Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of perceptions of patient safety culture, job stress, and nursing work environment on patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses. Methods: This correlational study was conducted from June 5 to July 31, 2024, and targeted 114 emergency room nurses in Busan. A structured self-report questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses were employed for data analysis. Results: Patient safety nursing activities significantly differed by age (F=6.17, p=.001) and total clinical experience (F=8.89, p<.001) among the participants' general characteristics. Positive correlations were identified with perceptions of patient safety culture (r=.70, p<.001) and nursing work environment (r=.27, p=.003). Multiple regression analysis indicated that perception of patient safety culture (β=.72, p<.001) and total clinical experience (β=-.32, p=.011) were significant predictors, accounting for 50.5% (F=20.24, p<.001) of the variance. Conclusion The findings indicated that perceptions of patient safety culture and total clinical experience are critical factors to be considered when designing interventions to enhance patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of perceptions of patient safety culture, job stress, and nursing work environment on patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses. Methods: This correlational study was conducted from June 5 to July 31, 2024, and targeted 114 emergency room nurses in Busan. A structured self-report questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses were employed for data analysis. Results: Patient safety nursing activities significantly differed by age (F=6.17, p=.001) and total clinical experience (F=8.89, p<.001) among the participants' general characteristics. Positive correlations were identified with perceptions of patient safety culture (r=.70, p<.001) and nursing work environment (r=.27, p=.003). Multiple regression analysis indicated that perception of patient safety culture (β=.72, p<.001) and total clinical experience (β=-.32, p=.011) were significant predictors, accounting for 50.5% (F=20.24, p<.001) of the variance. Conclusion The findings indicated that perceptions of patient safety culture and total clinical experience are critical factors to be considered when designing interventions to enhance patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of perceptions of patient safety culture, job stress, and nursing work environment on patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses. Methods: This correlational study was conducted from June 5 to July 31, 2024, and targeted 114 emergency room nurses in Busan. A structured self-report questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses were employed for data analysis. Results: Patient safety nursing activities significantly differed by age (F=6.17, p=.001) and total clinical experience (F=8.89, p<.001) among the participants' general characteristics. Positive correlations were identified with perceptions of patient safety culture (r=.70, p<.001) and nursing work environment (r=.27, p=.003). Multiple regression analysis indicated that perception of patient safety culture (β=.72, p<.001) and total clinical experience (β=-.32, p=.011) were significant predictors, accounting for 50.5% (F=20.24, p<.001) of the variance. Conclusion The findings indicated that perceptions of patient safety culture and total clinical experience are critical factors to be considered when designing interventions to enhance patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Background: A methodology for comprehensively and reasonably measuring the burden of disease due to adverse events has yet to be clearly established. In this study, a new and systematic method for measuring the burden of disease due to adverse events was tested by utilizing the results of a medical record review, which is commonly used as a gold standard. Methods: Using the characteristics of preventable adverse events identified in the 2019 Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry (PSII), conducted to monitor the level of patient safety in Korea accurately, the resulting disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and economic costs were estimated. DALYs were calculated as the sum of the years lived with a disability for patients who suffered permanent disability, or more, due to preventable adverse events, and the years of life lost due to premature mortality was calculated for patients who died due to preventable adverse events. The economic cost was calculated using the main diagnostic codes of patients who suffered preventable adverse events, identified as prolonged hospitalization in PSII, and the average medical cost by disease category and age group. Results: Estimates of DALYs due to preventable adverse events were 1,114.4 DALYs per 100,000 population for the minimum standard and 1,658.5 DALYs per 100,000 population for the maximum standard. Compared to the 2015 Korea Burden of Disease results, the ranking of DALYs due to preventable adverse events was sixth for the minimum standard and third for the maximum standard. The annual medical cost of adverse events in 2016 was estimated to be approximately Korean Republic Won (KRW) 870 billion (700 million US dollars). Medical expenses due to preventable adverse events were calculated to be approximately KRW 150 billion (120 million US dollars) as a minimum standard and approximately KRW 300 billion (240 million US dollars) as a maximum standard. Conclusion If this more standard method of systematically calculating the disease burden due to adverse events is used, it will be possible to compare the size of the patient safety problem with that of other diseases. The results of this study indicate that we still need to pay more attention to the issue of patient safety.

Quantitative and qualitative research explore various social phenomena using different methods. However, there has been a tendency to treat quantitative studies using complicated statistical techniques as more scientific and superior, whereas relatively few qualitative studies have been conducted in the medical and healthcare fields. This review aimed to provide a proper understanding of qualitative research. This review examined the characteristics of quantitative and qualitative research to help researchers select the appropriate qualitative research methodology. Qualitative research is applicable in following cases: (1) when an exploratory approach is required on a topic that is not well known, (2) when something cannot be explained fully with quantitative research, (3) when it is necessary to newly present a specific view on a research topic that is difficult to explain with existing views, (4) when it is inappropriate to present the rationale or theoretical proposition for designing hypotheses, as in quantitative research, and (5) when conducting research that requires detailed descriptive writing with literary expressions. Qualitative research is conducted in the following order: (1) selection of a research topic and question, (2) selection of a theoretical framework and methods, (3) literature analysis, (4) selection of the research participants and data collection methods, (5) data analysis and description of findings, and (6) research validation. This review can contribute to the more active use of qualitative research in healthcare, and the findings are expected to instill a proper understanding of qualitative research in researchers who review qualitative research reports and papers.

Background: Patient safety is a crucial indicator of health care quality. It is necessary to check the subjective perception of patient safety from the patient’s point of view as a consumer of healthcare services. To identify patients’ experiences of safety and the themes that constitute the patients’ feeling of safety during hospitalization. Methods: A qualitative study, comprising five focus group discussions (seven people each), was conducted in South Korea between May and July 2018. Patients who were hospitalized for at least three days within one year were included. Researchers analyzed the transcribed script, and a content analysis was performed to describe patients’ hospitalized experiences of safety. Results: A total of 35 patients with an average age of 45.4 years participated in the study, and had experience of hospitalization for up to 32 days. The findings revealed four core themes and 14 sub-themes. Patients wanted to take initiative in controlling his/her reception of information and wanted healthcare providers to make the patient feel safe. Patients felt safe when hospitals provided unstinted and generous support. Also, public sentiment about national healthcare and safety made an effect on patient safety sentiment. Conclusion Patients felt safe during hospitalization not only because of the explanation, attitude, and professionalism of the healthcare providers but also because of the support, system, and procedure of the medical institution. Healthcare providers and medical institutions should strive to narrow the gap in patient safety awareness factors through activities with patients. Furthermore, the government and society should make an effort to create a safe medical environment and social atmosphere.