Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Methods: The medical records of 151 patients with ASD who underwent correction surgery between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Estimated blood loss and perioperative allogeneic transfusion were examined. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they received perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the effect of age, sex, blood type, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status, preoperative hemoglobin level, autologous blood donation, global spine alignment parameters, preoperative use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet medicine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, number of instrumented fusion levels, total operative duration, three-column osteotomy, lateral interbody fusion, pelvic fixation, intraoperative hypothermia, use of gelatin-thrombin based hemostatic agents, and intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) with simultaneous exposure by two attending surgeons. Results: The estimated blood loss was 994.2±754.5 mL, and 71 patients (47.0%) received allogeneic blood transfusion. In the logistic regression analysis, the absence of intraoperative TXA use and simultaneous exposure (odds ratio [OR], 26.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6–90.9; p<0.001), lack of autologous blood donation (OR, 21.2; 95% CI, 4.4–100.0; p<0.001), and prolonged operative duration (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3–1.9; p<0.001) were significant independent factors for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in ASD surgery. Conclusions Autologous blood storage, intraoperative TXA administration, and simultaneous exposure should be considered to minimize perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in ASD surgery, particularly in patients with anticipated lengthy surgeries.

Methods: The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment. Results: Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4). Conclusions Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

Methods: The study included data from 100 patients who underwent ASD surgery between 2012 and 2020. Fifteen of these patients presented with RFs. Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographic parameters were evaluated in each group. Results: RFs were significantly more frequent in patients with a medical history of total hip arthroplasty (THA; p=0.01) or severe obesity (p=0.04). However, no significant differences in clinical outcomes, preoperative or postoperative measurements, or changes were found between pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters within the groups. Both pre- (p=0.01) and postoperative (p=0.02) anterior disc heights were significantly greater in the RF group than in the non-RF group. In the RF group, the postoperative lordotic angles of the lumbosacral junction significantly decreased compared with preoperative angles (p=0.02). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a THA history (odds ratio, 34.2), severe obesity (odds ratio, 14.0), and preoperative anterior disc height (odds ratio, 1.2) were significant risk factors for RFs. Conclusions In this study, the greatest risk factors for postoperative lumbosacral RF after ASD surgery were THA history, severe obesity, and postoperative anterior disc height of ≥10. For patients at higher risk, the use of multirods is considered necessary.

Methods: This study included 99 men (mean age, 74.9 years; range, 28–93 years) who visited Qiball Clinic for BMD and body composition examinations. The osteoporosis group consisted of 24 patients (mean age, 72.5 years; range, 44–92 years), and the control group consisted of 75 individuals (mean age, 74.9 years; range, 28–93 years). Whole-body skeletal muscle mass was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer. BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Skin autofluorescence (SAF), a marker of dermal AGE accumulation, was measured using a spectroscope. Osteoporosis was defined as a bone density T score of –2.5 or less. Physical findings, skeletal muscle mass, BMD, grip strength, and SAF were compared between the osteoporosis and control groups. Results: The osteoporosis group had significantly lower trunk muscle mass (23.1 kg vs. 24.9 kg), lower leg muscle mass (14.4 kg vs. 13.0 kg), and skeletal mass index (7.1 kg/m2 vs. 6.7 kg/m2) than the control group (all p<0.05). Lower limb muscle mass was identified as a risk factor for osteoporosis in men (odds ratio, 0.64; p=0.03). Conclusions Conservative treatment of osteoporosis in men will require an effective approach that facilitates the maintenance or strengthening of skeletal muscle mass, including exercise therapy with a focus on lower extremities and nutritional supplementation.

Methods: This study included 50 patients with CSM and 39 with C-OPLL who underwent multi-segment laminoplasty. Decreased CL was defined as the difference between preoperative and 2-year postoperative neutral C2–7 Cobb angles. Radiographic parameters included preoperative neutral C2–7 Cobb angles, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1S), dynamic extension reserve (DER), and range of motion. The radiographic risk factors were investigated for decreased CL in CSM and C-OPLL. Additionally, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Results: C2–7 SVA (p =0.018) and DER (p =0.002) were significantly correlated with decreased CL in CSM, while C2–7 Cobb angle (p =0.012) and C2–7 SVA (p =0.028) were correlated with decreased CL in C-OPLL. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that greater C2–7 SVA (B =0.22, p =0.026) and small DER (B =−0.53, p =0.002) were significantly associated with decreased CL in CSM. By contrast, greater C2–7 SVA (B =0.36, p =0.031) was significantly associated with decreased CL in C-OPLL. The JOA score significantly improved in both CSM and C-OPLL (p <0.001). Conclusions C2–7 SVA was associated with a postoperative decreased CL in both CSM and C-OPLL, but DER was only associated with decreased CL in CSM. Risk factors for decreased CL slightly differed depending on the etiology of the condition.