Objective: Although most gallbladder polyps are benign, some neoplastic polyps may be malignant or may serve as precursors to malignancy. Distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps using imaging examinations remains a major challenge.This meta-analysis aimed to identify the ultrasound (US) features that are significantly associated with neoplastic polyps. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and KoreaMed databases were searched for articles published up to August 31, 2025. Bivariate random-effects models were used to calculate the meta-analytic pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivities, and specificities, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for each US imaging feature in the diagnosis of neoplastic polyps. Results: Thirty studies evaluating 8,953 patients, including 1,216 (13.6%) patients with neoplastic polyps, were included.Among the nine evaluated US imaging features, namely, size ≥10 mm, sessile morphology, single polyp, coexisting gallstones, hypoechogenicity, heterogeneous echogenicity, gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT), absence of hyperechoic spot, and vascularity, eight were significantly associated with neoplastic polyps: size ≥10 mm (DOR: 6.23 [95% CI: 1.86– 20.90]), sessile morphology (DOR: 3.54 [1.93–5.97]), single polyp (DOR: 2.21 [1.76–2.74]), coexisting gallstones (DOR:1.86 [1.29–2.60]), hypoechogenicity (DOR: 3.55 [1.47–7.30]), GBWT (DOR: 9.38 [1.47–32.20]), absence of hyperechoic spots (DOR: 4.23 [2.46–6.83]), and vascularity (DOR: 9.72 [5.81–15.30]). Of these, size ≥10 mm demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity (0.79 [95% CI: 0.68–0.87]), whereas hypoechogenicity showed the highest pooled specificity (0.93 [95% CI: 0.82–0.98]). Conclusion Eight US imaging features (size ≥10 mm, sessile morphology, single polyp, coexisting gallstones, hypoechogenicity, GBWT, absence of hyperechoic spots, and vascularity) were significantly associated with the presence of neoplastic polyps.These features may facilitate the management of gallbladder polyps.

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has brought a revolution to the management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection, but its role in patients with active hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. Early observations suggested a high rate of HCC recurrence following DAA treatment, raising concerns about a potential oncogenic effect regarding rapid viral clearance. However, subsequent large-scale cohort studies and meta-analyses have not consistently confirmed this finding, leading to an overall neutral conclusion regarding the impact of DAA on HCC recurrence. International guidelines from organizations such as the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver offer conflicting recommendations, underscoring the absence of a universal framework for this patient population. While the available evidence is largely heterogeneous and retrospective, current data indicate that DAA therapy can be safely integrated into HCC management without clear evidence of harm. Oncologic outcomes, particularly overall and recurrence-free survival, are most favorable when DAAs are administered in close proximity to curative procedures or in non-transplant therapeutic settings. In contrast, studies in liver transplant candidates often show a neutral effect on oncologic outcomes after adjusting for confounding variables. These findings underscore the necessity of individualized, multidisciplinary decisions based on tumor biology, hepatic reserve, and treatment intent. Prospective studies and validated biomarkers are essential to establish a more definitive framework for optimizing DAA therapy in this complex clinical context.

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

Purpose: The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a key quantitative index in nuclear medicine imaging; however, variations in region‐of‐interest (ROI) determination exist across institutions. This study aims to standardize SUV evaluation by introducing a deep learning‐based quantitative analysis method that enhances diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Methods: We used the Swin UNETR model to automatically segment key organs (breast, liver, spleen, and bone marrow) critical for breast cancer prognosis. Tumor segmentation was performed iteratively based on predefined SUV thresholds, and prognostic information was extracted from the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (reticuloendothelial system). The artificial intelligence training process employed 3 datasets: a test dataset (40 patients), a validation dataset (10 patients), and an independent test dataset (10 patients). To validate our approach, we compared the SUV values obtained using our method with those produced by commercial software. Results: In a dataset of 10 patients, our method achieved an auto‐segmentation accuracy of 0.9311 for all target organs. Comparison of maximum SUV and mean SUV values from our automated segmentation with those from traditional single‐ROI methods revealed differences of 0.19 and 0.16, respectively, demonstrating improved reliability and accuracy in whole‐organ SUV analysis. Conclusion This study successfully standardized SUV calculation in nuclear medicine imaging through deep learning‐based automated organ segmentation and SUV analysis, significantly enhancing accuracy in predicting breast cancer prognosis.

Purpose: The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a key quantitative index in nuclear medicine imaging; however, variations in region‐of‐interest (ROI) determination exist across institutions. This study aims to standardize SUV evaluation by introducing a deep learning‐based quantitative analysis method that enhances diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Methods: We used the Swin UNETR model to automatically segment key organs (breast, liver, spleen, and bone marrow) critical for breast cancer prognosis. Tumor segmentation was performed iteratively based on predefined SUV thresholds, and prognostic information was extracted from the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (reticuloendothelial system). The artificial intelligence training process employed 3 datasets: a test dataset (40 patients), a validation dataset (10 patients), and an independent test dataset (10 patients). To validate our approach, we compared the SUV values obtained using our method with those produced by commercial software. Results: In a dataset of 10 patients, our method achieved an auto‐segmentation accuracy of 0.9311 for all target organs. Comparison of maximum SUV and mean SUV values from our automated segmentation with those from traditional single‐ROI methods revealed differences of 0.19 and 0.16, respectively, demonstrating improved reliability and accuracy in whole‐organ SUV analysis. Conclusion This study successfully standardized SUV calculation in nuclear medicine imaging through deep learning‐based automated organ segmentation and SUV analysis, significantly enhancing accuracy in predicting breast cancer prognosis.

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

Purpose: The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a key quantitative index in nuclear medicine imaging; however, variations in region‐of‐interest (ROI) determination exist across institutions. This study aims to standardize SUV evaluation by introducing a deep learning‐based quantitative analysis method that enhances diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Methods: We used the Swin UNETR model to automatically segment key organs (breast, liver, spleen, and bone marrow) critical for breast cancer prognosis. Tumor segmentation was performed iteratively based on predefined SUV thresholds, and prognostic information was extracted from the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (reticuloendothelial system). The artificial intelligence training process employed 3 datasets: a test dataset (40 patients), a validation dataset (10 patients), and an independent test dataset (10 patients). To validate our approach, we compared the SUV values obtained using our method with those produced by commercial software. Results: In a dataset of 10 patients, our method achieved an auto‐segmentation accuracy of 0.9311 for all target organs. Comparison of maximum SUV and mean SUV values from our automated segmentation with those from traditional single‐ROI methods revealed differences of 0.19 and 0.16, respectively, demonstrating improved reliability and accuracy in whole‐organ SUV analysis. Conclusion This study successfully standardized SUV calculation in nuclear medicine imaging through deep learning‐based automated organ segmentation and SUV analysis, significantly enhancing accuracy in predicting breast cancer prognosis.

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

Purpose: The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a key quantitative index in nuclear medicine imaging; however, variations in region‐of‐interest (ROI) determination exist across institutions. This study aims to standardize SUV evaluation by introducing a deep learning‐based quantitative analysis method that enhances diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Methods: We used the Swin UNETR model to automatically segment key organs (breast, liver, spleen, and bone marrow) critical for breast cancer prognosis. Tumor segmentation was performed iteratively based on predefined SUV thresholds, and prognostic information was extracted from the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (reticuloendothelial system). The artificial intelligence training process employed 3 datasets: a test dataset (40 patients), a validation dataset (10 patients), and an independent test dataset (10 patients). To validate our approach, we compared the SUV values obtained using our method with those produced by commercial software. Results: In a dataset of 10 patients, our method achieved an auto‐segmentation accuracy of 0.9311 for all target organs. Comparison of maximum SUV and mean SUV values from our automated segmentation with those from traditional single‐ROI methods revealed differences of 0.19 and 0.16, respectively, demonstrating improved reliability and accuracy in whole‐organ SUV analysis. Conclusion This study successfully standardized SUV calculation in nuclear medicine imaging through deep learning‐based automated organ segmentation and SUV analysis, significantly enhancing accuracy in predicting breast cancer prognosis.

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.