Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect.

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect.

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect.

Background: The benefits of transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are uncertain because of the limited availability of device selection. This study aimed to compare the procedural differences and the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of TRA and TFA for bifurcation PCI using secondgeneration drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods: Based on data from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry III, a retrospective registry of 2,648 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI with second-generation DES from 21 centers in South Korea, patients were categorized into the TRA group (n = 1,507) or the TFA group (n = 1,141). After propensity score matching (PSM), procedural differences, in-hospital outcomes, and device-oriented composite outcomes (DOCOs; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) were compared between the two groups (772 matched patients each group). Results: Despite well-balanced baseline clinical and lesion characteristics after PSM, the use of the two-stent strategy (14.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.001) and the incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes, primarily driven by access site complications (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.015), were significantly lower in the TRA group than in the TFA group. At the 5-year follow-up, the incidence of DOCOs was similar between the groups (6.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.639). Conclusion The findings suggested that TRA may be safer than TFA for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DESs. Despite differences in treatment strategy, TRA was associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes as those of TFA. Therefore, TRA might be the preferred access for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DES.