1.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
2.Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, and pneumatic dilation for patients with achalasia: a United States national experience
Dushyant Singh DAHIYA ; Bhanu Siva Mohan PINNAM ; Saurabh CHANDAN ; Hassam ALI ; Manesh Kumar GANGWANI ; Amir Humza SOHAIL ; Dennis YANG ; Amit RASTOGI
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(1):153-157
3.Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, and pneumatic dilation for patients with achalasia: a United States national experience
Dushyant Singh DAHIYA ; Bhanu Siva Mohan PINNAM ; Saurabh CHANDAN ; Hassam ALI ; Manesh Kumar GANGWANI ; Amir Humza SOHAIL ; Dennis YANG ; Amit RASTOGI
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(1):153-157
4.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
5.Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, and pneumatic dilation for patients with achalasia: a United States national experience
Dushyant Singh DAHIYA ; Bhanu Siva Mohan PINNAM ; Saurabh CHANDAN ; Hassam ALI ; Manesh Kumar GANGWANI ; Amir Humza SOHAIL ; Dennis YANG ; Amit RASTOGI
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(1):153-157
6.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
7.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
8.Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for bleeding gastric varices in a patient without a gastrorenal shunt
Saurabh KUMAR ; Apoorva BATRA ; Rinkesh BANSAL ; Reyaz PARA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2024;13(2):51-54
Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is an endovascular technique frequently employed in the management of bleeding gastric varices among patients with portal hypertension. Bleeding from gastric varices is associated with higher mortality and morbidity compared to bleeding from esophageal varices, which are typically managed endoscopically. Compared to other interventions for gastric varices, BRTO is less invasive and can be performed in patients with poor hepatic reserve. The procedure involves occlusion of the outflow of the portosystemic shunt— often a gastrorenal shunt—using an occlusion balloon, followed by injection of a sclerosant into the varix. In this report, we describe a technique for accessing gastric varices that lack a gastrorenal shunt; this is accomplished using alternative shunt routes, such as the inferior phrenic vein. The reported approach is technically challenging due to the relatively small size of these shunts and the scarcity of cases documented in the literature regarding their use.
9.Rescue therapy for bleeding ectopic ileal varices with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and antegrade variceal embolization
Saurabh KUMAR ; Arvind Kumar KHURANA ; Apoorva BATRA ; Deepanshu KHANNA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2024;13(4):141-143
Portal hypertension, a known complication of liver cirrhosis, typically leads to variceal bleeding in the esophagus and stomach. However, ectopic varices can also occur outside the gastroesophageal region and may present with life-threatening massive bleeding. We report a case of bleeding ileal ectopic varices in a patient with cirrhosis that were not detected during routine endoscopy. These varices were ultimately diagnosed with the aid of abdominal computed tomography. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was created to decrease portal pressure, and the TIPS tract was then used to selectively embolize the bleeding ectopic ileal varices.
10.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail