1.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
2.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
3.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
4.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
5.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
6.Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Solid Cancer: A Joint Report from KSMO and KSP
Miso KIM ; Hyo Sup SHIM ; Sheehyun KIM ; In Hee LEE ; Jihun KIM ; Shinkyo YOON ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Jae Ho JEONG ; Changhoon YOO ; Jaekyung CHEON ; In-Ho KIM ; Jieun LEE ; Sook Hee HONG ; Sehhoon PARK ; Hyun Ae JUNG ; Jin Won KIM ; Han Jo KIM ; Yongjun CHA ; Sun Min LIM ; Han Sang KIM ; Choong-kun LEE ; Jee Hung KIM ; Sang Hoon CHUN ; Jina YUN ; So Yeon PARK ; Hye Seung LEE ; Yong Mee CHO ; Soo Jeong NAM ; Kiyong NA ; Sun Och YOON ; Ahwon LEE ; Kee-Taek JANG ; Hongseok YUN ; Sungyoung LEE ; Jee Hyun KIM ; Wan-Seop KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(3):721-742
In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.
7.SoUth Korean study to PrEvent cognitive impaiRment and protect BRAIN health through Multidomain interventions via facE-to-facE and video communication plaTforms in mild cognitive impairment (SUPERBRAIN-MEET): Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Soo Hyun CHO ; Hae Jin KANG ; Yoo Kyoung PARK ; So Young MOON ; Chang Hyung HONG ; Hae Ri NA ; Hong-Sun SONG ; Muncheong CHOI ; Sooin JEONG ; Kyung Won PARK ; Hyun Sook KIM ; Buong-O CHUN ; Jiwoo JUNG ; Jee Hyang JEONG ; Seong Hye CHOI
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2024;23(1):30-43
Background:
and Purpose: The SoUth Korea study to PrEvent cognitive impaiRment and protect BRAIN health through lifestyle intervention (SUPERBRAIN) proved the feasibility of multidomain intervention for elderly people. One-quarter of the Korean population over 65 years of age has mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Digital health interventions may be costeffective and have fewer spatial constraints. We aim to examine the efficacy of a multidomain intervention through both face-to-face interactions and video communication platforms using a tablet personal computer (PC) application in MCI.
Methods:
Three hundred participants aged 60–85 years, with MCI and at least one modifiable dementia risk factor, will be recruited from 17 centers and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the multidomain intervention and the waiting-list control groups. Participants will receive the 24-week intervention through the tablet PC SUPERBRAIN application, which encompasses the following five elements: managing metabolic and vascular risk factors, cognitive training,physical exercise, nutritional guidance, and boosting motivation. Participants will attend the interventions at a facility every 1–2 weeks. They will also engage in one or two self-administered cognitive training sessions utilizing the tablet PC application at home each week. They will participate in twice or thrice weekly online exercise sessions at home via the ZOOM platform. The primary outcome will be the change in the total scale index score of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status from baseline to study end.
Conclusions
This study will inform the effectiveness of a comprehensive multidomain intervention utilizing digital technologies in MCI.
8.Atrial fibrillation fact sheet in Korea 2024(part 1): epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in Korea
So‑Ryoung LEE ; Daehoon KIM ; Sung Ho LEE ; Woo‑Hyun LIM ; Kwang Jin CHUN ; Won‑Seok CHOE ; Hyo‑Jeong AHN ; Kyung‑Yeon LEE ; JungMin CHOI ; Bong‑Seong KIM ; Kyung‑Do HAN ; Eue‑Keun CHOI
International Journal of Arrhythmia 2024;25(3):13-
Background and objectives:
This study aimed to analyze and present updated trends in atrial fibrillation (AF) epidemiology within the Korean population, providing a foundation for planning and implementing appropriate management and treatment strategies for patients with AF.
Patients and methods:
We used the Korean National Health Insurance Service database to evaluate the prevalence, incidence, comorbidities, and clinical adverse outcomes of patients with AF in Korea between 2013 and 2022.
Results:
AF prevalence in Korean adults aged ≥ 20 years doubled (1.1 to 2.2%) between 2013 and 2022, with significant increases observed across various sex and age groups. Similarly, the number of newly diagnosed patients with AF per year increased steadily, with the incidence rising from 184 to 275 per 100,000 person-years, particularly among older populations. Over this period, the mean age of patients with AF increased from 67.7 to 70.3 years, and comorbidities prevalence and CHA2DS2-VASc score rose significantly, indicating a higher stroke risk. Compared with patients without AF, AF was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78), ischemic stroke (HR: 2.39), major bleeding (HR: 2.10), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.44), and heart failure admission (HR: 2.42).
Conclusion
AF prevalence and incidence have steadily increased between 2013 and 2022, with a more pronounced increase in older patients. Patients with AF are increasingly becoming a high-risk population and are at increased risk of clinical adverse outcomes compared to non-AF patients. Therefore, a sustained national effort to improve AF awareness and comprehensive care quality for patients with AF is required.
9.Intensive Surveillance for Women With Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Korea
Sungmin PARK ; Hyeong-Gon MOON ; Jong Won LEE ; Ku Sang KIM ; Zisun KIM ; So-Youn JUNG ; Jihyoun LEE ; Se Kyung LEE ; Byung Joo CHAE ; Sung Ui JUNG ; Jung Whan CHUN ; Jong-Ho CHEUN ; Hyun Jo YOUN
Journal of Breast Cancer 2024;27(4):235-247
Purpose:
This study evaluated the effectiveness of different surveillance intensities on morbidity and mortality in women with breast cancer.
Methods:
This retrospective study included patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery in the Republic of Korea between 2009 and 2011. The patients were divided into two groups based on the intensity of their postsurgical surveillance: intensive surveillance group (ISG) and less-intensive surveillance group. Surveillance intensity was measured based on the frequency and type of follow-up diagnostic tests conducted, including mammography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scans, and positron emission tomography scans.
Results:
We included 1,356 patients with a median follow-up period of 121.2 months (range, 12.8–168.0 months). The analysis revealed no significant difference in the overall survival (OS) between the two groups within five years of surgery. However, patients with ISG exhibited significantly better breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and distant metastasisfree survival (DMFS) within the same period. Five years after surgery, the differences in survival outcomes between the groups were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
Intensive surveillance did not demonstrate a significant improvement in OS for patients with breast cancer beyond five years postoperatively. However, within the first five years, intensive surveillance was associated with better BCSS and DMFS. These findings suggest that personalized surveillance strategies may benefit specific patient subsets, particularly in the early years after treatment. Further nationwide randomized studies are warranted to refine surveillance guidelines and optimize outcomes in patients with breast cancer.
10.Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using SecondGeneration Drug-Eluting Stent
Jung-Hee LEE ; Young Jin YOUN ; Ho Sung JEON ; Jun-Won LEE ; Sung Gyun AHN ; Junghan YOON ; Hyeon-Cheol GWON ; Young Bin SONG ; Ki Hong CHOI ; Hyo-Soo KIM ; Woo Jung CHUN ; Seung-Ho HUR ; Chang-Wook NAM ; Yun-Kyeong CHO ; Seung Hwan HAN ; Seung-Woon RHA ; In-Ho CHAE ; Jin-Ok JEONG ; Jung Ho HEO ; Do-Sun LIM ; Jong-Seon PARK ; Myeong-Ki HONG ; Joon-Hyung DOH ; Kwang Soo CHA ; Doo-Il KIM ; Sang Yeub LEE ; Kiyuk CHANG ; Byung-Hee HWANG ; So-Yeon CHOI ; Myung Ho JEONG ; Hyun-Jong LEE
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(10):e111-
Background:
The benefits of transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are uncertain because of the limited availability of device selection. This study aimed to compare the procedural differences and the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of TRA and TFA for bifurcation PCI using secondgeneration drug-eluting stents (DESs).
Methods:
Based on data from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry III, a retrospective registry of 2,648 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI with second-generation DES from 21 centers in South Korea, patients were categorized into the TRA group (n = 1,507) or the TFA group (n = 1,141). After propensity score matching (PSM), procedural differences, in-hospital outcomes, and device-oriented composite outcomes (DOCOs; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) were compared between the two groups (772 matched patients each group).
Results:
Despite well-balanced baseline clinical and lesion characteristics after PSM, the use of the two-stent strategy (14.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.001) and the incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes, primarily driven by access site complications (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.015), were significantly lower in the TRA group than in the TFA group. At the 5-year follow-up, the incidence of DOCOs was similar between the groups (6.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.639).
Conclusion
The findings suggested that TRA may be safer than TFA for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DESs. Despite differences in treatment strategy, TRA was associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes as those of TFA. Therefore, TRA might be the preferred access for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DES.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail