ObjectiveThis paper aims to investigate and evaluate the staged efficacy and safety of the representative empirical prescription of the “Zhu Ke Jiao” theory， Qijia Rougan prescription， combined with entecavir in the treatment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. MethodsA multicenter randomized controlled clinical study was conducted， and 101 patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B-related hepatic fibrosis （CHB-HF） who met the diagnosis and inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to an observation group （Qijia Rougan prescription + entecavir） and a control group （entecavir）. The treatment duration was 24 weeks. Liver stiffness measurement （LSM）， fibrosis-4 index （FIB-4）， portal vein diameter， hepatitis B serology， biochemical indicators， hepatic fibrosis markers in serum ［hyaluronic acid （HA）， laminin （LN）， procollagen Ⅲ peptide （PⅢP）， and type Ⅳ collagen （Ⅳ-C）］， and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores were used as efficacy evaluation indicators. Efficacy assessments and explorations of different staged subgroups of Qijia Rougan prescription were conducted according to LSM values based on the Metavir pathological staging standard. ResultsA total of 98 cases were included for statistical analysis， with 49 cases in the observation group and 49 in the control group. The general data of the patients in both groups were comparable. Compared with the same group before treatment， the observation group showed a significant reduction in LSM and FIB-4 （P<0.01）， as well as notable improvements in LN， Ⅳ-C， and various TCM syndrome scores （P<0.05， P<0.01）. When compared to the control group after treatment， the observation group demonstrated significant improvements in LSM， FIB-4， and various TCM syndrome score indicators （P<0.05， P<0.01）， indicating that the observation group performed better than the control group. Subgroup analysis of the regression of hepatic fibrosis stages showed that compared to the same group before treatment， the observation group had better improvement in regression of stages F2 and F3 （P<0.05）. When compared to the control group after treatment， the observation group exhibited superior improvement in regression of stage F3 （P<0.05）. No adverse events occurred in either group during the treatment period. ConclusionCompared with entecavir alone， the combination of Qijia Rougan prescription and entecavir significantly improves the degree of hepatic fibrosis and clinical TCM symptoms in patients. The optimal intervention period is primarily during stage F3， which is a potential “interception” point of the “Zhu Ke Jiao” theory.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

Objective It aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for cancer multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment(MDT)model in China from a full process perspective,providing guidance for practical application and model optimization.Methods Based on the number of MDT publications and practical situations,20 provincial-level hospitals nationwide were selected as typical cases.Rooted theory was used to extract evaluation indicators from the original text of the cases through three-level coding.A cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed under the Input-Process-Output framework.Results Through three-level coding,27 initial categories,8 subcategories,and 3 main categories were sorted out,and a cancer MDT quality evaluation index system was constructed with input,process,and output as the primary evaluation indicators,and top-level design,management system,object resources,meeting preparation,meeting progress,plan implementation,patient outcomes,and hospital outcomes as the secondary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system of cancer MDT mode based on the perspective of the entire process can effectively guide practical optimization,but there is still a need for the improvement of supporting policies and information systems to assist in quality evaluation.

BackgroundPsychological capital has a significant impact on individual post-traumatic growth and well-being. However， there is limited research on the psychological capital and its related factors among parents of children with leukemia. ObjectiveTo explore the psychological capital status of parents of children with leukemia and analyze its influencing factors， in order to provide references for formulating intervention strategies to improve the psychological capital among these parents. MethodsFrom March 2021 to April 2022， 143 parents of children diagnosed with leukemia from the Department of Pediatrics at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University was selected. The general demographic information questionnaire， Positive Psychological Capital Questionnaire （PPQ）， Chinese-Posttraumatic Growth Inventory （C-PTGI） and Index of Well-being Scale （IWB） were used to investigate the participants. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of psychological capital. ResultsThe PPQ total score for parents of children with leukemia was （113.48±15.80）. The PPQ total score showed positive correlations with the scores of C-PTGI and IWB （r=0.727， 0.598， P<0.01）. The course of children's illness （β=0.136， P=0.017）， parental education level （β=0.139， P=0.012） and C-PTGI score （β=0.622， P<0.01） were influencing factors of psychological capital among these parents， collectively explaining 57.6% of the total variability. ConclusionThe level of positive psychological capital among parents of children with leukemia warrants improvement. Factors including course of the children's illness， parental education level and post-traumatic growth significantly impacted their psychological capital.［Funded by Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project for Graduate Students of Xinjiang Medical University （number， CXCY2022047）］