OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cefiderocol versus best available therapy （BAT） or standard-of- care （SOC） for the treatment of confirmed or suspected carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial （CRGNB） serious infections from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system， and to explore its reasonable pricing. METHODS A decision tree model was constructed based on data from two phase Ⅲ clinical trials （CREDIBLE-CR and GAME CHANGER） to simulate the cost- effectiveness of cefiderocol in two scenarios： salvage therapy for confirmed CRGNB infection （scenario 1） and empirical therapy for suspected CRGNB infection （scenario 2）. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）. The willingness-to-pay （WTP） was set at 1 to 3 times China’s per capita GDP in 2024. To verify the robustness of the results， one- way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted， and based on these， a reasonable price range for cefiderocol in the Chinese market was explored. RESULTS The results for scenario 1 showed that the clinical cure rate in the cefiderocol group was higher than that in the BAT group （47.50% vs. 34.21%）， but its ICER was 415 065.03 yuan per cured case， exceeding three times China’s GDP per capita. Scenario 2 revealed that the ICER for cefiderocol relative to SOC was as high as 1 362 446.16 yuan per cured case， far exceeding the WTP. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the treatment duration and price of cefiderocol were key factors affecting its cost-effectiveness. In the two scenarios described above， the unit price of cefiderocol must fall below 683.47 and 242.00 yuan/g， respectively， to be considered cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current market price， cefiderocol lacks sufficient cost-effectiveness for treating confirmed or suspected CRGNB serious infections within China’s healthcare system. To improve its accessibility， price negotiations or a tiered medical insurance payment strategy are required.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy,safety and economy of sugemalimab in the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)by rapid health technology assessment.Methods PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,WanFang Data,VIP and official websites of health technology assessment(HTA)institutions were systematically searched to collect HTA reports,systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic studies of sugemalimab in first-line treatment of NSCLC from inception to October 31,2024.Two reviewers independently screened the literature,extracted information and performed quality assessment of the included studies,and then performed descriptive analysis on the results.Results A total of 15 articles were selected,including 4 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and 11 pharmacoeconomic studies.In terms of effectiveness,compared with chemotherapy alone,sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),and objective response rate(ORR)in patients with NSCLC.In terms of safety,compared with chemotherapy alone,sugemalimab combined chemotherapy had higher incidence of overall adverse events,but it had a better safety profile compared to other immune combination therapies.In terms of economy,most studies suggested that compared with chemotherapy alone,sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy was not cost-effective,which may be related to the high price of sugemalimab.However,a few studies indicated that sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy could be cost-effective in specific scenarios.Conclusion Sugemalimab has good efficacy in the first-line treatment of NSCLC,but its safety and economy need to be further studied.

Indocyanine green(ICG)is one of the near-infrared fluorescent contrast agents approved for clinical use in fluorescence-guided surgery.Although widely applied,it still has some limitations.In recent years,various targeted fluorescent agents have been explored in pancreatic cancer patients;however,there is still no standardized consensus among surgeons regarding fluorescence-guided surgery for pancreatic cancer.In 2023,the first the international consensus report on fluorescent surgery navigation for pancreatic tumors was published,gathering perspectives from 38 pancreatic surgeons worldwide on current practices and future directions.A total of 76 statements were anonymously voted on using the Delphi method,resulting in 61 recommended statements.This consensus offers valuable guidance for the implementation of fluorescence-guided surgery in pancreatic tumor operations in China,yet its clinical application should be adapted in consideration of local expert opinions and patient-specific factors.This article interprets key aspects of the consensus,including the use of ICG,intraoperative fluorescence imaging techniques,and the fluorescence heterogeneity of pancreatic tumors,in combination with the authors'clinical experience,with the aim of providing reference and insight for the application of fluorescence-guided surgery in pancreatic tumors.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy,safety,and economic efficiency of toripalimab therapy for advanced esophageal cancer by rapid health technology assessment(rHTA),so as to provide clinical reference for drug use.Methods PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,WanFang Data,VIP databases and official websites of health technology assessment institutions were electronically searched to collect high-quality clinical evidence and economic evaluation literature of toripalimab therapy for advanced esophageal cancer from inception to September 30,2025.Two reviewers independently identified studies,extracted data,assessed the quality of included studies,then the results were summarised and analysed using qualitative descriptive methods.Results A total of 18 articles were included,including 9 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and 9 economic studies.In terms of efficacy,compared with the simple chemotherapy regimen,the combination chemotherapy regimen of toripalimab could significantly prolong the overall survival(OS)and progression free survival(PFS)of patients with advanced esophageal cancer,while improving the objective response rate(ORR)of patients.In terms of safety,there was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and overall adverse events between combination chemotherapy with toripalimab and chemotherapy alone.Moreover,compared with other immunotherapy combination therapies,the incidence of adverse events in combination chemotherapy with toripalimab was lower.In terms of economy,the combination of toripalimab and chemotherapy not only improves the clinical symptoms of advanced esophageal cancer patients,but also offers economic advantages.Conclusion Toripalimab is effective,safe and economical in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy,safety and economy of sugemalimab in the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)by rapid health technology assessment.Methods PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,WanFang Data,VIP and official websites of health technology assessment(HTA)institutions were systematically searched to collect HTA reports,systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic studies of sugemalimab in first-line treatment of NSCLC from inception to October 31,2024.Two reviewers independently screened the literature,extracted information and performed quality assessment of the included studies,and then performed descriptive analysis on the results.Results A total of 15 articles were selected,including 4 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and 11 pharmacoeconomic studies.In terms of effectiveness,compared with chemotherapy alone,sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),and objective response rate(ORR)in patients with NSCLC.In terms of safety,compared with chemotherapy alone,sugemalimab combined chemotherapy had higher incidence of overall adverse events,but it had a better safety profile compared to other immune combination therapies.In terms of economy,most studies suggested that compared with chemotherapy alone,sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy was not cost-effective,which may be related to the high price of sugemalimab.However,a few studies indicated that sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy could be cost-effective in specific scenarios.Conclusion Sugemalimab has good efficacy in the first-line treatment of NSCLC,but its safety and economy need to be further studied.

Objective:To assess the precision of various automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin before and after the update of the breakpoints by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Methods:A total of 65 strains of Enterobacterales (34 Escherichia coli and 31 Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 33 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were collected from Peking University People′s Hospital, Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in 2023. Broth microdilution (BMD) was employed as the reference method to assess the accuracy of ten antimicrobial susceptibility panels (NMIC-413, GN09, N335, NMIC45, GN4F, NMIC-150, DL-120E, DL-120NE, ONE-96 and NF-96) in seven automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems currently utilized in China. Results:Except for the GN-09, N-335, and NMIC-150, there were breakpoints that were not covered for the minimum inhibitory concentrations reported by the other panels in the validation. There was no very major error (VME) in the verification results except for the cases of not covered. Among the 65 strains of Enterobacterales, the essential agreement rate (EA%) of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was higher than 92.3% (60/65), and the categorical agreement rate (CA%) of ciprofloxacin using the new breakpoint decreased from 100% (65/65)-98.5% (64/65) to 95.4% (62/65)-86.2% (56/65). The major error rate (ME%) of N-335 card increased from 1.5% (1/65) to 4.6% (3/65); except for GN-09 and N-335 cards, the CA% of other cards under new breakpoint was ≥96.9% (63/65) with no ME; the EA% of piperacillin/tazobactam was ≥93.8% (61/65), and the CA% under new breakpoint was ≥92.3% (60/65), and the ME% of N-335 card increased from 1.5% (1/65) to 4.6% (3/65). The EA% and CA% under new breakpoint of amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin were all ≥ 96.9% (63/65) with no ME. Among the 33 tested Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, the EA% of ciprofloxacin was ≥93.8% (30/32), and after applying the new breakpoints, the CA% of ciprofloxacin decreased from 90.6% (29/32)-100% (33/33) to 84.4% (27/32)-100% (33/33). On the NMIC-413 card, 2 strains showed ME. For levofloxacin, the EA% was ≥90.9% (30/33), and the CA% of the new breakpoint interpretation decreasing from 90.6% (29/32)-100% to 69.7% (23/33)-93.8% (30/32), with no ME. For amikacin and tobramycin, the EA% was ≥93.8% (30/32), and on most panels, the CA% of new breakpoints for amikacin and tobramycin were ≥96.9% (31/32).Conclusions:At present, the breakpoints cannot be covered by the panels in many automated antimicrobial sensitivity testing systems in China. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin did not meet the validation requirements for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in most antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems. After the breakpoints updated, it is essential to validate the automated antimicrobial susceptibility system for clinical application.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-utiliby of capivasertib combined with fulvestrant for the second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative （HR+/HER2－） advanced breast cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS A partitioned survival model was constructed using clinical data from the CAPItello-291 trial. Costs and quality-adjusted life years （QALYs） were used as the output indicators of the model， and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER） was used as the evaluation indicator of the model. Using three times the per capita gross domestic product （GDP） of China in 2024 as the willingness-to-pay threshold （WTP）， this study analyzed the cost-utility of capivasertib combined with fulvestrant versus fulvestrant monotherapy in the treatment of HR+/HER2－ advanced breast cancer， and conducted sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis under conditions where the price of capivasertib was reduced by 50%， 60%， 70% and 95%， respectively. RESULTS The results of the basic analysis showed that compared with the fulvestrant monotherapy regimen， the ICER of capivasertib combined with fulvestrant was 843 038.46 yuan/QALY， which was higher than the WTP（287 247 yuan/QALY）. The one-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the top three factors with the most substantial influence on ICER were the utility value in the progression disease state， the price of capivasertib， and the utility value inthe progression free survival state. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the basic analysis results. Scenario analysis revealed that even if the price of capivasertib were reduced by 95%， capivasertib combined with fulvestrant did not exhibit cost-effectiveness at the current WTP. CONCLUSION At a WTP of three times China’s GDP per capita in 2024， compared to fulvestrant monotherapy， capivasertib combined with fulvestrant as the second-line treatment for HR+/ HER2－ advanced breast cancer is not cost-effective.

Objective To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of knee osteoarthritis(KOA)among military personnel in plateau regions and to explore its risk factors.Methods From July 2023 to July 2024,a multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling method was employed to survey the prevalence of KOA and related risk factors among military personnel in the northwest plateau regions of China,covering different altitudes(1500-4500 m)and geographical areas(Gansu,Qinghai,Tibet,and Xinjiang).All study subjects were divided into KOA and non-KOA groups based on the presence or absence of KOA.Variables including age,gender,body mass index(BMI),education level,smoking status,military rank,military branch,service duration,regional altitude,annual average temperature,training duration,perceived training intensity,and history of knee injury were selected for univariate analyses between groups.Variables with P<0.05 in the univariate analyses were included in the binary multifactor logistic regression to identify risk factors for KOA.Results A total of 3000 questionnaires were distributed,and 2854 valid questionnaires were collected,with a response rate of 95.13%.The sample included 2584 males and 270 females,with 510 cases of KOA,resulting in a prevalence rate of 17.9%.Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between KOA and non-KOA groups in terms of age,BMI,smoking status,military rank,military branch,service duration,regional altitude,annual average temperature,training duration,perceived training intensity,and history of knee injury(P<0.05).However,no significant differences were found in gender and education level(P>0.05).Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age(OR=1.382,P=0.017),higher BMI(P<0.01),smoking(OR=1.929,P<0.01),higher military rank(OR=1.485,P=0.007),being a member of the Armed Police(P<0.01),longer service duration(P<0.01),higher regional altitude(OR=1.459,P<0.01),lower annual average temperature(OR=1.188,P=0.001),longer training duration(P<0.01),higher perceived training intensity(OR=2.450,P<0.01),and history of knee injury(OR=2.768,P=0.002)were independent risk factors for KOA.Conclusions Older age,overweight/obesity,smoking,higher military rank,being a member of the Armed Police,longer service duration,higher altitude,cold climate,longer training duration,higher training intensity,and history of knee injury are independent risk factors for KOA among military personnel in the northwest plateau regions of China.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy， safety and cost-effectiveness of serplulimab as a first-line treatment of small- cell lung cancer （SCLC）， and provide an evidence-based basis for drug selection in hospitals. METHODS Rapid health technology assessment was adopted； PubMed， Cochrane Library， Embase， CNKI， Wanfang， VIP and official websites of domestic and international health technology assessment agencies were systematically searched from the inception to Oct. 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the literature， assessed the quality of included studies and carried out the qualitative analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS A total of 13 systematic reviews/meta-analyses and 9 economic studies were included， and the literature quality was generally good. In terms of effectiveness， compared with chemotherapy alone， serplulimab combined with chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival， overall survival， and objective response rate in patients with SCLC. In terms of safety， serplulimab combined with chemotherapy showed no significant difference in the incidence of ≥3 grade adverse events compared with chemotherapy alone in the treatment of SCLC， indicating a good safety profile； compared with combination therapies involving other immunosuppressive agents， the incidence rate of adverse events was also lower. In terms of cost-effectiveness， compared with chemotherapy alone， serplulimab combined with chemotherapy is not cost- effective， which may be related to the high price of serplulimab. CONCLUSIONS Serplulimab is effective and safe in the treatment of SCLC， but has no obvious advantage in terms of cost-effectiveness.