Objective: To evaluate and compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for complete surgical staging, including sentinel lymph node mapping. Methods: A retrospective study included 190 patients diagnosed with low-risk endometrial cancer who underwent MIS combined with sentinel lymph node navigation surgery (SNNS) between December 2016 and December 2021. Among these patients, 66 underwent laparoscopic surgery, while 124 underwent robotic-assisted surgery. The analysis focused on patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and prognostic factors, including recurrencefree survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and appropriate comparative tests for outcome evaluation. Results: The median operative time and estimated blood loss were significantly longer and greater in the robotic surgery group than in the laparoscopic group (209.5 vs. 157.5 min, 20 vs. 5 mL, respectively). The identification rates of sentinel nodes were 97% and 95.2% in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively, with no significant difference between the 2.Recurrence was observed in two and three cases in the laparoscopic robotic surgery groups, respectively. The 3-year RFS rates were 97.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.8482–0.9769) and 93.9% (95% CI=0.9277–0.9922) for the robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively, while the 3-year OS rates were 99.2% (95% CI=0.8561–0.9902) and 96.1% (95% CI=0.9450– 0.9989), respectively, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusion MIS combined with SNNS is a highly effective approach for managing low-risk endometrial cancer, providing comparable oncologic outcomes to laparoscopy while enhancing the quality of life of patients.

Objective: This study aimed to validate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery with sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) in endometrial cancer. Methods: This study included 130 patients with endometrial cancer, who underwent robotic surgery, including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic SNNS at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Kagoshima University Hospital. Pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified using the uterine cervix 99m Technetium-labeled phytate and indocyanine green injections. Surgery-related and survival outcomes were also evaluated. Results: The median operative and console times and volume of blood loss were 204 (range: 101–555) minutes, 152 (range: 70–453) minutes, and 20 (range: 2–620) mL, respectively. The bilateral and unilateral pelvic SLN detection rates were 90.0% (117/130) and 5.4% (7/130), respectively, and the identification rate (the rate at which at least one SLN could be identified on either side) was 95% (124/130). Lower extremity lymphedema occurred in only 1 patient (0.8%), and no pelvic lymphocele occurred. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients (2.3%), and the recurrence site was the abdominal cavity, with dissemination in 2 patients and vaginal stump in one. The 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival rates were 97.1% and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion Robotic surgery with SNNS for endometrial cancer showed a high SLN identification rate, low occurrence rates of lower extremity lymphedema and pelvic lymphocele, and excellent oncologic outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay for the diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis in uterine cancer. Methods: A total of 116 LNs from 30 patients with cervical and endometrial cancer, enrolled in this prospective study, were used. Excised LNs were cut into 4 to 6 blocks at 2 mm intervals, and nonadjacent blocks were alternately subjected to either histological examination or the OSNA assay. Results: The concordance rate between histological examination and the OSNA assay in cervical cancer and in endometrial cancer was 95.9% and 95.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the OSNA assay were 80%, 97.7%, and 97.7% in cervical cancer, and 85.7%, 93.3%, and 98.2% in endometrial cancer, respectively. In cervical cancer, discordant results were observed in 2 out of 49 LNs (4.1%); 1 was OSNA assay-positive and histological examination-negative, and 1 was OSNA assay-negative and histological examination-positive. In endometrial cancer, discordant results were observed in 5 out of 67 LNs (7.5%); 4 were OSNA assay-positive and histological examination-negative, and 1 was OSNA assay-negative and histological examination-positive. Conclusion The OSNA assay showed high concordance rate with histological examination, sensitivity, and specificity in uterine cancer, suggesting that it could enhance the accuracy of conventional pathological examination for the detection of LN metastasis by reducing false negative rate.