Human chemically derived hepatic progenitors (hCdHs) reprogrammed using three chemicals—HGF, A83-01, and CHIR99021 (collectively denoted as “HAC”)—have been suggested as a novel therapeutic for patients with severe liver diseases in our previous study. Despite its high proliferation and re-differentiation ability into functional hepatocytes, the reprogramming mechanism of hCdHs remained unknown. Recently, it has been reported that autophagy, a self-degradation process, is responsible for stem cell metabolism. In this study, we investigated whether autophagy regulates the generation mechanism of CdHs, mainly using hepatocytes from C57BL/6 mice, with additional analysis using human hepatocytes. As a result, we found that autophagy flux is inhibited during the generation of mouse CdHs (mCdHs) by A83-01, which is compensated by CHIR99021. Moreover, the suppression of autophagy by bafilomycin A1 enhanced the proliferation ability of mCdHs during the generation process. hCdHs also showed a similar autophagy inhibition pattern to mCdHs during the generation process. Taken together, our study indicates that autophagy is downregulated during the generation of CdHs, promoting their proliferation. This may contribute to the production of hCdHs with stable productivity, which may serve as a therapeutic for severe liver diseases.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose Episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) is characterized by recurrent vertigo and ataxia due to mutations in CACNA1A that encodes the α 1A-subunit of the P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channel. This study aimed to determine intellectual function in EA2. Methods: During 2019–2023, 13 patients (6 males, age range=10–52 years, median age=29 years) with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of EA2 had their intellectual function evaluated using the Korean versions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales (version IV) for adults or children in 3 referral-based university hospitals in South Korea. Results: The full-scale intelligence quotients (FSIQs) among the 13 patients were below the average (90–109) in 11, low average (80–89) in 5 (38.5%), borderline (70–79) in 1 (7.7%), and indicated intellectual disability (≤69) in 5 (38.5%). These patterns of cognitive impairments were observed in all four of the following subtests: verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. The FSIQ was not correlated with the ages at onset for vertigo and ataxia (Pearson correlation: p=0.40). Conclusions Patients with EA2 may have hidden intellectual disabilities even without a history of epilepsy or administration of antiepileptic drugs, and should be considered for genetic counseling and therapeutic interventions. Given the availability of medication to control episodic vertigo and ataxia, early diagnosis and management are important in preventing irreversible brain dysfunction in EA2.

Background: and Purpose Episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) is characterized by recurrent vertigo and ataxia due to mutations in CACNA1A that encodes the α 1A-subunit of the P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channel. This study aimed to determine intellectual function in EA2. Methods: During 2019–2023, 13 patients (6 males, age range=10–52 years, median age=29 years) with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of EA2 had their intellectual function evaluated using the Korean versions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales (version IV) for adults or children in 3 referral-based university hospitals in South Korea. Results: The full-scale intelligence quotients (FSIQs) among the 13 patients were below the average (90–109) in 11, low average (80–89) in 5 (38.5%), borderline (70–79) in 1 (7.7%), and indicated intellectual disability (≤69) in 5 (38.5%). These patterns of cognitive impairments were observed in all four of the following subtests: verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. The FSIQ was not correlated with the ages at onset for vertigo and ataxia (Pearson correlation: p=0.40). Conclusions Patients with EA2 may have hidden intellectual disabilities even without a history of epilepsy or administration of antiepileptic drugs, and should be considered for genetic counseling and therapeutic interventions. Given the availability of medication to control episodic vertigo and ataxia, early diagnosis and management are important in preventing irreversible brain dysfunction in EA2.

Background: and Purpose Episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) is characterized by recurrent vertigo and ataxia due to mutations in CACNA1A that encodes the α 1A-subunit of the P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channel. This study aimed to determine intellectual function in EA2. Methods: During 2019–2023, 13 patients (6 males, age range=10–52 years, median age=29 years) with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of EA2 had their intellectual function evaluated using the Korean versions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales (version IV) for adults or children in 3 referral-based university hospitals in South Korea. Results: The full-scale intelligence quotients (FSIQs) among the 13 patients were below the average (90–109) in 11, low average (80–89) in 5 (38.5%), borderline (70–79) in 1 (7.7%), and indicated intellectual disability (≤69) in 5 (38.5%). These patterns of cognitive impairments were observed in all four of the following subtests: verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. The FSIQ was not correlated with the ages at onset for vertigo and ataxia (Pearson correlation: p=0.40). Conclusions Patients with EA2 may have hidden intellectual disabilities even without a history of epilepsy or administration of antiepileptic drugs, and should be considered for genetic counseling and therapeutic interventions. Given the availability of medication to control episodic vertigo and ataxia, early diagnosis and management are important in preventing irreversible brain dysfunction in EA2.

Background: and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18 F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions 18 F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

Background: Despite their effectiveness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been associated with adverse effects, underscoring the importance of continuous surveillance to ensure vaccine safety and effective management of public health. Herein, the characteristics and risk factors of vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) were identified to gain an in-depth understanding of vaccine safety by investigating the impact of the vaccination dose on changes in post-vaccination AEs. Methods: Herein, a linked database of COVID-19 vaccination records from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, AE reports from the COVID-19 Vaccination Management System, and healthcare claims from the National Health Insurance Service, targeting ≥ 5-year-old individuals, was utilized (study duration = February 26, 2021, to January 31, 2023).The frequency and severity of reported post-vaccination AEs were evaluated. Furthermore, we specifically explored AEs in relation to the cumulative dosage of vaccines administered while evaluating associated risk factors. Results: During the observation period, 42,804,523 individuals completed the COVID-19 vaccination series, with 365,900 reporting AEs, with headache, muscle pain, and fever being the most frequently reported. Notably, the AE reports were approximately twice as high for women than for men, which was further exacerbated following both doses. Analysis by age group revealed that AE reports were lower among children, adolescents, and older adults than in the middleaged cohort (age = 50–64 years), with higher reports observed for 18–49-year-old individuals.Additionally, a higher risk of reporting was identified among individuals with lower socioeconomic status compared with those of middle socioeconomic status. Excluding dementia, the risk of reporting AEs was high in individuals with underlying diseases compared with those without, for instance, the risk of reporting AEs following two-dose vaccinations was approximately twice as high in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Conclusion These findings indicate that women, younger people, those with a lower socioeconomic status, and those with underlying health conditions reported a higher incidence of AEs following COVID-19 vaccinations. This emphasizes the need for continued monitoring to ensure safe vaccination and address vaccine-related anxiety and fear, especially within the aforementioned groups.