Digital and intelligent technologies serve as the core engine driving the inheritance of the essence and the innovation while upholding the fundamentals of traditional Chinese medicine（TCM）. Currently， the digital and intelligent transformation of TCM has undergone four developmental stages， exhibiting inherent characteristics such as long-term inevitability， objective standardization， and ecological evolution. By introducing quantitative metrics， digital and intelligent technologies have achieved breakthroughs in TCM knowledge inheritance and innovation， clinical diagnosis and treatment， and herbal medicine supply. The practical applicability of methodological innovations has been empirically validated， though significant disparities exist in technological adaptability and application depth across different fields. Overall， the digital and intelligent transformation of TCM remains in its nascent stage， grappling with multiple structural challenges：weak data foundations， inadequate technological adaptability， incomplete institutional frameworks， shortages of multidisciplinary talent， lagging policies and regulations， and urban-rural digital divide. In order to foster sustainable development and modernization of TCM， this paper establishes a six-dimensional collaborative governance framework of encompassing data， technology， organization， institutions， environment and ethics， which is rooted in data governance and digital governance theories. Future efforts should center on standardization， integration， and ecosystem development to build a data and technology foundation. Focus should be placed on deepening innovation and application of key TCM-specific technologies， while simultaneously strengthening interdisciplinary talent cultivation， improving institutional mechanisms and policy frameworks， and increasing support for rural areas. By adopting a people-centered and technology-empowered approach， we can overcome developmental constraints and unleash the powerful driving force of digital and intelligent technologies for the inheritance of TCM.

Objective　To evaluate the in vitro synergistic antimicrobial effect of allicin combined with imipenem on clinically isolated carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), providing a reference for further in vivo pharmacodynamic studies. Methods Twenty-two strains of CRKP were selected as experimental subjects based on clinical drug sensitivity results. Pulling assay together with carbapenem inhibition enhancement assay were leveraged to identify the high adherence and β-lactamase phenotypes of CRKP. The combined effect of allicin and imipenem was confirmed using the zero interaction potency (ZIP) method. The antimicrobial effects of allicin, imipenem, and their combination against CRKP were tested separately in vitro by agar paper diffusion method. The organic combination of allicin and imipenem was exploited for detecting the diameter of the CRKP inhibitory circle and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). The crystal violet semi-quantitative method was utilized to observe the effect of allicin combined with imipenem on CRKP biofilm formation. Results Among the 22 strains of CRKP, 6 strains exhibited high adhesion, accounting for 27.27%. The results of carbapenem inhibition enhancement demonstrated that all strains of CRKP were class A β-lactamase-producing. Allicin had a strong bactericidal effect on CRKP. According to the results of one-way ANOVA, the diameter of the circle of inhibition of allicin combined with imipenem (15.91±2.76)mm was significantly higher than that of the imipenem alone group (8.23±3.46) mm(F=46.39, P<0.001). The ZIP scoring and MIC methods confirmed that the combination of allicin and imipenem primarily exerted an additive effect. One-way ANOVA analysis of crystal violet absorbance values showed that compared to the control group (0.213±0.056), the total CRKP biofilm amount in the allicin combined with imipenem group was reduced (0.134±0.045) (F=3.211, P=0.045). Conclusions The results of bacterial inhibition experiments in vitro show that the combination of allicin and imipenem significantly increases the inhibitory ability of CRKP and inhibits biofilm formation effectively.

Child ; Humans ; Granulomatous Disease, Chronic/complications* ; Pneumonia

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.