Reference management software (RMS) represents a cornerstone of modern academic writing and publishing. For decades, programs such as EndNote, Zotero, and Mendeley have played central roles in facilitating citation organization, bibliography formatting, and collaborative scholarship. Although each platform has introduced unique innovations, persistent limitations remain, particularly with respect to usability, accessibility, and accuracy. In parallel, the rise of generative artificial intelligence has introduced an unprecedented challenge: the inadvertent inclusion of fabricated or incorrect references mistakenly incorporated into manuscripts. This phenomenon has exposed a critical limitation of traditional RMS platforms, namely their inability to verify reference authenticity. Against this backdrop, new solutions have emerged. One such example is CiteWell (https://citewell.org/), an artificial intelligence (AI)-era RMS that introduces several notable innovations, including PubMed-integrated verification, an intuitive interface for new users, customizable journal-specific styles, and multilingual accessibility. This review provides a comprehensive historical overview of RMS, evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of major platforms, and positions emerging AI-based tools as a new paradigm that combines traditional reference management with essential safeguards for contemporary academic challenges.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of perceptions of patient safety culture, job stress, and nursing work environment on patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses. Methods: This correlational study was conducted from June 5 to July 31, 2024, and targeted 114 emergency room nurses in Busan. A structured self-report questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses were employed for data analysis. Results: Patient safety nursing activities significantly differed by age (F=6.17, p=.001) and total clinical experience (F=8.89, p<.001) among the participants' general characteristics. Positive correlations were identified with perceptions of patient safety culture (r=.70, p<.001) and nursing work environment (r=.27, p=.003). Multiple regression analysis indicated that perception of patient safety culture (β=.72, p<.001) and total clinical experience (β=-.32, p=.011) were significant predictors, accounting for 50.5% (F=20.24, p<.001) of the variance. Conclusion The findings indicated that perceptions of patient safety culture and total clinical experience are critical factors to be considered when designing interventions to enhance patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of perceptions of patient safety culture, job stress, and nursing work environment on patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses. Methods: This correlational study was conducted from June 5 to July 31, 2024, and targeted 114 emergency room nurses in Busan. A structured self-report questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses were employed for data analysis. Results: Patient safety nursing activities significantly differed by age (F=6.17, p=.001) and total clinical experience (F=8.89, p<.001) among the participants' general characteristics. Positive correlations were identified with perceptions of patient safety culture (r=.70, p<.001) and nursing work environment (r=.27, p=.003). Multiple regression analysis indicated that perception of patient safety culture (β=.72, p<.001) and total clinical experience (β=-.32, p=.011) were significant predictors, accounting for 50.5% (F=20.24, p<.001) of the variance. Conclusion The findings indicated that perceptions of patient safety culture and total clinical experience are critical factors to be considered when designing interventions to enhance patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the levels of clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and nursing work performance ability and to identify factors influencing nursing work performance ability among emergency room nurses. Methods: This study emploved a descriptive correlational research design. A total of 137 emergency room nurses, were participated. Data were collected at three tertiary hospitals located in city B, from June 1 to August 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis using IBM SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The average score of clinical decision-making ability was 3.31, while role conflict and nursing work performance ability both had an average score of 3.77. Factors influencing nursing work performance ability included clinical decision-making ability, role conflict, and annual salary, which explained 20.0% of the variance in nursing work performance ability. Conclusion Clinical decision-making ability and role conflict significantly impact nursing work performance among emergency room nurses. Strategies to enhance clinical decision-making skills and mitigate role conflict should be developed at the organizational level. Additionally, further research is needed to on appropriate compensation systems and institutional measures to enhance nursing work performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of perceptions of patient safety culture, job stress, and nursing work environment on patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses. Methods: This correlational study was conducted from June 5 to July 31, 2024, and targeted 114 emergency room nurses in Busan. A structured self-report questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses were employed for data analysis. Results: Patient safety nursing activities significantly differed by age (F=6.17, p=.001) and total clinical experience (F=8.89, p<.001) among the participants' general characteristics. Positive correlations were identified with perceptions of patient safety culture (r=.70, p<.001) and nursing work environment (r=.27, p=.003). Multiple regression analysis indicated that perception of patient safety culture (β=.72, p<.001) and total clinical experience (β=-.32, p=.011) were significant predictors, accounting for 50.5% (F=20.24, p<.001) of the variance. Conclusion The findings indicated that perceptions of patient safety culture and total clinical experience are critical factors to be considered when designing interventions to enhance patient safety nursing activities among emergency room nurses.

Background: It is well known that adequate water intake and moisturizer application improves skin barrier function. Objective: This study was conducted to analyze the effects of daily water intake and moisturizer application on skin barrier function and the degree of response to barrier recovery. Methods: Participants with daily water intake more than 1 L were classified as high daily water intake group (H) and those with less than 1 L as low daily water intake group (L). Each group was subcategorized into four groups according to intervention method: additional water intake (H1, L1), moisturizer (H2, L2), both (H3, L3), and control (H4, L4). Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) were measured at baseline during the 2nd and 4th week. Results: A total of 43 participants completed the study (H: 22, L: 21). At baseline, there was no significant difference in SCH and TEWL in any on the anatomical sites between the high daily water intake and low daily water intake groups. However, SCHs of left forearm (group H2, p=0.004; group H3, p=0.004), left hand dorsum (group H2, p=0.010; group H3, p=0.026), and left shin (group H2, p=0.016; group H3, p=0.001) in group H2 and H3 were significantly increased in the 4th week as compared to the baseline values. Conclusion The results suggest that the degree of water intake may be related to improved skin barrier function. However, application of additional moisturizers had more favorable impact on skin hydration as compared to additional water intake.

Quantitative and qualitative research explore various social phenomena using different methods. However, there has been a tendency to treat quantitative studies using complicated statistical techniques as more scientific and superior, whereas relatively few qualitative studies have been conducted in the medical and healthcare fields. This review aimed to provide a proper understanding of qualitative research. This review examined the characteristics of quantitative and qualitative research to help researchers select the appropriate qualitative research methodology. Qualitative research is applicable in following cases: (1) when an exploratory approach is required on a topic that is not well known, (2) when something cannot be explained fully with quantitative research, (3) when it is necessary to newly present a specific view on a research topic that is difficult to explain with existing views, (4) when it is inappropriate to present the rationale or theoretical proposition for designing hypotheses, as in quantitative research, and (5) when conducting research that requires detailed descriptive writing with literary expressions. Qualitative research is conducted in the following order: (1) selection of a research topic and question, (2) selection of a theoretical framework and methods, (3) literature analysis, (4) selection of the research participants and data collection methods, (5) data analysis and description of findings, and (6) research validation. This review can contribute to the more active use of qualitative research in healthcare, and the findings are expected to instill a proper understanding of qualitative research in researchers who review qualitative research reports and papers.