Background: Obesity is a well-known risk factor for chronic kidney disease and its progression. However, the impact of obesity on the renal function of the elderly population is uncertain. We investigated the association between obesity and renal outcomes in the elderly. Methods: We analyzed 130,504 participants from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort. Obesity was classified according to body mass index (BMI), sex-specific waist circumference (WC), and the presence of metabolic syndrome. The primary outcome was renal function decline, defined as a decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 50% from baseline or new-onset end-stage renal disease. Results: During a follow-up period of 559,531.1 person-years (median, 4.3 years), 2,486 participants (19.0%; incidence rate of 4.44 per 1,000 person-years) showed renal function decline. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that BMI/WC was not associated with renal function decline. However, the group with metabolic syndrome had a significantly increased risk of renal function decline compared to the group without metabolic syndrome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.36). Compared with the non-metabolic syndrome group, the adjusted HRs (95% CI) for participants with one through five components were 0.96 (0.84–1.11), 1.10 (0.96–1.27), 1.24 (1.06–1.45), 1.37 (1.12–1.66), and 1.99 (1.42–2.79), respectively (p for trend < 0.001). Conclusion In elderly Korean adults, metabolic syndrome and the number of its components were associated with a higher risk of renal function decline, but BMI or WC was not significant.

Background and Objectives: Clinical characteristics and outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF) vary by phenotype. We assessed phenotype-specific features, treatment patterns, and outcomes in a nationwide Korean cohort. Methods: The Korean Heart Failure III registry prospectively enrolled 7,351 AHF admissions at 47 hospitals. Among 6,777 patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), phenotypes were defined as heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF, ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF,41–49%), or preserved EF (HFpEF, ≥50%). The primary endpoint was a 12-month composite of all-cause death or heart transplantation, evaluated from index admission and, among hospital survivors, from discharge. We used inverse probability weighting (multinomial generalized boosted models with stabilized, trimmed weights) and weighted Cox proportional-hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Phenotype distribution was 58.9% HFrEF, 13.6% HFmrEF, and 27.5% HFpEF. Crude 12-month composite rates from index admission were 13.4% (HFrEF), 12.7% (HFmrEF), and 16.8% (HFpEF). After weighting, from index admission, HFmrEF (HR, 0.892; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.731–1.088) and HFpEF (HR, 1.101; 95% CI, 0.939–1.291) did not differ from HFrEF; from discharge, HFpEF had modestly higher risk (HR, 1.207; 95% CI, 1.008–1.445) whereas HFmrEF did not (HR, 1.039; 95% CI, 0.844–1.279). Hyponatremia and chronic kidney disease were consistent adverse markers, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/ angiotensin II receptor blocker use at discharge was protective. Conclusions Across the EF spectrum, phenotypes showed distinct profiles and risk. Postdischarge risk was modestly higher in HFpEF, supporting phenotype-tailored care and systematic discharge optimization in Korean patients with AHF.

In patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), initial recurrence risk stratification based on clinical, histopathological, and perioperative data remains the key determinant for guiding management strategies during the first 1-2 years post-treatment. However, the adoption of ongoing risk stratification (ORS), which dynamically reassesses risk by integrating longitudinal clinical data and treatment response, enables more precise long-term prognostic assessment and facilitates highly individualized management. Building upon recent guidelines, the 2026 KTA guideline has been further refined by incorporating robust evidence from large-scale national cohorts and comprehensive systematic reviews. These updated recommendations outline contemporary concepts of ORS, risk-adapted TSH suppression targets, optimized surveillance modalities for recurrence detection, and disease-specific long-term follow-up strategies. Reflecting the paradigm shift toward de-escalated treatment, this revision integrates evolved perspectives on TSH suppression intensity, the clinical interpretation of thyroglobulin levels, and tailored follow-up intervals. These evidence-based recommendations aim to minimize unnecessary treatment and excessive surveillance in the large proportion of patients with excellent prognosis after initial therapy, while ensuring that each patient receives appropriately tailored and effective long-term management.

Background and Objectives: The sense of taste has a crucial role in maintaining good health, and this is why taste disturbance can negatively impact one’s quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiologies, clinical characteristics, and effects of treatment in patients with taste disturbances.Subjects and Method A total of 160 patients with taste disorders, who visited our Smell and Taste Clinic from January 2021 to December 2022, were enrolled. All patients underwent chemical and electrical taste threshold tests, olfactory function tests, questionnaires including medical and dental history, and blood tests. The etiologies and clinical features of taste disorders were assessed and treatment was directed toward causative abnormalities. Factors affecting the improvement rates after treatment were evaluated. Results: Taste disorder due to olfactory disorder was the most frequent etiology, followed by laryngopharyngeal reflux, head trauma, and drug-induced. In many cases, there was a discrepancy in the severity of taste between the complaints reported by patients and the results of taste threshold tests. After treatment, 115 patients showed improvement in their taste function, and the improvement rates were significantly correlated with the age and etiologies of the taste disorders. Conclusion Careful history taking and accurate chemosensory testing were essential to establish the etiologies, nature, degree, and veracity of a patient’s complaint of taste disturbance. Appropriate treatments according to the etiologies allowed recovery of taste function in 71.9% of patients.

Background and Objectives: The sense of taste has a crucial role in maintaining good health, and this is why taste disturbance can negatively impact one’s quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiologies, clinical characteristics, and effects of treatment in patients with taste disturbances.Subjects and Method A total of 160 patients with taste disorders, who visited our Smell and Taste Clinic from January 2021 to December 2022, were enrolled. All patients underwent chemical and electrical taste threshold tests, olfactory function tests, questionnaires including medical and dental history, and blood tests. The etiologies and clinical features of taste disorders were assessed and treatment was directed toward causative abnormalities. Factors affecting the improvement rates after treatment were evaluated. Results: Taste disorder due to olfactory disorder was the most frequent etiology, followed by laryngopharyngeal reflux, head trauma, and drug-induced. In many cases, there was a discrepancy in the severity of taste between the complaints reported by patients and the results of taste threshold tests. After treatment, 115 patients showed improvement in their taste function, and the improvement rates were significantly correlated with the age and etiologies of the taste disorders. Conclusion Careful history taking and accurate chemosensory testing were essential to establish the etiologies, nature, degree, and veracity of a patient’s complaint of taste disturbance. Appropriate treatments according to the etiologies allowed recovery of taste function in 71.9% of patients.

Background and Objectives: The sense of taste has a crucial role in maintaining good health, and this is why taste disturbance can negatively impact one’s quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiologies, clinical characteristics, and effects of treatment in patients with taste disturbances.Subjects and Method A total of 160 patients with taste disorders, who visited our Smell and Taste Clinic from January 2021 to December 2022, were enrolled. All patients underwent chemical and electrical taste threshold tests, olfactory function tests, questionnaires including medical and dental history, and blood tests. The etiologies and clinical features of taste disorders were assessed and treatment was directed toward causative abnormalities. Factors affecting the improvement rates after treatment were evaluated. Results: Taste disorder due to olfactory disorder was the most frequent etiology, followed by laryngopharyngeal reflux, head trauma, and drug-induced. In many cases, there was a discrepancy in the severity of taste between the complaints reported by patients and the results of taste threshold tests. After treatment, 115 patients showed improvement in their taste function, and the improvement rates were significantly correlated with the age and etiologies of the taste disorders. Conclusion Careful history taking and accurate chemosensory testing were essential to establish the etiologies, nature, degree, and veracity of a patient’s complaint of taste disturbance. Appropriate treatments according to the etiologies allowed recovery of taste function in 71.9% of patients.

Background and Objectives: The sense of taste has a crucial role in maintaining good health, and this is why taste disturbance can negatively impact one’s quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiologies, clinical characteristics, and effects of treatment in patients with taste disturbances.Subjects and Method A total of 160 patients with taste disorders, who visited our Smell and Taste Clinic from January 2021 to December 2022, were enrolled. All patients underwent chemical and electrical taste threshold tests, olfactory function tests, questionnaires including medical and dental history, and blood tests. The etiologies and clinical features of taste disorders were assessed and treatment was directed toward causative abnormalities. Factors affecting the improvement rates after treatment were evaluated. Results: Taste disorder due to olfactory disorder was the most frequent etiology, followed by laryngopharyngeal reflux, head trauma, and drug-induced. In many cases, there was a discrepancy in the severity of taste between the complaints reported by patients and the results of taste threshold tests. After treatment, 115 patients showed improvement in their taste function, and the improvement rates were significantly correlated with the age and etiologies of the taste disorders. Conclusion Careful history taking and accurate chemosensory testing were essential to establish the etiologies, nature, degree, and veracity of a patient’s complaint of taste disturbance. Appropriate treatments according to the etiologies allowed recovery of taste function in 71.9% of patients.

Background and Objectives: The sense of taste has a crucial role in maintaining good health, and this is why taste disturbance can negatively impact one’s quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiologies, clinical characteristics, and effects of treatment in patients with taste disturbances.Subjects and Method A total of 160 patients with taste disorders, who visited our Smell and Taste Clinic from January 2021 to December 2022, were enrolled. All patients underwent chemical and electrical taste threshold tests, olfactory function tests, questionnaires including medical and dental history, and blood tests. The etiologies and clinical features of taste disorders were assessed and treatment was directed toward causative abnormalities. Factors affecting the improvement rates after treatment were evaluated. Results: Taste disorder due to olfactory disorder was the most frequent etiology, followed by laryngopharyngeal reflux, head trauma, and drug-induced. In many cases, there was a discrepancy in the severity of taste between the complaints reported by patients and the results of taste threshold tests. After treatment, 115 patients showed improvement in their taste function, and the improvement rates were significantly correlated with the age and etiologies of the taste disorders. Conclusion Careful history taking and accurate chemosensory testing were essential to establish the etiologies, nature, degree, and veracity of a patient’s complaint of taste disturbance. Appropriate treatments according to the etiologies allowed recovery of taste function in 71.9% of patients.

Early mortality following hemodialysis initiation hinders survival improvement in older patients. This study aimed to develop a clinical risk model for predicting 6-month mortality after dialysis initiation in older Korean hemodialysis patients. Methods: We analyzed data from incident hemodialysis patients aged >70 years from the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology (KSGN) database. A prediction model was developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis and externally validated with independent datasets. Results: Among 1,751 incident hemodialysis patients, the 6-month mortality rate was 15.5%. Using multivariate logistic analysis, we constructed the KSGN score as an independent risk factor for 6-month mortality, and its components and score are as follows: old age at dialysis initiation (≥85 years, score 2); hypertension and renovascular disease as a primary etiology of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (score 1); malignancy history (yes, score 1); low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dL, score 1); hypertension treatment (yes, score –1); prepared vascular access on maintenance dialysis (arteriovenous fistula/arteriovenous graft, score –3). In the development cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) for the KSGN score was significantly higher than the Alberta Wick’s score (0.707 vs. 0.683, p = 0.001). In the validation cohort, the KSGN score’s performance was comparable to existing models. Conclusion: The KSGN score may be a valuable tool for predicting early mortality after dialysis initiation in older patients with ESKD, aiding in decision-making and management regarding dialysis initiation.

The increasing detection of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) has raised concerns about overtreatment.For low-risk PTMC, either immediate surgery or active surveillance (AS) can be considered. To support AS implementation, the Korean Thyroid Association convened a multidisciplinary panel and developed the first Korean guideline. AS is recommended to adults with pathologically proven Bethesda V-VI PTMC without clinical evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis, gross extrathyroidal extension, tracheal or recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, or aggressive histology. Baseline assessment requires high‑resolution cervical ultrasound by experienced operators to rule out extrathyroidal extension, tracheal or recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, and lymph node metastasis;contrast‑enhanced neck computed tomography is optional. Patient characteristics such as age, comorbidities, and capacity for long-term follow-up should be assessed. Shared decision-making should weigh the benefits and risks of surgery and AS, expected oncologic outcomes, complications, quality of life, anxiety, medical cost, and patient preference. Follow-up includes cervical ultrasound and thyroid function test every six months for two years, then annually. Disease progression, defined as significant tumor growth or newly detected nodal or distant metastasis, warrants surgery. Despite remaining uncertainties, this guideline offers a framework to ensure oncologic safety and support patient-centered active surveillance.