Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the differences in biomechanical function and energy absorption of the lower extremity in the sagittal plane when single leg drop landing between groups with flat foot and normal foot. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy men in their 20s were classified into 13 with flat foot and 15 with normal foot through evaluation of navicular drop test. Using a motion analysis system, loading rate (N/sec), peak vertical ground reaction force (N/body weight [BW]), sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle joint range of motion (°), peak moment (Nm/BW), peak joint power (W/BW) and peak joint work (J/BW) were calculated and analyzed during single leg drop landing. Results: During single leg drop landing, the flat foot and normal foot groups showed no significant differences in loading rate, peak vertical ground reaction force, hip and knee joint range of motion, peak knee and ankle joint moment, peak joint power, and peak joint work (p＞ 0.05). However, the flat foot group showed greater ankle range of motion and peak hip joint flexion moment compared to the normal foot group (p=0.040 and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion The flat foot group shows sagittal plane landing mechanics that are different from the normal foot group during single leg drop landing and appears to try to distribute shock by relying on the distal joint compared to the normal foot group.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the differences in biomechanical function and energy absorption of the lower extremity in the sagittal plane when single leg drop landing between groups with flat foot and normal foot. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy men in their 20s were classified into 13 with flat foot and 15 with normal foot through evaluation of navicular drop test. Using a motion analysis system, loading rate (N/sec), peak vertical ground reaction force (N/body weight [BW]), sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle joint range of motion (°), peak moment (Nm/BW), peak joint power (W/BW) and peak joint work (J/BW) were calculated and analyzed during single leg drop landing. Results: During single leg drop landing, the flat foot and normal foot groups showed no significant differences in loading rate, peak vertical ground reaction force, hip and knee joint range of motion, peak knee and ankle joint moment, peak joint power, and peak joint work (p＞ 0.05). However, the flat foot group showed greater ankle range of motion and peak hip joint flexion moment compared to the normal foot group (p=0.040 and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion The flat foot group shows sagittal plane landing mechanics that are different from the normal foot group during single leg drop landing and appears to try to distribute shock by relying on the distal joint compared to the normal foot group.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the differences in biomechanical function and energy absorption of the lower extremity in the sagittal plane when single leg drop landing between groups with flat foot and normal foot. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy men in their 20s were classified into 13 with flat foot and 15 with normal foot through evaluation of navicular drop test. Using a motion analysis system, loading rate (N/sec), peak vertical ground reaction force (N/body weight [BW]), sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle joint range of motion (°), peak moment (Nm/BW), peak joint power (W/BW) and peak joint work (J/BW) were calculated and analyzed during single leg drop landing. Results: During single leg drop landing, the flat foot and normal foot groups showed no significant differences in loading rate, peak vertical ground reaction force, hip and knee joint range of motion, peak knee and ankle joint moment, peak joint power, and peak joint work (p＞ 0.05). However, the flat foot group showed greater ankle range of motion and peak hip joint flexion moment compared to the normal foot group (p=0.040 and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion The flat foot group shows sagittal plane landing mechanics that are different from the normal foot group during single leg drop landing and appears to try to distribute shock by relying on the distal joint compared to the normal foot group.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the differences in biomechanical function and energy absorption of the lower extremity in the sagittal plane when single leg drop landing between groups with flat foot and normal foot. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy men in their 20s were classified into 13 with flat foot and 15 with normal foot through evaluation of navicular drop test. Using a motion analysis system, loading rate (N/sec), peak vertical ground reaction force (N/body weight [BW]), sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle joint range of motion (°), peak moment (Nm/BW), peak joint power (W/BW) and peak joint work (J/BW) were calculated and analyzed during single leg drop landing. Results: During single leg drop landing, the flat foot and normal foot groups showed no significant differences in loading rate, peak vertical ground reaction force, hip and knee joint range of motion, peak knee and ankle joint moment, peak joint power, and peak joint work (p＞ 0.05). However, the flat foot group showed greater ankle range of motion and peak hip joint flexion moment compared to the normal foot group (p=0.040 and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion The flat foot group shows sagittal plane landing mechanics that are different from the normal foot group during single leg drop landing and appears to try to distribute shock by relying on the distal joint compared to the normal foot group.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the differences in biomechanical function and energy absorption of the lower extremity in the sagittal plane when single leg drop landing between groups with flat foot and normal foot. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy men in their 20s were classified into 13 with flat foot and 15 with normal foot through evaluation of navicular drop test. Using a motion analysis system, loading rate (N/sec), peak vertical ground reaction force (N/body weight [BW]), sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle joint range of motion (°), peak moment (Nm/BW), peak joint power (W/BW) and peak joint work (J/BW) were calculated and analyzed during single leg drop landing. Results: During single leg drop landing, the flat foot and normal foot groups showed no significant differences in loading rate, peak vertical ground reaction force, hip and knee joint range of motion, peak knee and ankle joint moment, peak joint power, and peak joint work (p＞ 0.05). However, the flat foot group showed greater ankle range of motion and peak hip joint flexion moment compared to the normal foot group (p=0.040 and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion The flat foot group shows sagittal plane landing mechanics that are different from the normal foot group during single leg drop landing and appears to try to distribute shock by relying on the distal joint compared to the normal foot group.

PURPOSE: Measurement of the root surface area (RSA) is important in periodontal treatment and for the evaluation of periodontal disease as a risk factor for systemic disease. The aim of this study was to measure the RSA at 6 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) using the Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). METHODS: We obtained cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data from 33 patients who had visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of Dankook University Dental Hospital. The patients comprised 17 men and 16 women aged from 20 to 35 years, with a mean age of 24.4 years. Only morphologically intact teeth were included in our data. Because the third molars of the maxilla and mandible have a high deformation rate and were absent in some participants, they were not included in our research material. RESULTS: The CBCT data were reconstructed into 3-dimensional (3D) teeth models using the Mimics software, and the RSA at 6 mm below the CEJ was separated and measured using 3-Matic (Materialise). In total, 924 3D teeth models were created, and the area at 6 mm below the CEJ could be isolated in all the models. The area at 6 mm below the CEJ was measured in all teeth from the 33 patients and compared based on sex and position (maxilla vs. mandible). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that it was feasible to generate 3D data and to evaluate RSA values using CBCT and the Mimics software. These results provide deeper insights into the relationship between periodontal inflammatory burden and systemic diseases.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Molar, Third ; Periodontal Diseases ; Risk Factors ; Tooth ; Tooth Cervix

PURPOSE: To assess changes in ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness after cataract surgery using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Forty-three eyes of 33 patients, who underwent cataract surgery were imaged with spectral-domain OCT before and after surgery to measure peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and GCIPL thickness, signal strength (SS), quadrant, 12 clock-hour RNFL thickness and sectoral GCIPL thickness. RESULTS: The postoperative SS, RNFL and GCIPL thickness were higher than before surgery (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that endothelial cell count and preoperative SS were significantly correlated with SS changes in RNFL parameters and preoperative SS was significantly correlated with SS changes in GCIPL parameters. Univariate analysis indicated that age was significantly correlated with RNFL thickness changes in RNFL parameters and no factor was correlated with GCIPL thickness in GCIPL parameters (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cataracts may decrease peripapillary RNFL and GCIPL thickness measurements and SS on OCT scans. Peripapillary RNFL and GCIPL thickness measurements should be interpreted with caution in eyes with significant cataracts.
Cataract* ; Endothelial Cells ; Ganglion Cysts* ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nerve Fibers ; Retinaldehyde ; Tomography, Optical Coherence*

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) type 1A (CMT1A) is the demyelinating form of CMT that is significantly associated with PMP22 duplication. Some studies have found that the disease-related disabilities of these patients are correlated with their compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs), while others have suggested that they are related to the nerve conduction velocities. In the present study, we investigated the correlations between the disease-related disabilities and the electrophysiological values in a large cohort of Korean CMT1A patients. METHODS: We analyzed 167 CMT1A patients of Korean origin with PMP22 duplication using clinical and electrophysiological assessments, including the CMT neuropathy score and the functional disability scale. RESULTS: Clinical motor disabilities were significantly correlated with the CMAPs but not the motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCVs). Moreover, the observed sensory impairments matched the corresponding reductions in the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) but not with slowing of the sensory nerve conduction velocities (SNCVs). In addition, CMAPs were strongly correlated with the disease duration but not with the age at onset. The terminal latency index did not differ between CMT1A patients and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: In CMT1A patients, disease-related disabilities such as muscle wasting and sensory impairment were strongly correlated with CMAPs and SNAPs but not with the MNCVs or SNCVs. Therefore, we suggest that the clinical disabilities of CMT patients are determined by the extent of axonal dysfunction.
Action Potentials ; Axons ; Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease ; Cohort Studies ; Humans ; Muscles ; Neural Conduction

The publisher wishes to apologize for incorrectly displaying the author (Seok Beom Gwon) name. We correct his name from Seok Beom Gwon to Seok Beom Kwon.

BACKGROUND: Connexin 43-mediated gap junctional communication plays an important role in atherosclerosis. Numerous studies have demonstrated a correlation between mitral valve annular calcification and atherosclerotic disease. However, the relevance of connexin 43 to mitral valve disease remains unclear. We hypothesized that the mechanism contributing to mitral valve disease is associated with alterations in cell-to-cell communication mediated by changes in Connexin 43 expression. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty male New Zealand rabbits were divided into two groups: animals in group 1 (n=10) were fed a normal chow diet, whilst those in group 2 (n=10) received a diet containing 1% cholesterol for 12 weeks. After sacrificing the animals, the mitral valves were excised and analyzed with immunohistochemical staining and Real-time Reverse Transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real time RT-PCR). RESULT: Myofibroblasts and macrophages were found concentrated within the endothelial layer on the ventricular side of the leaflet in the cholesterol diet group. Immunohistochemial staining showed elevated expression of connexin43 in the cholesterol diet group. Real-time RT-PCR revealed increased connexin43 mRNA levels in mitral valves from hypercholesterolemic animals. CONCLUSION: Our finding that connexin43 expression is increased in mitral valves of hypercholesterolemic rabbits suggests that alterations in cell-to-cell communication via connexin43 containing gap junctions play a role in the development of mitral valve disease in hypercholesterolemia.
Animals ; Atherosclerosis ; Cholesterol ; Connexin 43 ; Diet ; Gap Junctions ; Humans ; Hypercholesterolemia ; Macrophages ; Male ; Mitral Valve ; Myofibroblasts ; Rabbits ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RNA, Messenger ; Up-Regulation