OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and short-term effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed customized porous acetabular components for reconstruction of extensive acetabular bone defects during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: The clinical data of 8 patients with extensive acetabular bone defects, who were treated with 3D-printed individualized porous acetabular components between July 2018 and January 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. The cohort comprised 4 males and 4 females with an average age of 48 years ranging from 34 to 56 years. Acetabular bone defects were classified as Paprosky type ⅢA in 3 cases and type ⅢB in 5 cases. The causes of acetabular destruction were hip tuberculosis (5 cases), pigmented villonodular synovitis (2 cases), and syphilitic arthritis (1 case). Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris hip score (HHS) were used to evaluate the pain relief and hip function before and after operation. Reconstruction outcomes were further assessed by imaging results [X-ray film and Tomosynthesis Shimadzumetal artefact reduction technology (T-SMART)], and the mechanical properties were evaluated by finite element analysis. RESULTS: The operation time ranged from 174 to 195 minutes (mean, 187 minutes), and intraoperative blood loss ranged from 390 to 530 mL (mean, 465 mL). All 8 patients were follow-up 26-74 months (mean, 44 months). Among the 5 patients with tuberculosis, none experienced postoperative recurrence. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.3±0.5 and the HHS score was 87.9±3.7, both significantly improved compared to preoperative values ( t=25.170, P<0.001; t=-28.322, P<0.001). X-ray films at 2 years after operation demonstrated satisfactory matching between the 3D-printed customized acetabular component and the acetabulum. The postoperative center of rotation of the operated hip was shifted by (2.1±0.5) mm horizontally and (2.0±0.7) mm vertically relative to the contralateral side, with both offsets showing significant differences compared to preoperative values ( t=24.700, P<0.001; t=55.230, P<0.001). T-SMART imaging showed satisfactory osseointegration at the implant-host bone interface. No complications such as aseptic loosening or screw breakage was observed during follow-up. Finite element analysis showed that the acetabular component had good mechanical properties. CONCLUSION The application of 3D-printed individualized porous acetabular components in the reconstruction of extensive acetabular bone defects demonstrated precise anatomical reconstruction, stable mechanical support, and good functional performance in short-term follow-up, offering a potential alternative for acetabular defect reconstruction in primary THA.
Humans ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Female ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation* ; Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging* ; Adult ; Follow-Up Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Prosthesis Design ; Porosity ; Treatment Outcome ; Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods*

Objective:To explore the influencing factors of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy.Methods:From January 2019 to June 2020, convenience sampling was used to select 210 patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative chemotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University as the research object. The patients were investigated with the General Information Questionnaire and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) . Taking 70 scores as the critical value of CD-RISC, patients were divided into the good psychological resilience group (CD-RISC score≥70) and the poor psychological resilience group (CD-RISC score<70) according to their scores. Binomial Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors.Results:There were 112 patients in the good psychological resilience group and 98 patients in the poor psychological resilience group. The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in the psychological resilience of breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy with different marital status, per capita monthly income of family, course of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and family residence ( P<0.05) . The binomial Logistic regression analysis showed that marital status, per capita monthly income of family, course of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and family residence were the influencing factors of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:There are many influencing factors of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. Targeted psychological intervention should be carried out according to the influencing factors to improve the psychological resilience of patients.

Humans ; Tranexamic Acid ; Atrial Fibrillation ; Antifibrinolytic Agents ; Arthroplasty ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dezocine combined with sufentanil in burn patients after escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting.

METHODSSixty burn patients hospitalized in Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of our hospital from February 2011 to December 2013, conforming to the study criteria and going to have escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting, were divided into sufentanil group (S, n = 30) and dezocine+sufentanil group (DS, n = 30) according to the random number table. Patients in group S were given 150 mL normal saline containing 2.5 µg/kg sufentanil citrate and 6 mg tropisetron after skin grafting for 48 hours. Patients in group DS were given 150 mL normal saline containing 0.25 mg/kg dezocine, 1.5 µg/kg sufentanil citrate, and 6 mg tropisetron for 48 hours. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Bruggrmann Comfort Scale (BCS), and Ramsay Sedation Scale were used to evaluate the sedative effect or analgesic effect, and their scores were recorded at administration hour (AH) 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48. The times of efficient injection and incidence of adverse effect within the 48 AH were recorded. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTSThere were no obvious differences in the scores of VAS and BCS between two groups at each time point (with t values from -0.426 to 0.864, P values above 0.05). The scores of Ramsay Sedation Scale in group S at AH 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 were respectively (3.2 ± 0.6), (3.2 ± 0.5), (3.3 ± 0.7), (3.2 ± 0.4), and (3.3 ± 0.4) points, which were higher than those in group DS [(2.4 ± 0.6), (2.5 ± 0.5), (2.4 ± 0.6), (2.4 ± 0.4), and (2.4 ± 0.5) points, with t values from 5.302 to 8.391, P values below 0.001]. The times of efficient injection within the 48 AH was 6.8 ± 0.7 in group S and 6.5 ± 0.9 in group DS, showing no significantly statistical difference (t = 1.260, P > 0.05). Respiratory depression was not observed in both groups; the incidence of pruritus was the same, and that of urine retention was similar between the 2 groups within the 48 AH (with P values above 0.05). Within the 48 AH, the incidence of nausea and vomiting in group S was 26.7% (8/30), which was obviously higher than that in group DS (6.7%, 2/30, P < 0.05); the incidence of drowsiness in group S was 20.0% (6/30), which was significantly higher than that in group DS (no patient, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSDezocine combined with sufentanil can provide effective postoperative analgesia with little adverse effect for PCIA in burn patients after escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting, therefore it can be widely used.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid ; administration & dosage ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Burns ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Skin Transplantation ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Tetrahydronaphthalenes ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome