Objective: A humanities-based approach to understanding the brain can yield valuable insights, advancing neuroscience and enhancing mental, emotional, and social well-being. This study was aimed at exploring how engagement in literature-related activities stimulates brain activity in the prefrontal cortex. Methods: We recruited 24 healthy male participants aged 20 to 29 years. They completed clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, attention, and humanistic knowledge. They also performed six tasks comprising various literature-related cognitive challenges while hemodynamic changes in their frontal cortices were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Task 1 (word memory and recognition) increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as did Task 2 (emotional words classification), which also elevated activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Task 3 (understanding context) increased activation in the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). Tasks 4 (interpersonal relationship) and 5 (listening, memory, understanding, and expression) drove similar increases in the frontopolar and DLPFC regions. Task 6 (creative activities using characters and items) significantly activated multiple regions, including the right and left VLPFC and OFC. Humanistic knowledge scores were positively correlated with left and right DLPFC activation in Tasks 3 and 5, respectively. Conversely, Task 6 showed negative correlations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and both right DLPFC and right OFC activation. Conclusion This study identified key brain regions involved in literature activities. Complex activities (semantic processing, understanding and creative expression, decision-making and emotional regulation, etc.) stimulated various regions of prefrontal cortices, including the VLPFC, DLPFC, and OFC.

Objective: A humanities-based approach to understanding the brain can yield valuable insights, advancing neuroscience and enhancing mental, emotional, and social well-being. This study was aimed at exploring how engagement in literature-related activities stimulates brain activity in the prefrontal cortex. Methods: We recruited 24 healthy male participants aged 20 to 29 years. They completed clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, attention, and humanistic knowledge. They also performed six tasks comprising various literature-related cognitive challenges while hemodynamic changes in their frontal cortices were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Task 1 (word memory and recognition) increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as did Task 2 (emotional words classification), which also elevated activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Task 3 (understanding context) increased activation in the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). Tasks 4 (interpersonal relationship) and 5 (listening, memory, understanding, and expression) drove similar increases in the frontopolar and DLPFC regions. Task 6 (creative activities using characters and items) significantly activated multiple regions, including the right and left VLPFC and OFC. Humanistic knowledge scores were positively correlated with left and right DLPFC activation in Tasks 3 and 5, respectively. Conversely, Task 6 showed negative correlations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and both right DLPFC and right OFC activation. Conclusion This study identified key brain regions involved in literature activities. Complex activities (semantic processing, understanding and creative expression, decision-making and emotional regulation, etc.) stimulated various regions of prefrontal cortices, including the VLPFC, DLPFC, and OFC.

Objective: A humanities-based approach to understanding the brain can yield valuable insights, advancing neuroscience and enhancing mental, emotional, and social well-being. This study was aimed at exploring how engagement in literature-related activities stimulates brain activity in the prefrontal cortex. Methods: We recruited 24 healthy male participants aged 20 to 29 years. They completed clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, attention, and humanistic knowledge. They also performed six tasks comprising various literature-related cognitive challenges while hemodynamic changes in their frontal cortices were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Task 1 (word memory and recognition) increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as did Task 2 (emotional words classification), which also elevated activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Task 3 (understanding context) increased activation in the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). Tasks 4 (interpersonal relationship) and 5 (listening, memory, understanding, and expression) drove similar increases in the frontopolar and DLPFC regions. Task 6 (creative activities using characters and items) significantly activated multiple regions, including the right and left VLPFC and OFC. Humanistic knowledge scores were positively correlated with left and right DLPFC activation in Tasks 3 and 5, respectively. Conversely, Task 6 showed negative correlations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and both right DLPFC and right OFC activation. Conclusion This study identified key brain regions involved in literature activities. Complex activities (semantic processing, understanding and creative expression, decision-making and emotional regulation, etc.) stimulated various regions of prefrontal cortices, including the VLPFC, DLPFC, and OFC.

Objective: A humanities-based approach to understanding the brain can yield valuable insights, advancing neuroscience and enhancing mental, emotional, and social well-being. This study was aimed at exploring how engagement in literature-related activities stimulates brain activity in the prefrontal cortex. Methods: We recruited 24 healthy male participants aged 20 to 29 years. They completed clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, attention, and humanistic knowledge. They also performed six tasks comprising various literature-related cognitive challenges while hemodynamic changes in their frontal cortices were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Task 1 (word memory and recognition) increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as did Task 2 (emotional words classification), which also elevated activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Task 3 (understanding context) increased activation in the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). Tasks 4 (interpersonal relationship) and 5 (listening, memory, understanding, and expression) drove similar increases in the frontopolar and DLPFC regions. Task 6 (creative activities using characters and items) significantly activated multiple regions, including the right and left VLPFC and OFC. Humanistic knowledge scores were positively correlated with left and right DLPFC activation in Tasks 3 and 5, respectively. Conversely, Task 6 showed negative correlations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and both right DLPFC and right OFC activation. Conclusion This study identified key brain regions involved in literature activities. Complex activities (semantic processing, understanding and creative expression, decision-making and emotional regulation, etc.) stimulated various regions of prefrontal cortices, including the VLPFC, DLPFC, and OFC.

Objective: A humanities-based approach to understanding the brain can yield valuable insights, advancing neuroscience and enhancing mental, emotional, and social well-being. This study was aimed at exploring how engagement in literature-related activities stimulates brain activity in the prefrontal cortex. Methods: We recruited 24 healthy male participants aged 20 to 29 years. They completed clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, attention, and humanistic knowledge. They also performed six tasks comprising various literature-related cognitive challenges while hemodynamic changes in their frontal cortices were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Task 1 (word memory and recognition) increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as did Task 2 (emotional words classification), which also elevated activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Task 3 (understanding context) increased activation in the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). Tasks 4 (interpersonal relationship) and 5 (listening, memory, understanding, and expression) drove similar increases in the frontopolar and DLPFC regions. Task 6 (creative activities using characters and items) significantly activated multiple regions, including the right and left VLPFC and OFC. Humanistic knowledge scores were positively correlated with left and right DLPFC activation in Tasks 3 and 5, respectively. Conversely, Task 6 showed negative correlations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and both right DLPFC and right OFC activation. Conclusion This study identified key brain regions involved in literature activities. Complex activities (semantic processing, understanding and creative expression, decision-making and emotional regulation, etc.) stimulated various regions of prefrontal cortices, including the VLPFC, DLPFC, and OFC.

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health concern in Korea.Identifying spatiotemporal patterns of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and survival outcomes is crucial for effective resource allocation and targeted interventions. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the spatiotemporal epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea, with a focus on identifying high-risk areas and populations and examining factors associated with prehospital outcomes. Methods: We conducted this population-based observational study using data from the Korean out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry from January 2009 to December 2021. Using a Bayesian spatiotemporal model based on the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation, we calculated the standardized incidence ratio and assessed the relative risk to compare the spatial and temporal distributions over time. The primary outcome was out-ofhospital cardiac arrest incidence, and the secondary outcomes included prehospital return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital admission and discharge, and good neurological outcomes. Results: Although the number of cases increased over time, the spatiotemporal analysis exhibited a discernible temporal pattern in the standardized incidence ratio of out-ofhospital cardiac arrest with a gradual decline over time (1.07; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.04–1.09 in 2009 vs. 1.00; 95% CrI, 0.98–1.03 in 2021). The district-specific risk ratios of survival outcomes were more favorable in the metropolitan and major metropolitan areas.In particular, the neurological outcomes were significantly improved from relative risk 0.35 (0.31–0.39) in 2009 to 1.75 (1.65–1.86) in 2021. Conclusion This study emphasized the significance of small-area analyses in identifying high-risk regions and populations using spatiotemporal analyses. These findings have implications for public health planning efforts to alleviate the burden of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea.