Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) face an increased risk of airborne infections owing to close patient contact and extended shifts. N95 respirators require routine fit testing to ensure effective protection. This study assessed the fit stability of N95 masks among nurses working in airborne infection units, using annual fit tests to observe changes over time. Methods: From May 2020 to January 2023, 37 nurses from the high-risk airborne infection units of a university hospital participated in this study. The fit tests followed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Quantitative Fit Testing protocol, and non-parametric statistical analyses were applied. Nurses received formal annual training on N95 mask use and individualized guidance before each fit test. Results: In the initial test, 46.0% passed; of these, 15 consistently passed the second test (Group 1, Pass-Pass) and 2 failed (Group 2, Pass-Fail). No significant associations were found between demographic or job factors and the fit test outcomes. Average fit scores decreased from 100.79 (±58.22) initially to 32.25 (±66.54) in the second test, showing variability. Conclusion Ongoing training and experience improved fit consistency over time, emphasizing the importance of regular education. Rather than testing annually, targeted testing when selecting a new respirator or performing subsequent facial changes may enhance the protection of HCWs and reduce costs.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) face an increased risk of airborne infections owing to close patient contact and extended shifts. N95 respirators require routine fit testing to ensure effective protection. This study assessed the fit stability of N95 masks among nurses working in airborne infection units, using annual fit tests to observe changes over time. Methods: From May 2020 to January 2023, 37 nurses from the high-risk airborne infection units of a university hospital participated in this study. The fit tests followed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Quantitative Fit Testing protocol, and non-parametric statistical analyses were applied. Nurses received formal annual training on N95 mask use and individualized guidance before each fit test. Results: In the initial test, 46.0% passed; of these, 15 consistently passed the second test (Group 1, Pass-Pass) and 2 failed (Group 2, Pass-Fail). No significant associations were found between demographic or job factors and the fit test outcomes. Average fit scores decreased from 100.79 (±58.22) initially to 32.25 (±66.54) in the second test, showing variability. Conclusion Ongoing training and experience improved fit consistency over time, emphasizing the importance of regular education. Rather than testing annually, targeted testing when selecting a new respirator or performing subsequent facial changes may enhance the protection of HCWs and reduce costs.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) face an increased risk of airborne infections owing to close patient contact and extended shifts. N95 respirators require routine fit testing to ensure effective protection. This study assessed the fit stability of N95 masks among nurses working in airborne infection units, using annual fit tests to observe changes over time. Methods: From May 2020 to January 2023, 37 nurses from the high-risk airborne infection units of a university hospital participated in this study. The fit tests followed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Quantitative Fit Testing protocol, and non-parametric statistical analyses were applied. Nurses received formal annual training on N95 mask use and individualized guidance before each fit test. Results: In the initial test, 46.0% passed; of these, 15 consistently passed the second test (Group 1, Pass-Pass) and 2 failed (Group 2, Pass-Fail). No significant associations were found between demographic or job factors and the fit test outcomes. Average fit scores decreased from 100.79 (±58.22) initially to 32.25 (±66.54) in the second test, showing variability. Conclusion Ongoing training and experience improved fit consistency over time, emphasizing the importance of regular education. Rather than testing annually, targeted testing when selecting a new respirator or performing subsequent facial changes may enhance the protection of HCWs and reduce costs.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) face an increased risk of airborne infections owing to close patient contact and extended shifts. N95 respirators require routine fit testing to ensure effective protection. This study assessed the fit stability of N95 masks among nurses working in airborne infection units, using annual fit tests to observe changes over time. Methods: From May 2020 to January 2023, 37 nurses from the high-risk airborne infection units of a university hospital participated in this study. The fit tests followed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Quantitative Fit Testing protocol, and non-parametric statistical analyses were applied. Nurses received formal annual training on N95 mask use and individualized guidance before each fit test. Results: In the initial test, 46.0% passed; of these, 15 consistently passed the second test (Group 1, Pass-Pass) and 2 failed (Group 2, Pass-Fail). No significant associations were found between demographic or job factors and the fit test outcomes. Average fit scores decreased from 100.79 (±58.22) initially to 32.25 (±66.54) in the second test, showing variability. Conclusion Ongoing training and experience improved fit consistency over time, emphasizing the importance of regular education. Rather than testing annually, targeted testing when selecting a new respirator or performing subsequent facial changes may enhance the protection of HCWs and reduce costs.

Purpose: The use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT) is becoming increasingly common among men with prostate cancer (PCa). However, it remains uncertain which patients will derive the most benefit, and there is a scarcity of real-world data regarding its impact on altering treatment plans. This study investigated which patients would most benefit from Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT, focusing on detection rates and changes in treatment strategies, drawing from a single-center experience. Materials and Methods: In total, 230 men with PCa who underwent Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT between November 2021 and August 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into 5 groups based on their disease status: group 1, further work-up for high-risk localized PCa; group 2, de novo metastatic PCa; group 3, biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment; group 4, castration-resistant PCa; group 5, others. The positivity rate, positive lesions, predictive value of lymph node metastases, comparison with conventional images, and treatment changes after Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT were analyzed in each group. Results: Of the 230 patients, 40 (17.4%), 20 (8.7%), 77 (33.5%), 76 (33.0%), and 17 (7.4%) were classified into groups 1–5, respectively. Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT showed lesions in 74.8% of patients, and the optimal cutoff value for PSA was 1.99 ng/mL. Lesions not observed on conventional imaging were found in 62 patients (33.2%). In 38 patients (13.5%), treatment was changed due to Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT. Conclusions These real-world data suggest that Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT may be clinically useful for various disease conditions, as substantial stage migration and subsequent treatment changes occur in men with PCa. However, the prognostic impact of this modality remains unclear; thus, a well-designed prospective study is needed to address this issue.

Background: Hand hygiene is considered the simplest and most cost-effective method of infection prevention. Regular observation and feedback on hand hygiene compliance are key strategies for its enhancement. This study evaluated the effectiveness of hand hygiene surveillance, including direct observation and feedback, by comprehensively analyzing the reported hand hygiene compliance within the Korean National Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance System from 2019 to 2022. Methods: Participating medical institutions included general hospitals and hospitals with infection control departments that consented to participate. Hand hygiene surveillance was conducted using direct observation. Collected data, including healthcare workers, clinical areas, hand hygiene moments, and hand hygiene compliance, were recorded to calculate hand hygiene compliance rates. Additionally, the volume of alcohol-based hand sanitizers used per patient per day was investigated as an indirect indicator of hand hygiene compliance. The study was conducted from July 2019 to December 2022. Results: Hand hygiene compliance increased from 87.2% in Q3 2019 to 89.9% in 2022. Nurses and medical technologists showed the highest compliance rates, whereas doctors showed the lowest compliance rates. Intensive care units excelled in compliance, whereas emergency de partments lagged. Compliance was highest after patient contact and lowest when the patient’s surroundings were touched. Larger hospitals consumed more alcohol-based hand sanitizers than smaller hospitals did. Conclusion This study confirmed an improvement in hand hygiene compliance through sustained surveillance, indicating its contribution not only to preventing infection transfer within healthcare facilities but also to fostering a culture of hand hygiene in the country.