4.Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2018
Tae Wook KONG ; Hee Sug RYU ; Seung Cheol KIM ; Takayuki ENOMOTO ; Jin LI ; Kenneth H KIM ; Seung Hyuk SHIM ; Peng Hui WANG ; Suwanit THERASAKVICHYA ; Yusuke KOBAYASHI ; Maria LEE ; Tingyan SHI ; Shin Wha LEE ; Mikio MIKAMI ; Satoru NAGASE ; Myong Cheol LIM ; Jianliu WANG ; Sarikapan WILAILAK ; Sang Wun KIM ; Sook Hee HONG ; David SP TAN ; Masaki MANDAI ; Suk Joon CHANG ; Ruby Yun Ju HUANG ; Kimio USHIJIMA ; Jung Yun LEE ; Xiaojun CHEN ; Kazunori OCHIAI ; Taek Sang LEE ; Bingyi YANG ; Farhana KALAM ; Qiaoying LV ; Mohd Faizal AHMAD ; Muhammad Rizki YAZNIL ; Kanika Batra MODI ; Manatsawee MANOPUNYA ; Dae Hoon JEONG ; Arb aroon LERTKHACHONSUK ; Hyun Hoon CHUNG ; Hidemichi WATARI ; Seob JEON
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2019;30(2):e39-
The Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2018 on gynecologic oncology was held in the Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea on the 24th to 25th August 2018. The workshop was an opportunity for Asian doctors to discuss the latest findings of gynecologic cancer, including cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, as well as the future of fertility-sparing treatments, minimally invasive/radical/debulking surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Clinical guidelines and position statement of Asian countries were presented by experts. Asian clinical trials for gynecologic cancers were reviewed and experts emphasized the point that original Asian study is beneficial for Asian patients. In Junior session, young gynecologic oncologists presented their latest research on gynecologic cancers.
Antineoplastic Agents
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Drug Therapy
;
Education
;
Endometrial Neoplasms
;
Female
;
Gyeonggi-do
;
Humans
;
Immunotherapy
;
Korea
;
Ovarian Neoplasms
;
Radiotherapy
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
5.The epidemiologic status of gynecologic cancer in Thailand.
Sarikapan WILAILAK ; Nuttapong LERTCHAIPATTANAKUL
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2016;27(6):e65-
Between the years of 2010–2012, it was estimated there were a total of 112,392 new cases of cancers in Thailand, thus, the total age-standardized rate (ASR) per 100,000 is 137.6. In regards to the most prevalent types of cancer in female, breast cancer has the highest ASR, followed by cervical cancer (ASR=14.4); liver and bile duct cancer; colon and rectum cancer; trachea, bronchus and lung cancer; ovarian cancer (ASR=6.0); thyroid cancer; non-Hodgkin lymphoma and uterine cancer (ASR=4.3). The trend of cervical cancer in Thailand is decreasing, one key factor in making this possible was the employment of dual tract strategy (Pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid [VIA]) by the government in 2005. In the future, the government is also considering integrating human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination into the national immunization program, which may assist in the prevention of cervical cancer. By studying the statistical data of gynecologic cancer, it will be possible to formulate measures for the prevention, control and treatment of gynecologic cancer. Eventually, it will potentially improve the quality of life (QoL) of patients as well as decrease the mortality rate caused by gynecologic cancer.
Acetic Acid
;
Aged
;
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology/pathology
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Female
;
Genital Neoplasms, Female/*epidemiology/prevention & control
;
Humans
;
Middle Aged
;
Papanicolaou Test
;
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control
;
Papillomavirus Vaccines
;
Quality of Life
;
Thailand/epidemiology
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology/pathology/prevention & control
;
Uterine Neoplasms/epidemiology
;
Vaginal Smears
6.Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2014.
Jeong Yeol PARK ; Hextan Yuen Sheung NGAN ; Won PARK ; Zeyi CAO ; Xiaohua WU ; Woong JU ; Hyun Hoon CHUNG ; Suk Joon CHANG ; Sang Yoon PARK ; Sang Young RYU ; Jae Hoon KIM ; Chi Heum CHO ; Keun Ho LEE ; Jeong Won LEE ; Suresh KUMARASAMY ; Jae Weon KIM ; Sarikapan WILAILAK ; Byoung Gie KIM ; Dae Yeon KIM ; Ikuo KONISHI ; Jae Kwan LEE ; Kung Liahng WANG ; Joo Hyun NAM
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2015;26(1):68-74
The Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2014 on gynecologic oncology was held in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea on the 23rd to 24th August 2014. A total of 179 participants from 17 countries participated in the workshop, and the up-to-date findings on the management of gynecologic cancers were presented and discussed. This meeting focused on the new trends in the management of cervical cancer, fertility-sparing management of gynecologic cancers, surgical management of gynecologic cancers, and recent advances in translational research on gynecologic cancers.
Female
;
Fertility Preservation/methods
;
Genital Neoplasms, Female/*therapy
;
Humans
;
Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy
;
Translational Medical Research/methods
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
7.Distinguishing benign from malignant pelvic mass utilizing an algorithm with HE4, menopausal status, and ultrasound findings.
Sarikapan WILAILAK ; Karen K L CHAN ; Chi An CHEN ; Joo Hyun NAM ; Kazunori OCHIAI ; Tar Choon AW ; Subathra SABARATNAM ; Sudarshan HEBBAR ; Jaganathan SICKAN ; Beth A SCHODIN ; Chuenkamon CHARAKORN ; Walfrido W SUMPAICO
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2015;26(1):46-53
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a risk prediction score for distinguishing benign ovarian mass from malignant tumors using CA-125, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), ultrasound findings, and menopausal status. The risk prediction score was compared to the risk of malignancy index and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter (n=6) study with patients from six Asian countries. Patients had a pelvic mass upon imaging and were scheduled to undergo surgery. Serum CA-125 and HE4 were measured on preoperative samples, and ultrasound findings were recorded. Regression analysis was performed and a risk prediction model was developed based on the significant factors. A bootstrap technique was applied to assess the validity of the HE4 model. RESULTS: A total of 414 women with a pelvic mass were enrolled in the study, of which 328 had documented ultrasound findings. The risk prediction model that contained HE4, menopausal status, and ultrasound findings exhibited the best performance compared to models with CA-125 alone, or a combination of CA-125 and HE4. This model classified 77.2% of women with ovarian cancer as medium or high risk, and 86% of women with benign disease as very-low, low, or medium-low risk. This model exhibited better sensitivity than ROMA, but ROMA exhibited better specificity. Both models performed better than CA-125 alone. CONCLUSION: Combining ultrasound with HE4 can improve the sensitivity for detecting ovarian cancer compared to other algorithms.
Adult
;
*Algorithms
;
Biomarkers, Tumor/*blood
;
CA-125 Antigen/blood
;
Decision Support Techniques
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Menopause
;
Middle Aged
;
Ovarian Neoplasms/*diagnosis/ultrasonography
;
Predictive Value of Tests
;
Prospective Studies
;
Proteins/*analysis
;
ROC Curve
;
Risk Assessment/methods
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
8.TGCS's Annual Meeting, August 10-12, 2012.
Duangmani THANAPPRAPASR ; Sarikapan WILAILAK
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2012;23(4):215-216
No abstract available.
9.TGCS's Annual Meeting, August 10-12, 2012.
Duangmani THANAPPRAPASR ; Sarikapan WILAILAK
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2012;23(4):215-216
No abstract available.
10.Quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors compared to healthy check-up women.
Sarikapan WILAILAK ; Arb aroon LERTKHACHONSUK ; Nawaporn LOHACHAROENVANICH ; Suteera Chukkul LUENGSUKCHAROEN ; Manmana JIRAJARAS ; Puchong LIKITANASOMBAT ; Suwannee SIRILERTTRAKUL
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2011;22(2):103-109
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare quality of life of disease-free patients after therapy for gynecologic malignancies at follow-up in comparison with healthy check-up patients. Our second objective was to assess correlation between demographic data, disease and treatment factors and quality of life scores. METHODS: Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) quality of life questionnaire at least 6 months after treatment for a gynecologic malignancy. Responses were compared to unmatched healthy women who were seen for standard gynecologic screening examinations. Statistical calculation was done using chi-squared tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis and Spearman rank correlations. Factors associated with FACT-G scores were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Eight hundred and seventy patients were recruited. The median time since therapy was 61 months (range, 6 to 173 months). The overall FACT-G scores were higher in the patient group than in the healthy group (p<0.05). The scores of each subscale measuring physical, functional, social/family and emotional well-being were also higher in the patient group (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed correlation between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, educational level, care giver, presence of economic problems and FACT-G scores. CONCLUSION: The quality of life scores were higher in gynecologic cancer patients after treatment. And the factors that associated with the higher score in the patient group are having husband as a caregiver, no financial problem, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score 0 or 1 and having high school or higher education.
Caregivers
;
Educational Status
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Mass Screening
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Quality of Life
;
Spouses
;
Survivors
;
Surveys and Questionnaires

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail