Objective: This study presents an early multicentre experience with an adapted basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) technique using bilateral transpedicular access, evaluating its safety, efficacy, and potential for expanded indications. Methods: Participants were recruited from 2 Gold Coast centres based on the presence of chronic, sharp midline axial lower back pain and evidence of type 1 or type 2 Modic changes on imaging. The radiofrequency ablation procedure was performed via transpedicular access under computed tomographic guidance. Satisfaction outcomes were assessed at 2 months using a visual analogue scale and Likert scales. Statistical analyses compared outcomes according to sex and pain indications. Results: Forty patients were included in the study, of whom 33 underwent BVNA for Modic type 1 and type 2 vertebrogenic pain, and 8 underwent the procedure for expanded indications, with no complications reported. Among those treated for expanded indications, 2 had vertebrogenic endplate changes adjacent to a prior fusion, 2 had persistent pain following subacute osteoporotic fractures, and one each presented with a haemangioma, inflammatory endplate osteitis associated with spondyloarthropathy, and a postmyeloma fracture. Overall, 75% of participants reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment of their painful condition. All patients treated for expanded indications expressed satisfaction or high satisfaction, with visual analogue score reductions ranging from 30% to 100%. Conclusion Early experience with BVNA using a bilateral transpedicular access technique suggests that it is a safe and effective procedure. It may also be applicable in selected cases involving expanded indications, particularly where persistent back pain remains refractory to or unsuitable for other therapeutic options.

Purpose: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is occasionally utilized during sigmoidectomy to facilitate a tension-free colorectal anastomosis. Present literature regarding its use, safety, and efficacy predominantly evaluates traditional laparoscopic vs. open techniques, thus not adequately representing the current minimally invasive surgical landscape. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated SFM during sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease via traditional laparoscopic, single-incision laparoscopic, and robotic techniques at a United States academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Primary outcomes were the rate of SFM, independent predictors, and short-term outcomes. Results: A total of 117 patients underwent sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis by six colorectal surgeons, of whom 27 underwent SFM. SFM was associated with higher rates of complicated diverticulitis (85.2% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001), including abscess (55.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.037) and fistulae (59.3% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001). Presence of a fistula was an independent predictor of SFM by logistic regression (odds ratio [OR], 5.886; p < 0.001). Mobilization was associated with more concomitant surgical procedures (66.7% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001). There was a significant association between SFM and conversion to open approach (14.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.049), longer length of stay (4.2 ± 2.8 days vs. 3.6 ± 4.3 days, p = 0.041), and increased operative time (241.7 ± 76.4 minutes vs. 199.2 ± 75.7 minutes). There was no difference in 30-day morbidity/mortality. Conclusion Routine SFM can be considered in minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis without significant impact on 30-day morbidity/mortality regardless of surgical approach and may be anticipated preoperatively, particularly when a fistula is present.

Evidence-based treatment strategies for patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes have been updated in recent years. However, substantial gaps remain between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, which justify the urgent need to improve the quality of care for patients with these conditions. The Chinese Society of Cardiology and the Chinese Society of Diabetes, in collaboration with the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association, designed the China Diabetes Cardiovascular project. The China Diabetes Cardiovascular project is a nationwide registry study aimed at improving the quality of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes in China. Launched in 2021, this project has enrolled 36 hospitals across mainland China. Patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of comorbid acute coronary syndrome and diabetes will be eligible to participate. Pre-defined performance measures will be adopted to evaluate the quality of care for these patients. Multiple quality improvement strategies will be adopted, including providing monthly quality reports based on these measures, conducting a series of training courses, and distributing educational materials. A comprehensive dataset, encompassing patients' characteristics, medical history, treatment before and during the current hospitalization, and discharge medications for secondary prevention, will be collected through a web-based data collection platform. This project has the potential to improve the quality of care and reduce the care disparities in the management of patients with these diseases. Moreover, with its comprehensive data collection, this project will provide a strong foundation for exploring key clinical questions.

Evidence-based treatment strategies for patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes have been updated in recent years. However, substantial gaps remain between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, which justify the urgent need to improve the quality of care for patients with these conditions. The Chinese Society of Cardiology and the Chinese Society of Diabetes, in collaboration with the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association, designed the China Diabetes Cardiovascular project. The China Diabetes Cardiovascular project is a nationwide registry study aimed at improving the quality of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes in China. Launched in 2021, this project has enrolled 36 hospitals across mainland China. Patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of comorbid acute coronary syndrome and diabetes will be eligible to participate. Pre-defined performance measures will be adopted to evaluate the quality of care for these patients. Multiple quality improvement strategies will be adopted, including providing monthly quality reports based on these measures, conducting a series of training courses, and distributing educational materials. A comprehensive dataset, encompassing patients' characteristics, medical history, treatment before and during the current hospitalization, and discharge medications for secondary prevention, will be collected through a web-based data collection platform. This project has the potential to improve the quality of care and reduce the care disparities in the management of patients with these diseases. Moreover, with its comprehensive data collection, this project will provide a strong foundation for exploring key clinical questions.

멘델 무작위화(Mendelian randomization, MR) 연구는 조절 가능한 노출(modifiable exposure)이 건강결과에 미치는 인과효과(causal effect)를 더 잘 이해하게 해 주지만, 그 근거는 종종 보고가 불충분함으로 인하여연구 결과의 해석과 적용에 한계가 있을 수 있다. 보고지침은 흔히 무슨 연구를 하고 무엇을 발견했는지 독자가 쉽게 이해하도록 돕는다. STROBE-MR(관찰연구의 멘델 무작위화를 활용한 보고지침)은 MR 연구를 명확하고 투명하게 보고하도록 돕는다. STROBE-MR을 논문 작성에 활용하면 독자, 심사자, 학술지 편집인이 MR 연구의 보고 품질과 완성도를 평가하는 데 도움이 될 것이다. 이 글은 STROBE-MR 체크리스트 20개 항목의 의미와 근거를 설명하고, 각 항목마다 사례를 제시해 독자가 잘 이해할 수 있는 논문 작성법을 설명하려고 하였다.

Background: The PLASMIC score is a convenient tool for predicting ADAMTS13 activity of ＜10%.Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is widely used as a marker of haemolysis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) monitoring, and could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. We aimed to validate the PLASMIC score in a multi-centre Asia Pacific region, and to explore whether LDH could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. Methods: Records of patients with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were reviewed. Patients’ ADAMTS13 activity levels were obtained, along with clinical/laboratory findings relevant to the PLASMIC score. Both PLASMIC scores and PLASMIC-LDH scores, in which LDH replaced traditional lysis markers, were calculated. We generated a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and compared the area under the curve values (AUC) to determine the predictive ability of each score. Results: 46 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 34 had ADAMTS13 activity levels of ＜10%. When the patients were divided into intermediate-to-high risk (scores 5‒7) and low risk (scores 0‒4), the PLASMIC score showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 58.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. The PLASMIC-LDH score had a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 33.3%, with a PPV of 80.5% and NPV of 80.0%. Conclusion Our study validated the utility of the PLASMIC score, and demonstrated PLASMIC-LDH as a reasonable alternative in the absence of traditional lysis markers, to help identify high-risk patients for treatment via plasma exchange.

The transradial approach (TRA) is an effective and safe alternative to transfemoral access for diagnostic neuroangiography and craniocervical interventions. While the technical aspects of supraclavicular intervention are well-described, there are little data on the TRA for thoracolumbar angiography and intervention. The authors describe the feasibility of the TRA for preoperative thoracic tumor embolization, emphasizing technique, device selection, navigation, and catheterization of thoracolumbar segmental arteries. This approach extends the benefits of TRA to spinal interventional neuroradiology.

Results: Propensity matching led to two groups of 89 patients each. The UIV, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, age, and body mass index were similar in both groups (p >0.05). The incidence of PJK at postoperative one year was similar for SE (30.3%) and LF (22.5%) groups (p =0.207). The PJK angle was comparable (p =0.963) with a change of −8.2° (SE) and −8.3° (LF) from the preoperative measures (p =0.954). A higher rate of PJK after SE (p =0.026) was found only in the subgroup of patients with UIV levels between T9 and T12. Conclusions Instrumentation to the sacrum with or without iliac extension did not increase the overall risk of PJK. However, an increased risk for PJK was found after SE with UIV levels between T9 and T12.