Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients suffer from lowered quality of life (QoL) after surgery. Breast conservancy surgery (BCS) such as partial mastectomy is being practiced and studied as an alternative to solve this problem. This study confirmed breast tissue reconstruction in a pig model by fabricating a 3-dimensional (3D) printed Polycaprolactone spherical scaffold (PCL ball) to fit the tissue resected after partial mastectomy. METHODS: A 3D printed Polycaprolactone spherical scaffold with a structure that can help adipose tissue regeneration was produced using computer-aided design (CAD). A physical property test was conducted for optimization. In order to enhance biocompatibility, collagen coating was applied and a comparative study was conducted for 3 months in a partial mastectomy pig model. RESULTS: In order to identify adipose tissue and fibroglandular tissue, which mainly constitute breast tissue, the degree of adipose tissue and collagen regeneration was confirmed in a pig model after 3 months. As a result, it was confirmed that a lot of adipose tissue was regenerated in the PCL ball, whereas more collagen was regenerated in the collagen-coated Polycaprolactone spherical scaffold (PCL–COL ball). In addition, as a result of confirming the expression levels of TNF-a and IL-6, it was confirmed that PCL ball showed higher levels than PCL–COL ball. CONCLUSION Through this study, we were able to confirm the regeneration of adipose tissue through a 3-dimensional structure in a pig model. Studies were conducted on medium and large-sized animal models for the final purpose of clinical use and reconstruction of human breast tissue, and the possibility was confirmed.

Background: Anterior choroidal artery (AchA) aneurysms are usually small in diameter because of the size of the involved artery and are often wide-necked. Coil embolization of AchA aneurysm is thus challenging because of serious risks, such as thromboembolic occlusion of artery and perforation of aneurysm dome. Therefore, aneurysmal neck clipping remains widely performed despite a recent increase in the use of coil embolization for aneurysm treatment. We report the treatment results of AchA aneurysms mostly (92.3%) treated with coil embolization at our institute. Methods: The database and medical records of patients who underwent coil embolization for AchA aneurysms were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and imaging results and procedure-related complications were investigated after coil embolization performed between January 2006 and March 2022 at our institute. Results: In total, 96 AchA aneurysms comprising 65 unruptured and 31 ruptured aneurysms, including only 1 ruptured aneurysm (1.0%) re-embolized at postoperative day 192 because of coil compaction, were evaluated. After the initial coil embolization, complete occlusion was attained in 41, residual neck in 45, and residual aneurysm in 10 patients. Follow-up radiological studies after 6–174 months were performed for 80 aneurysms. Complete occlusion was noted in 57 patients, residual neck in 22, and residual aneurysm in 1. The dysarthria experienced by one (1.0%) patient was the only symptomatic procedure-related complication. After coil embolization, neither delayed new rupture nor re-rupture was observed. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that coil embolization is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with AchA aneurysms.

Purpose: Neuroinflammation is considered an important pathway associated with several diseases that result in cognitive decline. 18F-THK5351 positron emission tomography (PET) signals might indicate the presence of neuroinflammation, as well as Alzheimer’s disease-type tau aggregates. β-amyloid (Aβ)-negative (Aβ–) amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) may be associated with non-Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology. Accordingly, we investigated associations between 18F-THK5351 PET positivity and cognitive decline among Aβ– aMCI patients. Materials and Methods: The present study included 25 amyloid PET negative aMCI patients who underwent a minimum of two follow-up neuropsychological evaluations, including clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SOB). The patients were classified into two groups: 18F-THK5351-positive and -negative groups. The present study used a linear mixed effects model to estimate the effects of 18F-THK5351 PET positivity on cognitive prognosis among Aβ– aMCI patients. Results: Among the 25 Aβ– aMCI patients, 10 (40.0%) were 18F-THK5351 positive. The patients in the 18F-THK5351-positive group were older than those in the 18F-THK5351-negative group (77.4±2.2 years vs. 70.0±5.5 years; p<0.001). There was no difference between the two groups with regard to the proportion of apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers. Interestingly, however, the CDR-SOB scores of the 18F-THK5351-positive group deteriorated at a faster rate than those of the 18F-THK5351-negative group (B=0.003, p=0.033). Conclusion The results of the present study suggest that increased 18F-THK5351 uptake might be a useful predictor of poor prognosis among Aβ– aMCI patients, which might be associated with increased neuroinflammation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02656498).

Purpose: This study aimsed to gather opinions from medical educators on the possibility of introducing an interview to the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE) to assess professional attributes. Specifically following topics were dealt with: the appropriate timing and tool to assess unprofessional conduct; ; the possiblity of prevention of unprofessional conduct by introducing an interview to the KMLE; and the possibility of implementation of an interview to the KMLE. Methods: A cross-sectional study approach based on a survey questionnaire was adopted. We analyzed 104 pieces of news about doctors’ unprofessional conduct to determine the deficient professional attributes. We derived 24 items of unprofessional conduct and developed the questionnaire and surveyed 250 members of the Korean Society of Medical Education 2 times. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation analysis, and Fisher’s exact test were applied to the responses. The answers to the open-ended questions were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: In the survey, 49 members (19.6%) responded. Out of 49, 24 (49.5%) responded in the 2nd survey. To assess unprofessional conduct, there was no dominant timing among basic medical education (BME), KMLE, and continuing professional development (CPD). There was no overwhelming assessment tool among written examination, objective structured clinical examination, practice observation, and interview. Response rates of “impossible” (49.0%) and “possible” (42.9%) suggested an interview of the KMLE prevented unprofessional conduct. In terms of implementation, “impossible” (50.0%) was selected more often than “possible” (33.3%). Conclusion Professional attributes should be assessed by various tools over the period from BME to CPD. Hence, it may be impossible to introduce an interview to assess professional attributes to the KMLE, and a system is needed such as self-regulation by the professional body rather than licensing examination.