Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are among the most serious and common complications of diabetes mellitus. They significantly affect patients’ quality of life and impose a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. In Korea, the prevalence of diabetes and related complications, such as DFUs, has been increasing, reflecting a broader global trend. DFUs are associated with severe complications, including infections, neuropathy, and peripheral arterial disease, often leading to amputation. In Korea, diabetic foot complications are a major cause of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations, with high mortality rates following amputation. DFUs also significantly reduce patients’ quality of life and increase healthcare costs. The management of DFUs requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates medical, surgical, and advanced therapeutic interventions to prevent severe outcomes, such as amputation. This comprehensive review of DFU management in patients with diabetes was developed in collaboration with the Diabetic Study Group of the Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society for Diabetic Foot. This review examines the epidemiology, clinical significance, diagnosis, and evidence-based treatment of DFUs.

Health conversations with artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are rapidly increasing; 17% of US adults consult AI chatbots about health monthly, and the figure reaches 25% among those under 30. In Korea, generative AI use reached 33.3% in 2024, nearly doubling from the previous year. Yet academic discourse has largely focused on information accuracy and patient safety. I propose reframing AI health conversations as a potential mediator of health behavior change. Drawing on systematic reviews showing that AI chatbots can support physical activity and smoking cessation, I connect these findings to the transtheoretical model processes of change and the health belief model construct of self-efficacy. I describe the “information-to-action question shift” as a mechanism that may drive the transition from contemplation to action, and discuss intersections with Korea’s Fifth National Health Plan (HP2030) health literacy goals.

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice is accelerating. Many physicians perceive effective AI use as requiring unfamiliar technical skills. This paper reexamines that assumption and proposes a reinterpretation of physicians' existing competencies for AI collaboration.Current concepts: Recent AI discourse has moved from prompt engineering toward the broader practice of context engineering. These concepts are not mutually exclusive: prompt engineering may be understood as one component of context engineering, which involves the deliberate collection, structuring, and integration of contextual information to improve AI output quality. In 2025, Gartner identified context engineering as a core AI competency. A 2026 Nature Medicine paper proposed context engineering as an emerging physician role across four axes: data, task, tool, and norm contexts. Whereas that paper framed this as a competency to develop, this paper argues that physicians have already been trained in all four axes. History taking structures subjective context; physical examination generates primary data inaccessible to AI; clinical reasoning defines task context; and guideline adherence with patient preferences constitutes norm context. Furthermore, patients increasingly bring AI-generated health conversation logs—a novel semi-structured context—to clinical encounters, expanding physicians’ context engineering scope with clinical and medicolegal implications.Discussion and conclusion: The challenge is less acquiring a novel technical skill than reframing existing competencies and adopting tools capable of handling rich clinical context. Future research should examine which forms of physician-supplied context most improve AI-assisted decisions and how patient-generated AI logs should be incorporated into clinical documentation.

Purpose: Pancreas transplantation (PT) is a definitive treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM), restoring endogenous insulin secretion and improving glycemic control. Despite its efficacy, PT is less common in South Korea compared to Western nations. This study aims to report the clinical outcomes of PT over 2 decades at a single center, focusing on surgical techniques, complications, and graft survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 69 PT recipients at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2023 was conducted. Data on recipient and donor demographics, surgical details, immunosuppressive regimens, and graft outcomes were collected. Graft survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, with subgroup comparisons using the log-rank test. Graft failure was defined as graft removal, PT re-registration, insulin dependence exceeding 0.5 units/kg/day for more than 90 days, or patient death. Results: Among the 69 recipients, 50 (72.5%) had type 1 DM, and 18 (26.1%) had type 2 DM. Simultaneous pancreaskidney (SPK) transplantations comprised 84.1% (n = 58), and pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplantations accounted for 10.1%. The 1-year and 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival rates were 92.7% and 89.6%, respectively, with no significant difference between SPK and PAK (P = 0.330). Graft failure occurred in 10 patients, primarily due to pancreatitis and rejection. Donor-related factors, particularly anoxic brain injury, were significantly associated with lower graft survival (P = 0.045). Conclusion PT outcomes in this cohort align with international standards, emphasizing the importance of donor selection and tailored immunosuppression. Expanding PT indications to include selective type 2 DM patients could benefit South Korea’s PT programs with adequate resource allocation.

Purpose: Pancreas transplantation (PT) is a definitive treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM), restoring endogenous insulin secretion and improving glycemic control. Despite its efficacy, PT is less common in South Korea compared to Western nations. This study aims to report the clinical outcomes of PT over 2 decades at a single center, focusing on surgical techniques, complications, and graft survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 69 PT recipients at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2023 was conducted. Data on recipient and donor demographics, surgical details, immunosuppressive regimens, and graft outcomes were collected. Graft survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, with subgroup comparisons using the log-rank test. Graft failure was defined as graft removal, PT re-registration, insulin dependence exceeding 0.5 units/kg/day for more than 90 days, or patient death. Results: Among the 69 recipients, 50 (72.5%) had type 1 DM, and 18 (26.1%) had type 2 DM. Simultaneous pancreaskidney (SPK) transplantations comprised 84.1% (n = 58), and pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplantations accounted for 10.1%. The 1-year and 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival rates were 92.7% and 89.6%, respectively, with no significant difference between SPK and PAK (P = 0.330). Graft failure occurred in 10 patients, primarily due to pancreatitis and rejection. Donor-related factors, particularly anoxic brain injury, were significantly associated with lower graft survival (P = 0.045). Conclusion PT outcomes in this cohort align with international standards, emphasizing the importance of donor selection and tailored immunosuppression. Expanding PT indications to include selective type 2 DM patients could benefit South Korea’s PT programs with adequate resource allocation.

Purpose: Pancreas transplantation (PT) is a definitive treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM), restoring endogenous insulin secretion and improving glycemic control. Despite its efficacy, PT is less common in South Korea compared to Western nations. This study aims to report the clinical outcomes of PT over 2 decades at a single center, focusing on surgical techniques, complications, and graft survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 69 PT recipients at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2023 was conducted. Data on recipient and donor demographics, surgical details, immunosuppressive regimens, and graft outcomes were collected. Graft survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, with subgroup comparisons using the log-rank test. Graft failure was defined as graft removal, PT re-registration, insulin dependence exceeding 0.5 units/kg/day for more than 90 days, or patient death. Results: Among the 69 recipients, 50 (72.5%) had type 1 DM, and 18 (26.1%) had type 2 DM. Simultaneous pancreaskidney (SPK) transplantations comprised 84.1% (n = 58), and pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplantations accounted for 10.1%. The 1-year and 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival rates were 92.7% and 89.6%, respectively, with no significant difference between SPK and PAK (P = 0.330). Graft failure occurred in 10 patients, primarily due to pancreatitis and rejection. Donor-related factors, particularly anoxic brain injury, were significantly associated with lower graft survival (P = 0.045). Conclusion PT outcomes in this cohort align with international standards, emphasizing the importance of donor selection and tailored immunosuppression. Expanding PT indications to include selective type 2 DM patients could benefit South Korea’s PT programs with adequate resource allocation.

The Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.), first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2008, provides an alternative vascular access option for patients with end-stage kidney disease who have exhausted upper extremity arteriovenous (AV) access. The first HeRO graft procedure was performed in South Korea in December 2023. Herein, we describe HeRO graft application in 2 complex vascular access scenarios: (1) establishing a new access pathway for a catheter-dependent patient with bilateral central venous occlusions and (2) bypassing recurrent central venous stenotic lesions to restore the function of a mature AV fistula. Given the potential risks, including thrombosis or infection, careful preoperative planning and meticulous patient selection are essential for optimizing HeRO graft outcomes. Further research is necessary to evaluate the long-term efficacy and complication profile of this technique.

Purpose: The anatomical distribution, characteristics of lesions, and treatment modalities for peripheral artery disease (PAD) are diverse. Endovascular intervention is popular for symptomatic PAD, for both intermittent claudication (IC) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We aimed to investigate the endovascular devices used by comparing patients with PAD referred for endovascular revascularization with IC and CLTI. Methods: We identified 736 patients with PAD enrolled in the multicenter PAD registry in South Korea from 2019 to 2022. Of these patients, 636 received endovascular treatment at the time of this study. After excluding missing data, we analyzed 506 patients with IC or CLTI. Patients’ characteristics, target lesions, and endovascular device data such as type, length, balloon diameter, and stent, were examined. Procedure outcomes of the aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, and below-the-knee lesions were analyzed. Results: Patients with CLTI were more likely to have diabetes mellitus, below-the-knee interventions, and multilevel PAD than the IC group. Patients with IC had more aortoiliac artery lesions and underwent atherectomies than the CLTI group (63.3% and 61.1% vs. 39.7% and 40.6%, respectively; P < 0.001). In patients with femoropopliteal lesions, those with CLTI were more revascularized with stents than the patients with IC, without significant differences (35.3% vs. 29.1%, P = 0.161). Compared to the IC group, the CLTI patients showed significantly worse rates of primary patency, amputation, and mortality (P = 0.029, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Among Korean patients with PAD, there is a significant difference in baseline and lesion characteristics, endovascular strategies, and short-term follow-up outcomes among those with IC and CLTI.

Major vessel invasion, particularly involving the portal and superior mesenteric veins, poses significant challenges during the radical resection of hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. Oncovascular surgery is essential for curative outcomes, and often requires portomesenteric vein reconstruction. Techniques, such as lateral venorrhaphy, patch repair, end-to-end anastomosis, and interposition grafting, have been employed. Autogenous veins such as the internal jugular, left renal, external iliac, or femoral veins are options, although not always available. Alternatives include great saphenous vein grafts, other autogenous materials, including the parietal peritoneum, bovine patches and allografts. Despite the higher risks of infection and thrombosis, prosthetic grafts are also considered. Ensuring long-term patency through meticulous surgical techniques is crucial for preventing complications, such as thrombosis and variceal bleeding.