Background: To identify the optimal surgical technique for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), this study compared surgical outcomes and incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in patients undergoing single-level ACDF using cage alone single-level fusion and plate fixation techniques. Methods: This single-center retrospective study (2003–2018) included patients who underwent single-level ACDF with either plate fixation (PLATE) or cage (CAGE) alone. The radiologic and clinical outcomes between the 2 surgical groups were compared over a 4-year follow-up period. Outcomes of interest included parameters related to range of motion, sagittal alignment, as well as fusion, subsidence, and ASD rates. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Dysphagia and hoarseness rates were estimated based on medical records. Results: Forty-seven patients were included (n=17 in CAGE group). In the CAGE group, 94.1% of the patients had Bridwell grade 1 or 2, compared to 83.3% in the PLATE group (p = 0.396). Subsidence occurred in 12.5% and 3.6% of the CAGE and PLATE cases, respectively (p = 0.543). Segmental kyphosis progressed in the CAGE group compared to the PLATE group at 12, 24, and 48 months (p < 0.001). Radiographic ASD was observed in 41.2% and 30.0% of patients in the CAGE and PLATE groups, respectively, with a higher incidence in the upper segments for both groups. Preoperative NDI scores were similar between the groups; however, postoperatively, the CAGE group had significantly lower NDI scores (3.50 ± 2.74 vs. 8.00 ± 5.81) at 4 years (p = 0.020). Neck pain VAS scores also showed significant improvement in the CAGE group (2.33 ± 2.94) compared with that in the PLATE group (3.07 ± 2.31) at 4 years (p = 0.045). Both groups showed comparable arm pain VAS scores at 2 and 4 years postoperatively. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 1 patient in the PLATE group, resolving almost completely by 1 year. Conclusions Single-level ACDF using a cage alone technique demonstrated favorable radiologic and clinical outcomes overall compared to plate-augmented ACDF. However, plate augmentation is recommended for patients with severe cervical kyphosis or those at high risk of subsidence.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication. Methods: The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols. Results: The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors. Conclusion The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.

Purpose: Thrombosis and bleeding significantly affect morbidity and mortality in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in MPN patients remain uncertain. Materials and Methods: We conducted a large, retrospective, nationwide cohort study using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database from 2010 to 2021. Results: Out of the 368 MPN patients included in the final analysis, 62.8% were treated with DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF), and 37.2% for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The AF group was statistically older with higher CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category [female]) scores compared to the VTE group. Antiplatelet agents were used in 51.1% of cases, and cytoreductive drugs in 79.3%, with hydroxyurea being the most common (64.9%). The median follow-up was 22.3 months, with 1-year cumulative incidence rates of thrombosis and bleeding at 11.1% and 3.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥ 3 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.48), concomitant antiplatelet use (HR, 2.57), and cytoreduction (HR, 2.20) as significant thrombosis risk factors but found no significant predictors for major bleeding. Conclusion Despite the limitations of retrospective data, DOAC treatment in MPN patients seems effective and has an acceptable bleeding risk.

Owing to recent advancements in various postoperative treatment modalities, such as radiation, chemotherapy, antiangiogenic treatment, and immunotherapy, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma using post-treatment imaging has become increasingly challenging. This review highlights the challenges in differentiating treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and pseudoresponse from true tumor progression and aims to serve as a guideline for efficient communication with clinicians for optimal management of patients with post-treatment imaging.

The paradigm of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma is rapidly evolving, reflecting clinical, pathological, and imaging advancements. Thus, it remains challenging for radiologists, even those who are dedicated to neuro-oncology imaging, to keep pace with this rapidly progressing field and provide useful and updated information to clinicians. Based on current knowledge, radiologists can play a significant role in managing patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma by providing accurate preoperative diagnosis as well as preoperative and postoperative treatment planning including accurate delineation of the residual tumor. Through active communication with clinicians, extending far beyond the confines of the radiology reading room, radiologists can impact clinical decision making. This Part 1 review provides an overview about the neuropathological diagnosis of glioblastoma to understand the past, present, and upcoming revisions of the World Health Organization classification.The imaging findings that are noteworthy for radiologists while communicating with clinicians on preoperative and immediate postoperative imaging of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas will be summarized.

Owing to recent advancements in various postoperative treatment modalities, such as radiation, chemotherapy, antiangiogenic treatment, and immunotherapy, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma using post-treatment imaging has become increasingly challenging. This review highlights the challenges in differentiating treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and pseudoresponse from true tumor progression and aims to serve as a guideline for efficient communication with clinicians for optimal management of patients with post-treatment imaging.

The paradigm of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma is rapidly evolving, reflecting clinical, pathological, and imaging advancements. Thus, it remains challenging for radiologists, even those who are dedicated to neuro-oncology imaging, to keep pace with this rapidly progressing field and provide useful and updated information to clinicians. Based on current knowledge, radiologists can play a significant role in managing patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma by providing accurate preoperative diagnosis as well as preoperative and postoperative treatment planning including accurate delineation of the residual tumor. Through active communication with clinicians, extending far beyond the confines of the radiology reading room, radiologists can impact clinical decision making. This Part 1 review provides an overview about the neuropathological diagnosis of glioblastoma to understand the past, present, and upcoming revisions of the World Health Organization classification.The imaging findings that are noteworthy for radiologists while communicating with clinicians on preoperative and immediate postoperative imaging of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas will be summarized.

Owing to recent advancements in various postoperative treatment modalities, such as radiation, chemotherapy, antiangiogenic treatment, and immunotherapy, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma using post-treatment imaging has become increasingly challenging. This review highlights the challenges in differentiating treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and pseudoresponse from true tumor progression and aims to serve as a guideline for efficient communication with clinicians for optimal management of patients with post-treatment imaging.

The paradigm of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma is rapidly evolving, reflecting clinical, pathological, and imaging advancements. Thus, it remains challenging for radiologists, even those who are dedicated to neuro-oncology imaging, to keep pace with this rapidly progressing field and provide useful and updated information to clinicians. Based on current knowledge, radiologists can play a significant role in managing patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma by providing accurate preoperative diagnosis as well as preoperative and postoperative treatment planning including accurate delineation of the residual tumor. Through active communication with clinicians, extending far beyond the confines of the radiology reading room, radiologists can impact clinical decision making. This Part 1 review provides an overview about the neuropathological diagnosis of glioblastoma to understand the past, present, and upcoming revisions of the World Health Organization classification.The imaging findings that are noteworthy for radiologists while communicating with clinicians on preoperative and immediate postoperative imaging of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas will be summarized.