Objective:To explore the feasibility and safety of the combined liver and kidney procurement technique with preservation of the donor diaphragm.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 135 donors with pulmonary infection who underwent combined liver and kidney procurement and their corresponding 370 recipients in the Department of Transplantation, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2021 to August 2023. According to whether the donor diaphragm was resected during procurement, the donors were divided into diaphragm preservation group (67 cases) and diaphragm resection group (68 cases). The t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the baseline characteristics of the donors, donor procurement time, surgical injury to organs, donor-derived infection (DDI), delayed graft function (DGF), primary non-function (PNF), and perioperative death between the two groups.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, number of organs procured, number of organs transplanted, number of organs discarded, or positive rate of sputum cultures for different strains between the two groups (all P>0.05). The donor procurement time was (46.70±12.61) min in the diaphragm preservation group and (45.79±12.78) min in the diaphragm resection group, with no statistically significant difference ( P=0.679). No surgical injuries to other abdominal organs (such as intestines or, in the diaphragm resection group, the lungs) occurred during procurement. After transplantation, the incidence of delayed graft function in kidney recipients was 7.32% (9/123) in the diaphragm preservation group and 11.67% (14/120) in the diaphragm resection group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.279). The incidence of DDI was 0 in the diaphragm preservation group and 7.07% (13/184) in the diaphragm resection group, showing a statistically significant difference ( P<0.001). No cases of primary non-function or perioperative death occurred in either group. Conclusion:Compared with the conventional method, the combined liver and kidney procurement technique that preserves the donor diaphragm does not significantly increase operative time, organ injury, delayed graft function, primary non-function, or perioperative mortality. It significantly reduces the incidence of donor-derived infections and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Objective:To explore the feasibility and safety of the combined liver and kidney procurement technique with preservation of the donor diaphragm.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 135 donors with pulmonary infection who underwent combined liver and kidney procurement and their corresponding 370 recipients in the Department of Transplantation, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2021 to August 2023. According to whether the donor diaphragm was resected during procurement, the donors were divided into diaphragm preservation group (67 cases) and diaphragm resection group (68 cases). The t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the baseline characteristics of the donors, donor procurement time, surgical injury to organs, donor-derived infection (DDI), delayed graft function (DGF), primary non-function (PNF), and perioperative death between the two groups.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, number of organs procured, number of organs transplanted, number of organs discarded, or positive rate of sputum cultures for different strains between the two groups (all P>0.05). The donor procurement time was (46.70±12.61) min in the diaphragm preservation group and (45.79±12.78) min in the diaphragm resection group, with no statistically significant difference ( P=0.679). No surgical injuries to other abdominal organs (such as intestines or, in the diaphragm resection group, the lungs) occurred during procurement. After transplantation, the incidence of delayed graft function in kidney recipients was 7.32% (9/123) in the diaphragm preservation group and 11.67% (14/120) in the diaphragm resection group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.279). The incidence of DDI was 0 in the diaphragm preservation group and 7.07% (13/184) in the diaphragm resection group, showing a statistically significant difference ( P<0.001). No cases of primary non-function or perioperative death occurred in either group. Conclusion:Compared with the conventional method, the combined liver and kidney procurement technique that preserves the donor diaphragm does not significantly increase operative time, organ injury, delayed graft function, primary non-function, or perioperative mortality. It significantly reduces the incidence of donor-derived infections and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Objective:To investigate the application value of laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation.Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 9 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplanta-tion in People′s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January to April 2024 were collected. Of the donors, there were 8 males and 1 female, aged (39±18)years and with body mass index (BMI) of (20±4)kg/m 2. Of the recipients, there were 7 males and 2 females, aged (41±13)years and with BMI of (24±4)kg/m 2. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Count data were described as absolute numbers. Results:(1) Surgical conditions. Of the 9 recipients, 7 recipients underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation successfully, 1 recipient with severe portal hypertension converted to open surgery with reverse L-shaped incision due to the hemorrhage during the dissection of the first hepatic portal after completing liver mobilization under laparoscopy, and 1 recipient underwent trans-umbilical extension incision through the middle of the epigastric region due to the limited space for operation in the implantation of the donor liver. The total operation time for 7 recipients who successfully underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation was (648±31)minutes, with a time of anhepatic phase of (57±5)minutes, the volume of intraoperative blood loss of (1 322±627)mL, the donor liver mass of (1 195±232)g, and the ratio of donor liver mass to recipient body mass of 1.86%±0.42%. The operation time for laparoscopic liver dissection and porta hepatis dissection in 8 recipients during surgery was (212±35)minutes. (2) Postoperative conditions. All 9 recipients recovered smoothly after surgery, without any vascular or biliary related complications, and the surgical incision recovered well. The duration of postoperative hospital stay of 7 recipients who successfully underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation was (14.2±2.0)days. (3) Follow-up. All 9 recipients were followed up for 3 months after surgery. During the follow-up period, there was no vascular or bile duct related complication.Conclusion:Laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation can be applied to recipients who meet surgical conditions and achieve good short-term clinical efficacy.

Objective:To investigate the application value of laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation.Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 9 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplanta-tion in People′s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January to April 2024 were collected. Of the donors, there were 8 males and 1 female, aged (39±18)years and with body mass index (BMI) of (20±4)kg/m 2. Of the recipients, there were 7 males and 2 females, aged (41±13)years and with BMI of (24±4)kg/m 2. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Count data were described as absolute numbers. Results:(1) Surgical conditions. Of the 9 recipients, 7 recipients underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation successfully, 1 recipient with severe portal hypertension converted to open surgery with reverse L-shaped incision due to the hemorrhage during the dissection of the first hepatic portal after completing liver mobilization under laparoscopy, and 1 recipient underwent trans-umbilical extension incision through the middle of the epigastric region due to the limited space for operation in the implantation of the donor liver. The total operation time for 7 recipients who successfully underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation was (648±31)minutes, with a time of anhepatic phase of (57±5)minutes, the volume of intraoperative blood loss of (1 322±627)mL, the donor liver mass of (1 195±232)g, and the ratio of donor liver mass to recipient body mass of 1.86%±0.42%. The operation time for laparoscopic liver dissection and porta hepatis dissection in 8 recipients during surgery was (212±35)minutes. (2) Postoperative conditions. All 9 recipients recovered smoothly after surgery, without any vascular or biliary related complications, and the surgical incision recovered well. The duration of postoperative hospital stay of 7 recipients who successfully underwent laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation was (14.2±2.0)days. (3) Follow-up. All 9 recipients were followed up for 3 months after surgery. During the follow-up period, there was no vascular or bile duct related complication.Conclusion:Laparoscopic-assisted total liver transplantation can be applied to recipients who meet surgical conditions and achieve good short-term clinical efficacy.