Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Purpose: Although some medications trigger the worsening of myasthenia gravis (MG), their clinical influence on patients with MG has not been significantly evaluated. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of clinical worsening of MG increases after administering cautionary drugs in patients with MG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the medical records of patients diagnosed with MG between 2007 and 2020. We analyzed the risk of MG worsening in patients exposed to cautionary drugs during the risk period, defined as 6 months from the first exposure to cautionary drugs. The risk of MG worsening in the exposed patients was compared to that in the non-exposed patients, who were individually matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed cases for sex, age, thymoma, and autoantibodies. Results: Of the 2002 patients diagnosed with MG, 552 (27.6%) were exposed to cautionary drugs. Neuromuscular blocking agents (320 patients) and beta blockers (66123 person-days) were the most frequently prescribed medications. After exact matching, 220 exposed and 220 non-exposed patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of clinical worsening during the risk period was significantly higher in the exposed patients than in the non-exposed patients (odds ratio=4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.90;p<0.001). Clinical worsening was observed in 31 (14.1%) of the exposed patients and in 8 (3.6%) of the non-exposed patients. Conclusion The administration of cautionary drugs increased the risk of clinical worsening in patients with MG. Clinicians should be aware of this risk when cautionary drugs need to be administered.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

Despite the widespread impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) and vaccination in South Korea, our understanding of kidney diseases following these events remains limited. We aimed to address this gap by investigating the characteristics of glomerular diseases following the COVID-19 infection and vaccination in South Korea. Methods: Data from multiple centers were used to identify de novo glomerulonephritis (GN) cases with suspected onset following COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Retrospective surveys were used to determine the COVID-19–related histories of patients who were initially not implicated. Bayesian structural time series and autoregressive integrated moving average models were used to determine causality. Results: Glomerular diseases occurred shortly after the infection or vaccination. The most prevalent postinfection GN was podocytopathy (42.9%), comprising primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease, whereas postvaccination GN mainly included immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN; 57.9%) and Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSP; 15.8%). No patient progressed to end-stage kidney disease. Among the patients who were initially not implicated, nine patients with IgAN/HSP were recently vaccinated against COVID-19. The proportion of glomerular diseases changed during the pandemic in South Korea, with an increase in acute interstitial nephritis and a decrease in pauci-immune crescentic GN. Conclusion: This study showed the characteristics of GNs following COVID-19 infection or vaccination in South Korea. Understanding these associations is crucial for developing effective patient management and vaccination strategies. Further investigation is required to fully comprehend COVID-19’s impact on GN.