This study is a convergence study that empirically verifies the principles of the Hunminjeongeum Joongsung-Ja (中聲字, vowel) system, especially the principles of the pictorial patterns of the initial and re-involved characters, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). According to the principle stated in the Jejahae (制字解) of the Hunminjeongeum Haeryebon—that “the 28 characters of Jeongeum were each modeled after their shapes”—this study aimed to prove that all characters were devised to reflect the shape of the vocal tract when pronounced. Four participants, including both younger and older adults including both sexes were enrolled in this study, and real-time MRI scans and acoustic analysis were conducted. In the analysis of the Cho-Chul-Ja (初出字, /ㅗ, ㅏ, ㅜ, ㅓ/), clear differences were observed in the structure of the vocal tract and the shape of the resonance cavity according to the vowels, and the degree of lip opening and the length of the vocal tract showed a close relationship with the acoustic characteristics of each vowel. In the Jae-Chul-Ja (再出字, /ㅛ, ㅑ, ㅠ, ㅕ/), changes in the shape of the resonance cavity were observed along with changes in tongue movement and lip opening during diphthong utterances, and it was confirmed that this is directly related to acoustic characteristics. The results of this study confirmed that the principle of the Hunminjeongeum Joongsung-Ja (中聲字, vowel) is closely related to the form of resonance cavity in the actual articulation process. It was confirmed that it was created by the synthesis (Hapsung, 合成) of the three letters “Cheon-ji-in (天地人, /•, ㅡ, ㅣ/)”, and it was also confirmed that the pictorial principles of the first and second versions are based on the shape and movement of the resonance tube. It is significant in that it re-examines the scientific sophistication of the vowel system devised during the creation of Hunminjeongeum in the 15th century with modern technology. This shows that Hunminjeongeum is not just a philosophical symbol, but a writing system that reflects the anatomical structure and physiological movements of actual speech organs.

Objective: To establish the lower limits of normative values of the physical work capacity for Korean farmers in healthy working individual. Methods: We developed a comprehensive set of physical work capacity evaluation items that encompass common farming tasks. These items include measurements of trunk flexion/extension angles, strength (hand grip, trunk flexion/extension, leg/back lifting, and pushing/pulling), and positional tolerances. We calculated the normative values for the items and defined the normal range in 124 healthy volunteers aged 20–79 years. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to validate the test-retest reliability of the measurements protocol. Results: The normal values for each measurement item were as follows: trunk flexion and extension angle (65.3°±11.6° and 29.6°±6.6°), dominant hand grip strength (32.2±10.5 kgf), trunk flexion and extension strength (288.4±119.0 N and 297.3±129.9 N), leg and back lifting strength (452.9±233.5 N and 349.2±166.7 N), pushing and pulling strength (214.7±75.1 N and 221.7±63.3 N), and positional tolerance time (squat: 76.8±9.0 seconds, front: 73.8±7.7 seconds, twist: 82.2±8.8 seconds, upward: 71.9±11.3 seconds). Regarding test-retest reliability, all strength measurements demonstrated excellent absolute agreement (ICC, 0.91–0.96). However, positional tolerance showed poor-to-moderate absolute agreement (ICC, 0.37–0.58). Conclusion We conducted measurements of muscle strength and positional tolerance in healthy participants of various ages, focusing on tasks commonly performed by Korean farmers. The outcomes hold significant value as they offer a pertinent instrument for assessing the appropriateness of workers, thereby carrying implications for rehabilitation objectives, legal evaluations, and work capacity assessments within the agricultural domain.

Objective: To translate and culturally adapt the Information Needs in Cardiac Rehabilitation (INCR) questionnaire into Korean and perform psychometric validation. Methods: The original English version of the INCR, in which patients are asked to rate the importance of 55 topics, was translated into Korean (INCR-K) and culturally adapted. The INCR-K was tested on 101 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participants at Kangwon National University Hospital and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital in Korea. Structural validity was assessed using principal component analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha of the areas was computed. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing information needs according to CR duration and knowledge sufficiency according to receipt of education. Half of the participants were randomly selected for 1 month of re-testing to assess their responsiveness. Results: Following cognitive debriefing, the number of items was reduced to 41 and ratings were added to assess participants’ sufficient knowledge of each item. The INCR-K structure comprised eight areas, each with sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha>0.7). Criterion validity was supported by significant differences in mean INCR-K scores based on CR duration and knowledge sufficiency ratings according to receipt of education (p<0.05). Information needs and knowledge sufficiency ratings increased after 1 month of CR, thus supporting responsiveness (p<0.05). Conclusion The INCR-K demonstrated adequate face, content, cross-cultural, structural, and criterion validities, internal consistency, and responsiveness. Information needs changed with CR, such that multiple assessments of information needs may be warranted as rehabilitation progresses to facilitate patient-centered education.