Objective To discuss the safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)combined with apatinib and carizolizumab in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)with major portal vein tumor thrombosis(Vp4).Methods The clinical data of patients with HCC complicated by Vp4 from three certain Grade Ⅲ medical centers,who received HAIC combined with apatinib and carizolizumab(triple treatment group)or received HAIC alone(simple HAIC group)from July 2018 to December 2023,were retrospectively collected.Propensity score matching(PSM)was used to balance the general differences between groups,and the pre-PSM and post-PSM overall survival time(OS),progression-free survival time(PFS),and tumor response rate were compared between the two groups.Based on COX proportional hazards regression model the survival-related risk factors were identified.The clinical safety was evaluated by comparing the incidence of adverse reactions between different therapeutic regimens.Results In the overall cohort,the median OS and median PFS in the triple treatment group were 16.4 months and 9.1 months respectively,which in the simple HAIC group were 6.9 months and 4.2 months respectively(both P＜0.001).In the triple treatment group and the simple HAIC group,the objective response rate(ORR)was 41.2％and 15.2％respectively(P＜0.001),and the disease control rate(DCR)was 77.9％and 68.5％respectively(P=0.185).In the PSM cohort,the median OS and median PFS in the triple treatment group were 16.4 months and 9.1 months respectively,which were significantly longer than 7.4 months and 3.7 months respectively in the simple HAIC group.In the triple treatment group and the simple HAIC group,the ORR was 39.5％and 11.6％respectively(P=0.003),and the DCR was 81.4％and 62.8％respectively(P=0.054).Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that HAIC combined with apatinib and carizolizumab treatment was an independent factor influencing both OS and PFS.No statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions of all levels existed between the two groups,although the incidence of some adverse reactions in triple therapy group was higher than that in the simple HAIC group.Conclusion Compared with pure HAIC therapy,HAIC combined with apatinib and carizolizumab has better survival benefits and tumor response rate,it is clinically safe and effective,besides,the patients can well tolerate this treatment.Therefore,HAIC combined with apatinib and carizolizumab is a promising treatment option for patients with HCC complicated by Vp4.

OBJECTIVETo compare the difference of clinical efficacy on sleeping disorder in the children with encephalopathy between the combined therapy of acupuncture at head points and seed-pressure at ear points and the simple acupuncture at head points.

METHODSThirty cases of sleeping disorder induced by encephalopathy werei randomized into an observation group and a control group, 15 cases in each one. In the observation group, the combined therapy of acupuncture at head points and seed-pressure at ear points was adopted. The head points in cluded Sishencong (EX-HN 1), Shenting (GV 24) and Benshen (GB 13). The ear points were the positive reactive sites in the cymba and cavum conchae. In the control group, acupuncture was applied simply to the acupoints on the head. The treatment was given once on every Tuesday and Friday a week separately, 30 min each time. Totally, 16 treatments were required. Children's sleeping habit questionnaire (CSHQ) was used to observe the sleep improvements and the efficacy in the patients of the two groups.

RESULTSIn the observation group, the results of sleep resistance, sleep anxiety, night sleep wake, parasomnias, sleep dyspnea, daytime somnolence and the total score after treatment were all improved apparently as compared with those before treatment (all P<0. 05). In the control group, the results of night sleep wake, parasomnias, daytime somnolence and the total score after treatment were improved apparently than those before treatment (all P<0. 05). In the observation group, the results of sleep resistance, sleep dyspnea and the total score after treatment were better than those in the control group (all P<0. 05) and the scores of sleep anxiety and daytime somnolence in the control group were better than those in the observation group after treatment (both P<0. 05).

CONCLUSIONThe combined therapy of acupuncture at head points and seed-pressure at the positive reactive sites in the cymba and cavum conchae achieves the superior efficacy on sleep resistance and sleep dyspnea as compared with the simple acupuncture. The efficacy of simple acupuncture is more satisfactory on sleep anxiety and daytime somnolence.

Acupuncture Points ; Acupuncture Therapy ; Acupuncture, Ear ; Brain Diseases ; complications ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Sleep ; Sleep Wake Disorders ; etiology ; physiopathology ; therapy