Background: The 16S rRNA-targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used as the primary tool for microbiome analysis. However, whether the sequenced microbial diversity absolutely represents the original sample composition remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether 16S rRNA gene-targeted NGS accurately captures bacterial community composition. Methods: Mock communities were constructed using equal amounts of DNA from 18 bacterial strains in three formats: genomic DNA, recombinant plasmids, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) templates. The V3V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq. Results: Data regression analysis revealed that the recombinant plasmid produced more accurate and precise correlation curve than that by the gDNA and PCR products, with a slope closest to 1 (1.0082) and the highest R² value (0.9975). Despite the same input amount of bacterial DNA, the NGS read distribution varied across all three mock communities. Using multiple regression analysis, we found that the guanine-cytosine (GC) content of the V3V4 region, 16S rRNA gene, size of gDNA, and copy number of 16S rRNA were significantly associated with the NGS output of each bacterial species. Conclusion This study demonstrated that recombinant plasmids are the preferred option for quality control and that NGS output is biased owing to certain bacterial characteristics, such as %GC content, gDNA size, and 16S rRNA gene copy number. Further research is required to develop a system that compensates for NGS process biases using mock communities.

Background: The 16S rRNA-targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used as the primary tool for microbiome analysis. However, whether the sequenced microbial diversity absolutely represents the original sample composition remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether 16S rRNA gene-targeted NGS accurately captures bacterial community composition. Methods: Mock communities were constructed using equal amounts of DNA from 18 bacterial strains in three formats: genomic DNA, recombinant plasmids, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) templates. The V3V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq. Results: Data regression analysis revealed that the recombinant plasmid produced more accurate and precise correlation curve than that by the gDNA and PCR products, with a slope closest to 1 (1.0082) and the highest R² value (0.9975). Despite the same input amount of bacterial DNA, the NGS read distribution varied across all three mock communities. Using multiple regression analysis, we found that the guanine-cytosine (GC) content of the V3V4 region, 16S rRNA gene, size of gDNA, and copy number of 16S rRNA were significantly associated with the NGS output of each bacterial species. Conclusion This study demonstrated that recombinant plasmids are the preferred option for quality control and that NGS output is biased owing to certain bacterial characteristics, such as %GC content, gDNA size, and 16S rRNA gene copy number. Further research is required to develop a system that compensates for NGS process biases using mock communities.

Background: The 16S rRNA-targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used as the primary tool for microbiome analysis. However, whether the sequenced microbial diversity absolutely represents the original sample composition remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether 16S rRNA gene-targeted NGS accurately captures bacterial community composition. Methods: Mock communities were constructed using equal amounts of DNA from 18 bacterial strains in three formats: genomic DNA, recombinant plasmids, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) templates. The V3V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq. Results: Data regression analysis revealed that the recombinant plasmid produced more accurate and precise correlation curve than that by the gDNA and PCR products, with a slope closest to 1 (1.0082) and the highest R² value (0.9975). Despite the same input amount of bacterial DNA, the NGS read distribution varied across all three mock communities. Using multiple regression analysis, we found that the guanine-cytosine (GC) content of the V3V4 region, 16S rRNA gene, size of gDNA, and copy number of 16S rRNA were significantly associated with the NGS output of each bacterial species. Conclusion This study demonstrated that recombinant plasmids are the preferred option for quality control and that NGS output is biased owing to certain bacterial characteristics, such as %GC content, gDNA size, and 16S rRNA gene copy number. Further research is required to develop a system that compensates for NGS process biases using mock communities.

Background: The 16S rRNA-targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used as the primary tool for microbiome analysis. However, whether the sequenced microbial diversity absolutely represents the original sample composition remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether 16S rRNA gene-targeted NGS accurately captures bacterial community composition. Methods: Mock communities were constructed using equal amounts of DNA from 18 bacterial strains in three formats: genomic DNA, recombinant plasmids, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) templates. The V3V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq. Results: Data regression analysis revealed that the recombinant plasmid produced more accurate and precise correlation curve than that by the gDNA and PCR products, with a slope closest to 1 (1.0082) and the highest R² value (0.9975). Despite the same input amount of bacterial DNA, the NGS read distribution varied across all three mock communities. Using multiple regression analysis, we found that the guanine-cytosine (GC) content of the V3V4 region, 16S rRNA gene, size of gDNA, and copy number of 16S rRNA were significantly associated with the NGS output of each bacterial species. Conclusion This study demonstrated that recombinant plasmids are the preferred option for quality control and that NGS output is biased owing to certain bacterial characteristics, such as %GC content, gDNA size, and 16S rRNA gene copy number. Further research is required to develop a system that compensates for NGS process biases using mock communities.

Background: The 16S rRNA-targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used as the primary tool for microbiome analysis. However, whether the sequenced microbial diversity absolutely represents the original sample composition remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether 16S rRNA gene-targeted NGS accurately captures bacterial community composition. Methods: Mock communities were constructed using equal amounts of DNA from 18 bacterial strains in three formats: genomic DNA, recombinant plasmids, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) templates. The V3V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq. Results: Data regression analysis revealed that the recombinant plasmid produced more accurate and precise correlation curve than that by the gDNA and PCR products, with a slope closest to 1 (1.0082) and the highest R² value (0.9975). Despite the same input amount of bacterial DNA, the NGS read distribution varied across all three mock communities. Using multiple regression analysis, we found that the guanine-cytosine (GC) content of the V3V4 region, 16S rRNA gene, size of gDNA, and copy number of 16S rRNA were significantly associated with the NGS output of each bacterial species. Conclusion This study demonstrated that recombinant plasmids are the preferred option for quality control and that NGS output is biased owing to certain bacterial characteristics, such as %GC content, gDNA size, and 16S rRNA gene copy number. Further research is required to develop a system that compensates for NGS process biases using mock communities.

Actinidia arguta, also called as kiwiberry or hardy kiwifruit, is one of the major varieties of kiwi plants. It is small in size and has no hairs on the surface, which making it easy to be consumed. In addition, it can be cultivated in Asia, due to its cold resistance. We have been interested in the beneficial effects of the fruits of A. arguta and investigated the constituents and biological activities. A new triterpenoid, argutinic acid, along with three triterpenoids and three megastigmines were isolated from the fruits of A. arguta. The structures were determined by spectroscopic analysis including NMR, MS, UV and IR. Among the isolated compounds, two triterpenes, argutinic acid (1) and usrolic acid (4) showed α-glucosidase inhibitory activities.

Purpose: This study explored the feasibility of utilizing a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect ileocolic intussusception on grayscale ultrasound images. Methods: This retrospective observational study incorporated ultrasound images of children who underwent emergency ultrasonography for suspected ileocolic intussusception. After excluding video clips, Doppler images, and annotated images, 40,765 images from two tertiary hospitals were included (positive-to-negative ratio: hospital A, 2,775:35,373; hospital B, 140:2,477). Images from hospital A were split into a training set, a tuning set, and an internal test set (ITS) at a ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. Images from hospital B comprised an external test set (ETS). For each image indicating intussusception, two radiologists provided a bounding box as the ground-truth label. If intussusception was suspected in the input image, the model generated a bounding box with a confidence score (0-1) at the estimated lesion location. Average precision (AP) was used to evaluate overall model performance. The performance of practical thresholds for the modelgenerated confidence score, as determined from the ITS, was verified using the ETS. Results: The AP values for the ITS and ETS were 0.952 and 0.936, respectively. Two confidence thresholds, CTopt and CTprecision, were set at 0.557 and 0.790, respectively. For the ETS, the perimage precision and recall were 95.7% and 80.0% with CTopt, and 98.4% and 44.3% with CTprecision. For per-patient diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 97.1% with CTopt, and 100.0% and 99.0% with CTprecision. The average number of false positives per patient was 0.04 with CTopt and 0.01 for CTprecision. Conclusion The feasibility of using an AI model to diagnose ileocolic intussusception on ultrasonography was demonstrated. However, further study involving bias-free data is warranted for robust clinical validation.

Purpose: This study explored the feasibility of utilizing a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect ileocolic intussusception on grayscale ultrasound images. Methods: This retrospective observational study incorporated ultrasound images of children who underwent emergency ultrasonography for suspected ileocolic intussusception. After excluding video clips, Doppler images, and annotated images, 40,765 images from two tertiary hospitals were included (positive-to-negative ratio: hospital A, 2,775:35,373; hospital B, 140:2,477). Images from hospital A were split into a training set, a tuning set, and an internal test set (ITS) at a ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. Images from hospital B comprised an external test set (ETS). For each image indicating intussusception, two radiologists provided a bounding box as the ground-truth label. If intussusception was suspected in the input image, the model generated a bounding box with a confidence score (0-1) at the estimated lesion location. Average precision (AP) was used to evaluate overall model performance. The performance of practical thresholds for the modelgenerated confidence score, as determined from the ITS, was verified using the ETS. Results: The AP values for the ITS and ETS were 0.952 and 0.936, respectively. Two confidence thresholds, CTopt and CTprecision, were set at 0.557 and 0.790, respectively. For the ETS, the perimage precision and recall were 95.7% and 80.0% with CTopt, and 98.4% and 44.3% with CTprecision. For per-patient diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 97.1% with CTopt, and 100.0% and 99.0% with CTprecision. The average number of false positives per patient was 0.04 with CTopt and 0.01 for CTprecision. Conclusion The feasibility of using an AI model to diagnose ileocolic intussusception on ultrasonography was demonstrated. However, further study involving bias-free data is warranted for robust clinical validation.

Purpose: This study explored the feasibility of utilizing a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect ileocolic intussusception on grayscale ultrasound images. Methods: This retrospective observational study incorporated ultrasound images of children who underwent emergency ultrasonography for suspected ileocolic intussusception. After excluding video clips, Doppler images, and annotated images, 40,765 images from two tertiary hospitals were included (positive-to-negative ratio: hospital A, 2,775:35,373; hospital B, 140:2,477). Images from hospital A were split into a training set, a tuning set, and an internal test set (ITS) at a ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. Images from hospital B comprised an external test set (ETS). For each image indicating intussusception, two radiologists provided a bounding box as the ground-truth label. If intussusception was suspected in the input image, the model generated a bounding box with a confidence score (0-1) at the estimated lesion location. Average precision (AP) was used to evaluate overall model performance. The performance of practical thresholds for the modelgenerated confidence score, as determined from the ITS, was verified using the ETS. Results: The AP values for the ITS and ETS were 0.952 and 0.936, respectively. Two confidence thresholds, CTopt and CTprecision, were set at 0.557 and 0.790, respectively. For the ETS, the perimage precision and recall were 95.7% and 80.0% with CTopt, and 98.4% and 44.3% with CTprecision. For per-patient diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 97.1% with CTopt, and 100.0% and 99.0% with CTprecision. The average number of false positives per patient was 0.04 with CTopt and 0.01 for CTprecision. Conclusion The feasibility of using an AI model to diagnose ileocolic intussusception on ultrasonography was demonstrated. However, further study involving bias-free data is warranted for robust clinical validation.

Purpose: This study explored the feasibility of utilizing a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect ileocolic intussusception on grayscale ultrasound images. Methods: This retrospective observational study incorporated ultrasound images of children who underwent emergency ultrasonography for suspected ileocolic intussusception. After excluding video clips, Doppler images, and annotated images, 40,765 images from two tertiary hospitals were included (positive-to-negative ratio: hospital A, 2,775:35,373; hospital B, 140:2,477). Images from hospital A were split into a training set, a tuning set, and an internal test set (ITS) at a ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. Images from hospital B comprised an external test set (ETS). For each image indicating intussusception, two radiologists provided a bounding box as the ground-truth label. If intussusception was suspected in the input image, the model generated a bounding box with a confidence score (0-1) at the estimated lesion location. Average precision (AP) was used to evaluate overall model performance. The performance of practical thresholds for the modelgenerated confidence score, as determined from the ITS, was verified using the ETS. Results: The AP values for the ITS and ETS were 0.952 and 0.936, respectively. Two confidence thresholds, CTopt and CTprecision, were set at 0.557 and 0.790, respectively. For the ETS, the perimage precision and recall were 95.7% and 80.0% with CTopt, and 98.4% and 44.3% with CTprecision. For per-patient diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 97.1% with CTopt, and 100.0% and 99.0% with CTprecision. The average number of false positives per patient was 0.04 with CTopt and 0.01 for CTprecision. Conclusion The feasibility of using an AI model to diagnose ileocolic intussusception on ultrasonography was demonstrated. However, further study involving bias-free data is warranted for robust clinical validation.