Objectives: Although non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NADNETs) are rare neoplasms, their incidence has been increasing. In this study, we aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients with NADNETs who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) or surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 55 adults (aged 26–78 years) diagnosed with NADNETs between 2009 and 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital. We categorized the patients into 3 groups: 21 underwent ER, 28 underwent surgical resection, and 6 had no detectable residual tumors after the initial biopsy during the follow-up period. Continuous data were examined using the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis tests, and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 21 patients, with a mean tumor size of 9.2±5.3 mm, underwent successful ER. After ER, three patients experienced perforation (14% [3/21]); two underwent primary repair surgery, and one recovered with conservative treatment. The mean tumor size of 28 patients who underwent surgical resection was 13.9±6.7 mm. There were no cases of postoperative bleeding or perforation; however, four patients experienced ileus and required prolonged hospital stays. The median follow-up periods for patients who underwent ER, surgical resection, and removal after the initial biopsy were 42, 48, and 42.5 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, no recurrence was observed in any group. Conclusions Recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing ER for NADNETs, with an endoscopically measured size of approximately 10 mm, was comparable to that of patients undergoing surgical resection. However, ER carried a relatively high risk of perforation due to the challenging anatomical access and thin duodenal wall.

Objectives: Although non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NADNETs) are rare neoplasms, their incidence has been increasing. In this study, we aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients with NADNETs who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) or surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 55 adults (aged 26–78 years) diagnosed with NADNETs between 2009 and 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital. We categorized the patients into 3 groups: 21 underwent ER, 28 underwent surgical resection, and 6 had no detectable residual tumors after the initial biopsy during the follow-up period. Continuous data were examined using the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis tests, and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 21 patients, with a mean tumor size of 9.2±5.3 mm, underwent successful ER. After ER, three patients experienced perforation (14% [3/21]); two underwent primary repair surgery, and one recovered with conservative treatment. The mean tumor size of 28 patients who underwent surgical resection was 13.9±6.7 mm. There were no cases of postoperative bleeding or perforation; however, four patients experienced ileus and required prolonged hospital stays. The median follow-up periods for patients who underwent ER, surgical resection, and removal after the initial biopsy were 42, 48, and 42.5 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, no recurrence was observed in any group. Conclusions Recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing ER for NADNETs, with an endoscopically measured size of approximately 10 mm, was comparable to that of patients undergoing surgical resection. However, ER carried a relatively high risk of perforation due to the challenging anatomical access and thin duodenal wall.

Background: This study aimed to identify key priorities for the development of guidelines for information and communication technology (ICT)-based patient education tailored to the needs of patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) in the Republic of Korea, based on expert consensus. Methods: A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted with 20 rheumatology, patient education, and digital health literacy experts. A total of 35 items covering 7 domains and 18 subdomains were evaluated. Each item was evaluated for its level of importance, and the responses were rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus levels were defined as “high” (interquartile range [IQR] ≤ 1, agreement ≥ 80%, content validity ratio [CVR] ≥ 0.7), "Moderate" (IQR ≥ 1, agreement 50–79%, CVR 0.5–0.7), and "Low" (IQR > 1, agreement < 50%, CVR < 0.5). Results: Strong consensus was reached for key priorities for developing guidelines in areas such as health literacy, digital health literacy, medical terminology, user interface, and user experience design for mobile apps. Chatbot use and video (e.g., YouTube) also achieved high consensus, whereas AI-powered platforms such as ChatGPT showed moderate-to-high agreement. Telemedicine was excluded because of insufficient consensus. Conclusion The key priorities identified in this study provide a foundation for the development of ICT-based patient education guidelines for RDs in the Republic of Korea.Future efforts should focus on integrating digital tools into clinical practice to enhance patient engagement and improve clinical outcomes.

Background: This study aimed to identify key priorities for the development of guidelines for information and communication technology (ICT)-based patient education tailored to the needs of patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) in the Republic of Korea, based on expert consensus. Methods: A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted with 20 rheumatology, patient education, and digital health literacy experts. A total of 35 items covering 7 domains and 18 subdomains were evaluated. Each item was evaluated for its level of importance, and the responses were rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus levels were defined as “high” (interquartile range [IQR] ≤ 1, agreement ≥ 80%, content validity ratio [CVR] ≥ 0.7), "Moderate" (IQR ≥ 1, agreement 50–79%, CVR 0.5–0.7), and "Low" (IQR > 1, agreement < 50%, CVR < 0.5). Results: Strong consensus was reached for key priorities for developing guidelines in areas such as health literacy, digital health literacy, medical terminology, user interface, and user experience design for mobile apps. Chatbot use and video (e.g., YouTube) also achieved high consensus, whereas AI-powered platforms such as ChatGPT showed moderate-to-high agreement. Telemedicine was excluded because of insufficient consensus. Conclusion The key priorities identified in this study provide a foundation for the development of ICT-based patient education guidelines for RDs in the Republic of Korea.Future efforts should focus on integrating digital tools into clinical practice to enhance patient engagement and improve clinical outcomes.

Background: To identify the optimal surgical technique for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), this study compared surgical outcomes and incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in patients undergoing single-level ACDF using cage alone single-level fusion and plate fixation techniques. Methods: This single-center retrospective study (2003–2018) included patients who underwent single-level ACDF with either plate fixation (PLATE) or cage (CAGE) alone. The radiologic and clinical outcomes between the 2 surgical groups were compared over a 4-year follow-up period. Outcomes of interest included parameters related to range of motion, sagittal alignment, as well as fusion, subsidence, and ASD rates. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Dysphagia and hoarseness rates were estimated based on medical records. Results: Forty-seven patients were included (n=17 in CAGE group). In the CAGE group, 94.1% of the patients had Bridwell grade 1 or 2, compared to 83.3% in the PLATE group (p = 0.396). Subsidence occurred in 12.5% and 3.6% of the CAGE and PLATE cases, respectively (p = 0.543). Segmental kyphosis progressed in the CAGE group compared to the PLATE group at 12, 24, and 48 months (p < 0.001). Radiographic ASD was observed in 41.2% and 30.0% of patients in the CAGE and PLATE groups, respectively, with a higher incidence in the upper segments for both groups. Preoperative NDI scores were similar between the groups; however, postoperatively, the CAGE group had significantly lower NDI scores (3.50 ± 2.74 vs. 8.00 ± 5.81) at 4 years (p = 0.020). Neck pain VAS scores also showed significant improvement in the CAGE group (2.33 ± 2.94) compared with that in the PLATE group (3.07 ± 2.31) at 4 years (p = 0.045). Both groups showed comparable arm pain VAS scores at 2 and 4 years postoperatively. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 1 patient in the PLATE group, resolving almost completely by 1 year. Conclusions Single-level ACDF using a cage alone technique demonstrated favorable radiologic and clinical outcomes overall compared to plate-augmented ACDF. However, plate augmentation is recommended for patients with severe cervical kyphosis or those at high risk of subsidence.

This study examined the case of 27-year-old female who underwent orthognathic surgery to correct class 3 malocclusion, resulting in an unnatural smile. The research aimed to assess the efficacy of non-invasive treatment in enhancing facial muscle movement during smiling to achieve a natural smile. The patient received eight sessions of treatment using non-invasive devices, and facial assessment were conducted using three-dimensional scanner (Morpheus 3D Scanner) to evaluate facial features in both relaxed and maximum smile states pre- and post-treatment. The results demonstrated improvements in the symmetry of the lower lip height during smiling, along with increases in mouth width and volume in the upper central area. Subjectively, the patient also reported enhanced comfort while smiling. These findings suggest that non-invasive procedures can effectively improve unnatural smiles following orthognathic surgery, contributing to a more aesthetically pleasing smile presentation.

This study examined the case of 27-year-old female who underwent orthognathic surgery to correct class 3 malocclusion, resulting in an unnatural smile. The research aimed to assess the efficacy of non-invasive treatment in enhancing facial muscle movement during smiling to achieve a natural smile. The patient received eight sessions of treatment using non-invasive devices, and facial assessment were conducted using three-dimensional scanner (Morpheus 3D Scanner) to evaluate facial features in both relaxed and maximum smile states pre- and post-treatment. The results demonstrated improvements in the symmetry of the lower lip height during smiling, along with increases in mouth width and volume in the upper central area. Subjectively, the patient also reported enhanced comfort while smiling. These findings suggest that non-invasive procedures can effectively improve unnatural smiles following orthognathic surgery, contributing to a more aesthetically pleasing smile presentation.

This study introduces a novel biportal endoscopic foraminal decompression technique that minimizes bone removal while ensuring safe and effective nerve root decompression. Leveraging the accessory process as a key surgical landmark, this technique enables precise navigation and controlled turn-down of the ligamentum flavum (LF). A key advantage of this technique is its reduced requirement for bone resection, differing from traditional microscopic or uniportal endoscopic surgeries that often necessitate resection of the lateral isthmus or superior articular process. This technique is particularly beneficial for foraminal and extraforaminal herniated nucleus pulposus cases, where bony decompression needs are relatively lower compared to foraminal stenosis. Using the accessory process as a landmark also enhances surgical precision and reduces the risk of nerve root injury, providing a valuable advantage for less experienced surgeons. Despite these advantages, challenges exist, particularly at the L5–S1 level, where the less prominent accessory process and limited workspace due to anatomical constraints can pose difficulties. In cases of severe bony compression, additional bone removal may be necessary to achieve adequate decompression. In conclusion, the Non-facetectomy LF turn-down technique (non-facetectomy foraminal decompression) offers a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative for treating various foraminal pathologies.