Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.

Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.

Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.

Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.

Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.

Objective: Traumatic occult pneumothorax is defined as a pneumothorax that cannot be identified with a simple chest X-ray and can be detected only by chest computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively recognize the difference between thoracostomy and conservative treatment of traumatic occult pneumothorax. Methods: Among the thoracic trauma inpatients who visited a single emergency room (ER) from January 2021 to May 2022, adult patients aged over 18 years, diagnosed with traumatic pneumothorax who survived their ER stay and with abnormalities were included as the final study subjects and their histories were compared. Results: Of the total of 269 thoracic trauma patients, 110 were diagnosed with traumatic pneumothorax, of which 30 were traumatic occult pneumothorax patients. Multiple logistic regression analyses performed in the traumatic occult pneumothorax patient group showed that as the pneumothorax size increased, the probability of finding an occult pneumothorax decreased (odds ratio [OR]=0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98). In very severe cases of rib fractures (OR=0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.98), the probability of detecting occult pneumothorax was reduced. Among the patients with traumatic occult pneumothorax, 15 patients underwent thoracostomy. Cases of hemothorax (70%; P=0.05), surgery (26.67%; P<0.01), and higher injury severity scores (12.87±7.69; P=0.02) were more common in the thoracostomy group. Conclusion Usually traumatic occult pneumothorax is treated conservatively with regular follow-up, but thoracostomy is necessary when it is accompanied by hemothorax and for patients requiring surgery and having a higher injury severity score.

Objective: Traumatic occult pneumothorax is defined as a pneumothorax that cannot be identified with a simple chest X-ray and can be detected only by chest computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively recognize the difference between thoracostomy and conservative treatment of traumatic occult pneumothorax. Methods: Among the thoracic trauma inpatients who visited a single emergency room (ER) from January 2021 to May 2022, adult patients aged over 18 years, diagnosed with traumatic pneumothorax who survived their ER stay and with abnormalities were included as the final study subjects and their histories were compared. Results: Of the total of 269 thoracic trauma patients, 110 were diagnosed with traumatic pneumothorax, of which 30 were traumatic occult pneumothorax patients. Multiple logistic regression analyses performed in the traumatic occult pneumothorax patient group showed that as the pneumothorax size increased, the probability of finding an occult pneumothorax decreased (odds ratio [OR]=0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98). In very severe cases of rib fractures (OR=0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.98), the probability of detecting occult pneumothorax was reduced. Among the patients with traumatic occult pneumothorax, 15 patients underwent thoracostomy. Cases of hemothorax (70%; P=0.05), surgery (26.67%; P<0.01), and higher injury severity scores (12.87±7.69; P=0.02) were more common in the thoracostomy group. Conclusion Usually traumatic occult pneumothorax is treated conservatively with regular follow-up, but thoracostomy is necessary when it is accompanied by hemothorax and for patients requiring surgery and having a higher injury severity score.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.