitory concentrations for most currently available antifungal agents, including azoles, amphotericin B, echinocandins, and terbinafine. Despite prosthesis removal, multiple surgical debridements, and prolonged antifungal therapy, including voriconazole and terbinafine, the infection persisted over a five-year period.Amputation was discussed as a potential curative measure; however, no consensus has been reached due to its long-term impact. This case highlights the clinical challenges of managing L. prolificans PJI and underscores the need for novel antifungal therapies to treat rare drugresistant fungal infections.

Background: This study was performed to compare the viral load and kinetics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in saliva with those in standard nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swabs. Methods: Fifteen patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from four hospitals were prospectively enrolled and matched samples of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva were collected at Day 1 of admission and every other day till consequently negative for two times. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was performed to detect the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) genes. Results: The cycle threshold values of saliva were comparable to those of NP/OP swabs overall (P = 0.720, Mann–Whitney U test). However, the overall sensitivity of rRT-PCR using saliva was 64% (34/53), which is lower than the 77% (41/53) using NP/OP swabs. The sensitivity of rRT-PCR using saliva was especially lower in early stage of symptom onset (1–5 days; 8/15; 53%) and in patients who did not have sputum (12/22; 55%). Conclusion Saliva sample itself is not appropriate for initial diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to replace NP/OP swabs, especially for the person who does not produce sputum. COVID-19 cannot be excluded when the test using saliva is negative, and it is necessary to retest using NP/OP swabs.