1.Sarcopenic obesity and mortality risk in nursing home residents: a prospective cohort study based on six obesity indicators
Xiaoyan CHEN ; Mei LI ; Sha HUANG ; Shuyue LUO ; Wenyi ZHANG ; Wenhua JIANG ; Ming YANG
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics 2025;44(7):943-950
Objective:To investigate the relationship between sarcopenic obesity(SO), defined by various obesity indicators, and mortality risk in older adults based on a prospective cohort from multiple nursing homes.Methods:Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the 2019 consensus of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia.Obesity was defined using six different indicators: waist circumference(WC), waist-hip ratio(WHR), waist-height ratio(WHTR), body mass index(BMI), visceral fat area(VFA), and percentage of body fat(PBF).A prospective cohort of adults aged 60 and above was established across 15 nursing homes in Zigong City, with annual follow-ups on survival status conducted over two consecutive years.Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to analyze the association between SO, defined by different obesity indicators, and mortality risk, calculating hazard ratios( HR)and their 95% confidence intervals( CI). Results:A total of 695 older adults were included in the study, of whom 67.1% were male.During the 2-year follow-up period, 88 participants died.The prevalence of SO as defined by WC, WHR, WHTR, BMI, VFA, PBF was found to be 17.6%, 30.1%, 48.9%, 3.0%, 28.3%, and 58.7%, respectively.When SO was defined using WC, WHR, WHTR, BMI, and VFA, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the SO and non-SO groups.However, when defined by PBF, the SO group exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate compared to the non-SO group(16.9% vs.6.6%, P<0.01).Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that, compared to the non-SO group, the SO group defined by PBF had a significantly increased mortality risk( HR=2.81, 95% CI: 1.67-4.73, P<0.001).After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the mortality risk for the SO group remained significantly higher than that of the non-SO group( HR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.14-3.38, P=0.015). Conclusions:The prevalence of SO varies significantly across different obesity indicators.SO defined by PBF is significantly associated with mortality risk in nursing home residents.This study provides new evidence for further optimizing the diagnostic criteria for SO in this population.
2.Sarcopenic obesity and mortality risk in nursing home residents: a prospective cohort study based on six obesity indicators
Xiaoyan CHEN ; Mei LI ; Sha HUANG ; Shuyue LUO ; Wenyi ZHANG ; Wenhua JIANG ; Ming YANG
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics 2025;44(7):943-950
Objective:To investigate the relationship between sarcopenic obesity(SO), defined by various obesity indicators, and mortality risk in older adults based on a prospective cohort from multiple nursing homes.Methods:Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the 2019 consensus of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia.Obesity was defined using six different indicators: waist circumference(WC), waist-hip ratio(WHR), waist-height ratio(WHTR), body mass index(BMI), visceral fat area(VFA), and percentage of body fat(PBF).A prospective cohort of adults aged 60 and above was established across 15 nursing homes in Zigong City, with annual follow-ups on survival status conducted over two consecutive years.Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to analyze the association between SO, defined by different obesity indicators, and mortality risk, calculating hazard ratios( HR)and their 95% confidence intervals( CI). Results:A total of 695 older adults were included in the study, of whom 67.1% were male.During the 2-year follow-up period, 88 participants died.The prevalence of SO as defined by WC, WHR, WHTR, BMI, VFA, PBF was found to be 17.6%, 30.1%, 48.9%, 3.0%, 28.3%, and 58.7%, respectively.When SO was defined using WC, WHR, WHTR, BMI, and VFA, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the SO and non-SO groups.However, when defined by PBF, the SO group exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate compared to the non-SO group(16.9% vs.6.6%, P<0.01).Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that, compared to the non-SO group, the SO group defined by PBF had a significantly increased mortality risk( HR=2.81, 95% CI: 1.67-4.73, P<0.001).After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the mortality risk for the SO group remained significantly higher than that of the non-SO group( HR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.14-3.38, P=0.015). Conclusions:The prevalence of SO varies significantly across different obesity indicators.SO defined by PBF is significantly associated with mortality risk in nursing home residents.This study provides new evidence for further optimizing the diagnostic criteria for SO in this population.
3.CT measured parameters of upper airway in OSAHS patients
Maogu LU ; Dongsheng MIAO ; Wei LUO ; Shuyue AI ; Ying ZHAO ; Jianwei WU
Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2006;0(07):-
OBJECTIVE To explore the value of spiral CT in detecting narrow level of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS) through investigating measured parameters of upper airway. METHODS The upper airway levels from the roof of nasopharynx to the inferior border of cricoid cartilage were scanned with spiral CT in 127 OSAHS patients and 52 controls.The coronal and sagittal diameter and the cross sectional areas of palate,uvula,tongue, epiglottis level were measured using image handling workstation.The measured values of each level were divided by the measured values of the cricoid cartilage level,and get relative values.The relative values of the OSAHS patients and controls were compared. RESULTS The relative values of posterior soft palate and uvula region,lingual region and epiglottis regions were statistically different.The difference also existed between genders.The relative values of 46 controls and 17 OSAHS patients were in the normal range. Among 127 OSAHS,the relative values of 110 cases with OSAHS(86.6%) were below the normal range in every region,while in control group,the relative values were found below the normal range in only 6 persons (11.2%).CONCLUSION The relative values of each regions is useful to judge the narrow level of upper airway in OSAHS patients.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail