1.Dosimetric study of undergoing pelvic protection for patients with cervical cancer based on two kinds of rotational irradiation modes
Hao QIU ; Feifei ZHANG ; Chun BI ; Tianhong TANG ; Wenjing LI ; Shancheng SHI ; Jiajia WANG ; Qianjin SHI
China Medical Equipment 2025;22(3):22-28
Objective:To compare the dosimetric differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)and helical tomotherapy(HT)in undergoing protective plan for pelvic bones of patients with cervical cancer.Methods:A total of 40 patients with cervical cancer,who underwent radiotherapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University from January 2023 to February 2024,were selected for this study.The target volumes and organs at risk(OARs)were delineated after the information of computed tomography(CT)simulation images were acquired from each patient.The pelvic bone was alone delineated as OAR.Two kinds of bone marrow dose-limiting radiotherapy plans,coplanar dual-arc VMAT and HT,were respectively designed for each patient by using the treatment planning system(TPS)of radiotherapy.A statistical analysis was conducted to compare the dose parameters of target volume,conformity,homogeneity,OAR dose-volume,mean dose,and maximum dose of point between the two kinds of plans.Results:Both the VMAT and HT plans could meet the requirements of target volume and OARs for dose.For general OARs,the dose-volume percentage(V40 Gy)of V40 Gy at bladder,mean dose(Dmean),rectal V40 Gy,maximum dose(Dmax)at small intestine point of HT plan were respectively(38.97±2.29)%,(38.06±0.45)Gy,(61.50±2.51)%and(50.82±0.36)Gy.The differences of them between HT plan and VMAT plan were statistically significant(t=25.46,13.99,1.56,10.93,P<0.05).The V10 Gy,V20 Gy,V30 Gy and Dmean of VMAT plan were respectively(70.76±2.51)%,(60.84±3.29)%,(52.40±2.56)%and(32.02±4.33)Gy for pelvic bones,which were significantly lower than those of HT plan,and the differences of them between two kinds of plans were also statistically significant(t=-20.68,-13.23,-7.73,-10.26,P<0.05).Conclusion:The HT plan can provide the optimal dose distribution for target region in radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer,which can better protect OAR nearby target region.VMAT plan has a significant advantage in low-dose regions of protecting pelvis.Thus,individualized treatment design should be conducted according to the conditions of each patient in clinical treatment.
2.Dosimetric study of undergoing pelvic protection for patients with cervical cancer based on two kinds of rotational irradiation modes
Hao QIU ; Feifei ZHANG ; Chun BI ; Tianhong TANG ; Wenjing LI ; Shancheng SHI ; Jiajia WANG ; Qianjin SHI
China Medical Equipment 2025;22(3):22-28
Objective:To compare the dosimetric differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)and helical tomotherapy(HT)in undergoing protective plan for pelvic bones of patients with cervical cancer.Methods:A total of 40 patients with cervical cancer,who underwent radiotherapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University from January 2023 to February 2024,were selected for this study.The target volumes and organs at risk(OARs)were delineated after the information of computed tomography(CT)simulation images were acquired from each patient.The pelvic bone was alone delineated as OAR.Two kinds of bone marrow dose-limiting radiotherapy plans,coplanar dual-arc VMAT and HT,were respectively designed for each patient by using the treatment planning system(TPS)of radiotherapy.A statistical analysis was conducted to compare the dose parameters of target volume,conformity,homogeneity,OAR dose-volume,mean dose,and maximum dose of point between the two kinds of plans.Results:Both the VMAT and HT plans could meet the requirements of target volume and OARs for dose.For general OARs,the dose-volume percentage(V40 Gy)of V40 Gy at bladder,mean dose(Dmean),rectal V40 Gy,maximum dose(Dmax)at small intestine point of HT plan were respectively(38.97±2.29)%,(38.06±0.45)Gy,(61.50±2.51)%and(50.82±0.36)Gy.The differences of them between HT plan and VMAT plan were statistically significant(t=25.46,13.99,1.56,10.93,P<0.05).The V10 Gy,V20 Gy,V30 Gy and Dmean of VMAT plan were respectively(70.76±2.51)%,(60.84±3.29)%,(52.40±2.56)%and(32.02±4.33)Gy for pelvic bones,which were significantly lower than those of HT plan,and the differences of them between two kinds of plans were also statistically significant(t=-20.68,-13.23,-7.73,-10.26,P<0.05).Conclusion:The HT plan can provide the optimal dose distribution for target region in radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer,which can better protect OAR nearby target region.VMAT plan has a significant advantage in low-dose regions of protecting pelvis.Thus,individualized treatment design should be conducted according to the conditions of each patient in clinical treatment.
3.Application of the " three streams in one" integrated management based on dual code carriers in the whole lifecycle management of medical consumables
Qin ZHANG ; Hui ZHONG ; Xiaokun GAO ; Jian ZHANG ; Shancheng YU ; Feng SHI ; Wenjun GE ; Yue ZHUANG
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration 2024;40(7):554-557
In order to improve the level of refined management of medical consumables, a hospital used radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to map the unique device identification barcode of medical devices to the supply-processing-distribution (SPD) code, generating a medical consumables RFID tag code with dual code carrier function and a unique serial number. The " three streams in one" mutual integration management mode of hospital information flow, material flow and financial flow was constructed, which realized the whole lifecycle traceability of medical consumables, effectively improved the intelligence and accuracy of inventory control, further optimized the integration function of medical consumables industry and finance, and provided strong data support for the decision-making analysis of hospital operation and management.
4.Neoadjuvant radiohormonal therapy for oligo-metastatic prostate cancer: safety and efficacy outcomes from an open-label, dose-escalation, single-center, phase I/II clinical trial.
Yifan CHANG ; Xianzhi ZHAO ; Yutian XIAO ; Shi YAN ; Weidong XU ; Ye WANG ; Huojun ZHANG ; Shancheng REN
Frontiers of Medicine 2023;17(2):231-239
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant radiohormonal therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC), we conducted a 3 + 3 dose escalation, prospective, phase I/II, single-arm clinical trial (CHiCTR1900025743), in which long-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation was adopted 1 month before radiotherapy, comprising intensity modulated radiotherapy to the pelvis, and stereotactic body radiation therapy to all extra-pelvic bone metastases for 4-7 weeks, at 39.6, 45, 50.4, and 54 Gy. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy was performed after 5-14 weeks. The primary outcome was treatment-related toxicities and adverse events; secondary outcomes were radiological treatment response, positive surgical margin (pSM), postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathological down-grading and tumor regression grade, and survival parameters. Twelve patients were recruited from March 2019 to February 2020, aging 66.2 years in average (range, 52-80). Median baseline PSA was 62.0 ng/mL. All underwent RARP successfully without open conversions. Ten patients recorded pathological tumor down-staging (83.3%), and 5 (41.7%) with cN1 recorded negative regional lymph nodes on final pathology. 66.7% (8/12) recorded tumor regression grading (TRG) -I and 25% (3/12) recorded TRG-II. Median follow-up was 16.5 months. Mean radiological progression-free survival (RPFS) was 21.3 months, with 2-year RPFS of 83.3%. In all, neoadjuvant radiohormonal therapy is well tolerated for oligometastatic prostate cancer.
Male
;
Humans
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy*
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen/therapeutic use*
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy
;
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use*
;
Prospective Studies
5.Progress of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk prostate cancer in the era of novel hormonal therapy
Shi YAN ; Yasheng ZHU ; Yutian XIAO ; Tao GUO ; Ye WANG ; Xiaomin ZHANG ; Shancheng REN
Journal of Modern Urology 2023;28(12):1092-1096
In the past, the use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer did not exhibit survival benefits and was not recommended by the practicing guidelines. In recent years, with the emergence of novel hormonal therapeutics such as Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, Apalutamide and Darolutamide, the interest for neoadjuvant therapy has been reignited. Here, we summarize the four categories of neoadjuvant therapy with new hormonal agents, and discuss how to evaluate the efficacy and explore the molecular mechanism after neoadjuvant therapy.
6.Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through different approaches: initial experience and outcomes
Wei DU ; Weidong XU ; Yue YANG ; Yifan CHANG ; Xiaojun LU ; Yutian XIAO ; Xiaomin ZHANG ; Shi YAN ; Ye WANG ; Zhiyong LIU ; Shancheng REN
Chinese Journal of Urology 2020;41(11):815-819
Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of sing-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(sp-RALP) through different approaches.Methods:The data of 115 patients who underwent sp-RALP through different approaches from May 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. In our study, 92 cases through extraperitoneal approach, 10 through transperineal approach and 13 though transvesical approach. Preoperative, intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes after various approaches were collected and analyzed. The mean age was 67(52-84) years, mean preoperative body mass index was 24.44(19.52-32.33) kg/m 2. Patients were graded as cT 1-3aN 0M 0 with no signs of regional lymph node invasion or distal metastasis. The median preoperative PSA was 9.77(6.54, 15.32) ng/ml. Results:All 115 sp-RALP were successfully completed with no conversion to open surgery or additional ports being placed. The mean operative time was 91.8(40-200)min, with 88.0(40-200)min for extraperitoneal approach, 132.5 (90-190)min for transperineal approach and 87.3(60-150)min for transvesical approach. The mean estimated blood loss was 85.5 (45-400)ml, with 77.6(50-200)ml for extraperitoneal approach, 178.0(80-400)ml for transperineal approach and 70.4 (45-150)ml for transvesical approach. Of the 115 patients, 60.9% (70/115)were

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail