Effective pain management after abdominal surgery enhances recovery, improves patient satisfaction, and reduces complications. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and recovery protocols, moderate to severe postoperative pain affects up to 55% of patients, leading to delayed recovery, increased opioid use, dependency, and persistent pain. Multimodal analgesia, a core component of enhanced recovery protocols, aims to minimize stress responses, optimize pain relief, and accelerate functional recovery.Current Concepts: Opioids remain pivotal in perioperative pain management due to their effectiveness and adaptability but carry significant side effects, including respiratory depression, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and potential oncological implications. Systemic analgesics, such as glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and gabapentinoids, complement opioids but have limited efficacy and adverse effects. Regional analgesia techniques—epidural blocks, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, erector spinae plane blocks, and quadratus lumborum (QL) blocks—are increasingly important. These methods provide targeted pain relief, reduce opioid requirements, and facilitate recovery, particularly when tailored to specific surgeries.Discussion and Conclusion: Regional anesthesia effectively controls pain, reduces opioid-related complications, and promotes early ambulation. TAP and QL blocks are particularly advantageous for abdominal surgery, reducing pain and opioid use. However, technical challenges and outcome variability necessitate careful patient selection and skilled execution. Optimizing multimodal analgesia through personalized strategies and ongoing research is essential for improving postoperative care.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

Effective pain management after abdominal surgery enhances recovery, improves patient satisfaction, and reduces complications. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and recovery protocols, moderate to severe postoperative pain affects up to 55% of patients, leading to delayed recovery, increased opioid use, dependency, and persistent pain. Multimodal analgesia, a core component of enhanced recovery protocols, aims to minimize stress responses, optimize pain relief, and accelerate functional recovery.Current Concepts: Opioids remain pivotal in perioperative pain management due to their effectiveness and adaptability but carry significant side effects, including respiratory depression, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and potential oncological implications. Systemic analgesics, such as glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and gabapentinoids, complement opioids but have limited efficacy and adverse effects. Regional analgesia techniques—epidural blocks, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, erector spinae plane blocks, and quadratus lumborum (QL) blocks—are increasingly important. These methods provide targeted pain relief, reduce opioid requirements, and facilitate recovery, particularly when tailored to specific surgeries.Discussion and Conclusion: Regional anesthesia effectively controls pain, reduces opioid-related complications, and promotes early ambulation. TAP and QL blocks are particularly advantageous for abdominal surgery, reducing pain and opioid use. However, technical challenges and outcome variability necessitate careful patient selection and skilled execution. Optimizing multimodal analgesia through personalized strategies and ongoing research is essential for improving postoperative care.

It is difficult to determine a cause of bile duct stricture and dilatation. Eosinophilic cholangitis, a rare benign condition, may be one cause of bile duct stricture and dilatation. It can be evaluated using various methods of histopathology, radiographs, endoscopy, and hematologic findings. Treatment generally involves steroid therapy which can lead to improvement. This case report will discuss eosinophilic cholangitis, emphasizing that while it can easily be overlooked but should be considered in differential diagnoses.

Background and Objectives: The risk profiles, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes for women undergoing bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well defined compared to those in men. Methods: COronary BIfurcation Stenting III (COBIS III) is a multicenter, real-world registry of 2,648 patients with bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents.We compared the angiographic and procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes based on sex. The primary outcome was 5-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Results: Women (n=635, 24%) were older, had hypertension and diabetes more often, and had smaller main vessel and side branch reference diameters than men. The pre- and post-PCI angiographic percentage diameter stenoses of the main vessel and side branch were comparable between women and men. There were no differences in procedural characteristics between the sexes. Women and men had a similar risk of TLF (6.3% vs. 7.1%, p=0.63) as well as its individual components and sex was not an independent predictor of TLF. This finding was consistent in the left main and 2 stenting subgroups. Conclusions In patients undergoing bifurcation PCI, sex was not an independent predictor of adverse outcome.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

It is difficult to determine a cause of bile duct stricture and dilatation. Eosinophilic cholangitis, a rare benign condition, may be one cause of bile duct stricture and dilatation. It can be evaluated using various methods of histopathology, radiographs, endoscopy, and hematologic findings. Treatment generally involves steroid therapy which can lead to improvement. This case report will discuss eosinophilic cholangitis, emphasizing that while it can easily be overlooked but should be considered in differential diagnoses.