1.Associations of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index with maternal gestational diabetes mellitus: Evidence from a prospective birth cohort study.
Shuanghua XIE ; Enjie ZHANG ; Shen GAO ; Shaofei SU ; Jianhui LIU ; Yue ZHANG ; Yingyi LUAN ; Kaikun HUANG ; Minhui HU ; Xueran WANG ; Hao XING ; Ruixia LIU ; Wentao YUE ; Chenghong YIN
Chinese Medical Journal 2025;138(6):729-737
BACKGROUND:
The role of inflammation in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has recently become a focus of research. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), novel indices, reflect the body's chronic immune-inflammatory state. This study aimed to investigate the associations between the SII or SIRI and GDM.
METHODS:
A prospective birth cohort study was conducted at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from February 2018 to December 2020, recruiting participants in their first trimester of pregnancy. Baseline SII and SIRI values were derived from routine clinical blood results, calculated as follows: SII = neutrophil (Neut) count × platelet (PLT) count/lymphocyte (Lymph) count, SIRI = Neut count × monocyte (Mono) count/Lymph count, with participants being grouped by quartiles of their SII or SIRI values. Participants were followed up for GDM with a 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks of gestation using the glucose thresholds of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). Logistic regression was used to analyze the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the the associations between SII, SIRI, and the risk of GDM.
RESULTS:
Among the 28,124 women included in the study, the average age was 31.8 ± 3.8 years, and 15.76% (4432/28,124) developed GDM. Higher SII and SIRI quartiles were correlated with increased GDM rates, with rates ranging from 12.26% (862/7031) in the lowest quartile to 20.10% (1413/7031) in the highest quartile for the SII ( Ptrend <0.001) and 11.92-19.31% for the SIRI ( Ptrend <0.001). The ORs (95% CIs) of the second, third, and fourth SII quartiles were 1.09 (0.98-1.21), 1.21 (1.09-1.34), and 1.39 (1.26-1.54), respectively. The SIRI findings paralleled the SII outcomes. For the second through fourth quartiles, the ORs (95% CIs) were 1.24 (1.12-1.38), 1.41 (1.27-1.57), and 1.64 (1.48-1.82), respectively. These associations were maintained in subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
The SII and SIRI are potential independent risk factors contributing to the onset of GDM.
Humans
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Diabetes, Gestational/immunology*
;
Prospective Studies
;
Adult
;
Inflammation/immunology*
;
Glucose Tolerance Test
;
Birth Cohort
3.Model Construction for Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Care Based on Multidimensional Indicators
Han BAO ; Shaofei SU ; Meina LIU
Chinese Journal of Health Statistics 2017;34(5):700-704
Objective The study aimed to construct a composite score method based on multidimensional quality indi-cators and conduct simulation trials to validate the method. Besides,the quality of breast cancer care for both hospitals and sur-geons was evaluated by the method. Methods The two-parameter logistic latent variable model was constructed as measure-ment model;the latent variables in the measurement model were further incorporated into multilevel structural model as depend-ent variables and one pseudo level was designed for representing multiple latent variables. MCMC method was used to estimate model parameters. Three level and two-dimensional latent variable model was used to analyze the actual data. Results The sim-ulation study showed that the number of quality indicators and surgeons should not be less than 20 to obtain efficient estimate of quality of care;the multilevel and multidimensional latent variable model was applied to analyze the data;surgeons and hospitals who provided superior quality of breast cancer diagnosis and operative procedure were obtained. Conclusion The newly con-structed multilevel and multidimensional latent variable model could effectively address the hieratical structure in quality of care data as well as the multidimensional nature of quality of care,thus,the model can be used to comprehensively and rationally as-sess the quality of care;comprehensive evaluation of quality of care provided ground for linking the ranking of hospitals and per-formance appraisal of surgeons to the quality of care.
4.Model Construction for Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Care Based on Multidimensional Indicators
Han BAO ; Shaofei SU ; Meina LIU
Chinese Journal of Health Statistics 2017;34(5):700-704
Objective The study aimed to construct a composite score method based on multidimensional quality indi-cators and conduct simulation trials to validate the method. Besides,the quality of breast cancer care for both hospitals and sur-geons was evaluated by the method. Methods The two-parameter logistic latent variable model was constructed as measure-ment model;the latent variables in the measurement model were further incorporated into multilevel structural model as depend-ent variables and one pseudo level was designed for representing multiple latent variables. MCMC method was used to estimate model parameters. Three level and two-dimensional latent variable model was used to analyze the actual data. Results The sim-ulation study showed that the number of quality indicators and surgeons should not be less than 20 to obtain efficient estimate of quality of care;the multilevel and multidimensional latent variable model was applied to analyze the data;surgeons and hospitals who provided superior quality of breast cancer diagnosis and operative procedure were obtained. Conclusion The newly con-structed multilevel and multidimensional latent variable model could effectively address the hieratical structure in quality of care data as well as the multidimensional nature of quality of care,thus,the model can be used to comprehensively and rationally as-sess the quality of care;comprehensive evaluation of quality of care provided ground for linking the ranking of hospitals and per-formance appraisal of surgeons to the quality of care.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail