OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of data obtained from liquid-interference surfaces using an intraoral 3D scanner (IOS) integrated with a compressed airflow system, so as to provide clinical proof of accuracy for the application of the compressed airflow system-based scanning head in improving data quality on liquid-interference surfaces. METHODS: The study selected a standard model as the scanning object, adhering to the "YY/T 1818-2022 Dental Science Intraoral Digital Impression Scanner" guidelines, a standard that defined parameters for intraoral scanning. To establish a baseline for accuracy, the ATOS Q 12M scanner, known for its high precision, was used to generate true reference values. These true values served as the benchmark for evaluating the IOS performance. Building on the design of an existing scanner, a new scanning head was developed to integrate with a compressed airflow system. This new design aimed to help the IOS capture high-precision data on surfaces where liquid-interference, such as saliva, might otherwise degrade scanning accuracy. The traditional scanning method, without airflow assistance, was employed as a control group for comparison. The study included five groups in total, one control group and four experimental groups, to investigate the effects of scanning lens obstruction, airflow presence, liquid media, and the use of the new scanning head on scanning process and accuracy. Each group underwent 15 scans, generating ample data for a robust statistical comparison. By evaluating trueness and precision in each group, the study assessed the impact of the compressed airflow system on the accuracy of IOS data collected from liquid-interference surfaces. Additionally, we selected Elite and Primescan scanners as references for numerical accuracy values. RESULTS: The scanning accuracy on liquid-interference surfaces was significantly reduced in terms of both trueness and precision [Trueness: 18.5 (6.5) vs. 38.0 (6.7), P < 0.05; Precision: 19.1 (8.5) vs. 31.7 (15.0), P < 0.05]. The use of the new scanning head assisted by the compressed airflow system significantly improved the scanning accuracy [Trueness: 22.3(7.6) vs. 38.0 (6.7), P < 0.05; Precision: 25.8 (9.6) vs. 31.7 (15.0), P < 0.05]. CONCLUSION The scanning head based on the compressed airflow system can assist in improving the accuracy of data obtained from liquid-interference surfaces by the IOS.
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods* ; Humans ; Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation*

Humans ; Staphylococcus lugdunensis/genetics* ; Peptides, Cyclic ; Chromosomes ; Operon/genetics* ; Staphylococcal Infections/genetics* ; Bacterial Proteins/genetics* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents

Objective To explore the feasibility of gastroesophagostomy when patients with esophagus carcinoma com bined with stomach carcinoma.Methods In March 2011 to May 2016,our department completed with the method of genera tion of esophagus stomach in the treatment of esophageal cancer merger 18 cases of gastric cancer patients.Age 52-67,16 ca ses of esophageal lesions located in the middle section,2 cases located in the chest.4 cases were gastric lesions located in the proximal stomach,14 cases were located in the distal stomach Four kinds of surgical methods can be chosen from.Proximal or distal stomach could be used to replace esophagus and the blood supply came from left gastric artery or right gastroepiploic artery.Stomach tissue separation and reverse gastric tube were used if the length of stomach was insufficieut.Results When resection of esophageal and gastric carcinoma were accomplished simultaneously,residue stomach can be used as a replacement of esophagus if patients were rigidly selected.Conclusion Residue stomach was a good substitute after radical resection of esoph agus and gastric dual-source carcinoma.Patients chosen and surgery design were both important.

Clinical experiments are always used to evaluate the safety and validity of medical devices. The experiments have two types of clinical trying and testing. Ethic review must be done by the ethics committee of the medical department with the qualification of clinical research, and the approval must be made before the experiments. In order to ensure the safety and validity of clinical experiments of medical devices in medical institutions, the contents, process and approval criterions of the ethic review were analyzed and discussed.
Biomedical Research ; ethics ; Equipment and Supplies ; ethics ; Ethical Review ; Humans

BACKGROUNDTo study the significance of pneumonectomy via intrapericardial vascular management in the surgical treatment of lung cancer.

METHODSA total of 56 patients with central-type lung cancer underwent pneumonectomy via intrapericardial vascular management.

RESULTSThe incidence of postoperative complications was 8.93%(5/56). One patient died and the mortality rate was 1.97%. The postoperative follow up rate was 96.4%. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 72.7%(40/55), 31.4%(11/35) and 17.4% (4/23) respectively.

CONCLUSIONSPneumonectomy via intrapericardial vascular management is safe and can improve the resection rate. It might provide a basis for the further treatment of lung cancer and should be widely applied.