Objective To compare the benefits and drawbacks of primary patch expansion versus pericardial tube right ventricular-pulmonary artery connection in patients diagnosed with pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (PA/VSD). Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with PA/VSD who underwent primary right ventricular-pulmonary artery connection surgery at our center between 2010 and 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of right ventricular-pulmonary artery connection: a pericardial tube group and a patch expansion group. Clinical data and imaging findings were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 51 patients were included in the study, comprising 31 males and 20 females, with a median age of 12.57 (4.57, 49.67) months. The pericardial tube group included 19 patients with a median age of 17.17 (7.33, 49.67) months, while the patch expansion group consisted of 32 patients with a median age of 8.58 (3.57, 52.72) months. In both groups, the diameter of pulmonary artery, McGoon index, and Nakata index significantly increased after treatment (P<0.001). However, the pericardial tube group exhibited a longer extracorporeal circulation time (P<0.001). The reoperation rate was notably high, with 74.51% of patients requiring further surgical intervention, including 26 (81.25%) patients in the patch expansion group and 12 (63.16%) patients in the pericardial tube group. No statistical differences were observed in long-term cure rates or mortality between the two groups (P＞0.005). Conclusion In patients with PA/VSD, both patch expansion and pericardial tube right ventricular-pulmonary artery connection serve as effective initial palliative treatment strategies that promote pulmonary vessel development and provide a favorable foundation for subsequent radical operations. However, compared to the pericardial tube approach, the patch expansion technique is simpler to perform and preserves some intrinsic potential for pulmonary artery development, making it the preferred procedure.

[摘 要] 目的：探讨同源框蛋白C4（HOXC4）在胃癌组织和细胞中的表达及其对胃癌细胞增殖、迁移与侵袭的作用及其机制。方法：收集2020年5月至2021年4月期间在南阳市第一人民医院肿瘤科手术切除的16例进展期胃癌患者的癌及癌旁组织标本，以及人胃正常上皮细胞GES-1和胃癌细胞AGS、SGC-790和MGC-803，采用WB法检测胃癌组织和细胞中HOXC4的表达。通过RNA干扰技术对SGC-790及AGS细胞中HOXC4进行敲低或过表达，实验分为sh-HOXC4#1组、sh-HOXC4#2组、sh-Con组、sh-HOXC4 + pc-integrin β1组、pc-HOXC4组、pc-Con组、pc-HOXC4 + pc-integrin β1组。利用EdU、CCK-8、Transwell实验分别检测敲低或过表达HOXC4对各组细胞活力、增殖、侵袭、迁移和integrin β1表达的影响。用敲低HOXC4的胃癌AGS细胞构建荷瘤小鼠模型，观察敲低HOXC4对移植瘤体积及组织中Ki67和integrin β1蛋白表达的影响。结果：胃癌组织和细胞中HOXC4的表达均显著上调（均P < 0.01）。与sh-Con组相比，sh-HOXC4#1组和sh-HOXC4#2组SGC-790及AGS细胞中HOXC4、integrin β1蛋白表达水平，以及细胞的活力、增殖、迁移及侵袭能力均显著降低（均P < 0.01）。与sh-HOXC4组相比，sh-HOXC4 + pc-integrin β1组细胞活力、增殖、迁移及侵袭能力均显著增加（均P < 0.01）；与pc-Con组相比，pc-HOXC4组细胞活力、侵袭及迁移能力均显著增加（均P < 0.01）；与pc-HOXC4组相比，pc-HOXC4 + pc-integrin β1组细胞活力、迁移及侵袭能力均显著降低（均P < 0.01）。与sh-Con组相比，sh-HOXC4#1组和sh-HOXC4#2组小鼠移植瘤生长缓慢、体积变小，组织中Ki67和integrin β1表达均显著降低（均P < 0.01）。结论：HOXC4在胃癌组织与细胞中表达上调，其通过激活integrin β1信号促进胃癌细胞的增殖、迁移与侵袭。

[摘 要] 目的：探索预后营养指数（PNI）在接受诱导化疗联合免疫（化免）序贯放疗的局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌（ESCC）中的疗效预测价值及预后影响。方法: 回顾性分析浙江省肿瘤医院2019年5月至2023年8月期间收治的126例行诱导化免序贯放疗的局部晚期ESCC患者的临床资料。绘制受试者工作特征曲线（ROC曲线），确定患者诱导化免前1周内、放疗前1周内、放疗开始后4 ± 1周的PNI最佳临界值并对患者进行分组。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线，并用Log-Rank法比较组间患者的总生存期（OS）及无进展生存期（PFS），采用Cox回归分析探讨诱导化免序贯放疗的局部晚期ESCC患者的预后影响因素。结果: 共纳入126例局部晚期ESCC患者，男性118例，女性8例，中位年龄65岁（44~78岁）。运用ROC曲线确认的患者诱导化免前、放疗前和放疗中PNI最佳临界值为46.2、48.3和37.9。放疗前PNI ≥ 48.3组中位OS、PFS分别为47.3、28.2个月，放疗前PNI < 48.3组中位OS、PFS分别为18.7、15.2个月（P < 0.01，P < 0.05）。放疗中PNI ≥ 37.9组中位OS未达到，中位PFS为25.7个月，放疗中PNI < 37.9组中位OS、PFS分别为17.0、12.5个月（P < 0.01，P < 0.05）。诱导化免后PNI升高组中位OS未达到，中位PFS为28.4个月；PNI降低组中位OS、PFS分别为20.4、16.0个月（P < 0.01，P < 0.05）。多因素分析显示，放疗中PNI[HR = 2.292，95% CI（1.264,4.159），P < 0.05]、诱导化免后PNI变化[HR = 2.120, 95% CI（1.007, 4.463），P < 0.05]为影响OS因素。结论: 放疗中PNI、诱导化免后PNI变化与患者治疗疗效及预后有一定相关性，可作为预测ESCC化免序贯放疗获益的重要指标。

[摘 要] 目的：探究β-半乳糖苷α-2-6唾液酸转移酶1（ST6GAL1）对结直肠癌（CRC）HCT116细胞糖酵解和迁移、侵袭的作用及可能的分子机制。方法：通过检索GEPIA2数据库，分析ST6GAL1在CRC患者和健康人群中的表达差异；WB法检测ST6GAL1在CRC细胞HCT116、SW480、Caco-2、HT29、LoVo和人正常结肠上皮细胞NCM460细胞中的表达差异；免疫组织化学法分析ST6GAL1在CRC组织和对应癌旁组织中的表达差异。通过慢病毒转染细胞的方法构建稳定敲低或过表达ST6GAL1的HCT116细胞，通过划痕愈合实验检测细胞迁移能力，Transwell实验检测细胞侵袭能力，WB法检测细胞糖酵解相关蛋白、Notch1受体胞内段（Notch1 ICD）以及PI3K/AKT/mTOR通路磷酸化水平，细胞免疫荧光实验观察Notch1 ICD表达水平和进入细胞核情况；加入Notch1受体激动剂Jagged1处理HCT116细胞，通过WB法检测糖酵解相关蛋白、Notch1 ICD表达水平以及PI3K/AKT/mTOR通路磷酸化水平。结果：ST6GAL1在CRC组织和细胞中均表达上调（均P < 0.05）。与对照组和过表达组相比，敲低ST6GAL1导致HCT116细胞内Notch1 ICD表达水平和PI3K/AKT/mTORC1磷酸化水平显著降低，细胞糖酵解相关蛋白表达水平降低，细胞迁移和侵袭能力减弱（均P < 0.05）；过表达ST6GAL1增加了HCT116细胞内Notch1 ICD表达水平并促进其进入细胞核，细胞糖酵解相关蛋白表达水平升高，细胞迁移和侵袭能力增强（均P < 0.05）。结论：ST6GAL1通过活化Notch1受体进而磷酸化激活PI3K/AKT/mTORC1通路，并增强CRC细胞糖酵解水平和迁移、侵袭能力。

BACKGROUND

The Philippines has been significantly affected by the HIV epidemic in the Asia-Pacific region, with a notable increase in new cases over the past decade. Despite efforts to promote HIV testing, access to treatment, and awareness campaigns, progress has been slow, particularly among youths. Tangere, a market research application, conducted surveys during and after the COVID-19 pandemic to assess HIV knowledge among Filipinos.

This study aimed to evaluate changes in HIV awareness among young Filipinos during and after the COVID-19 pandemic using data collected via Tangere’s surveys. Specifically, it sought to analyze demographic characteristics, sources of HIV information, and knowledge regarding HIV transmission, prevention, and stigma.

Tangere collaborated with the investigators to develop a questionnaire assessing HIV knowledge among young Filipinos. Surveys were conducted during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, targeting subscribers aged 18-35 years, primarily from the National Capital Region and Luzon area. Data analysis involved calculating frequencies and percentages to summarize demographic characteristics and HIV knowledge. An Independent-Samples Proportions procedure was used to compare HIV knowledge during and after the pandemic.

The survey revealed that while respondents generally possessed reasonable knowledge about HIV, there were notable changes in the awareness during and after the pandemic. Social media and television were identified as primary sources of HIV information. Knowledge regarding HIV transmission and prevention increased postpandemic, particularly concerning preventive measures such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PREP) and motherto-child transmission (MTCT). However, persistent misconceptions and stigma surrounding HIV remained, indicating the need for continued education and advocacy efforts.

The study underscores the importance of utilizing social media platforms for HIV awareness campaigns, especially among youths who are disproportionately affected by the epidemic. Despite improvements in knowledge, the Philippines has yet to achieve global HIV prevention goals. Continued efforts to enhance awareness, particularly regarding recent advancements in HIV prevention and treatment, are essential for curbing the epidemic and improving public health outcomes nationwide.

BACKGROUND

Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, schools had to switch online. The sudden transition to blended teaching and learning (BTL) poses challenges for students and teachers, especially for health science programs that require hands-on practical experience. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these self-report questionnaires (SRQs) should be established to ensure the accuracy of the results as intended by the SRQ.

This study critically appraised, compared, and summarized the psychometric properties of SRQ evaluating BTL among health science university students. This review determined the SRQ’s reliability, internal consistency, various forms of validity (content, criterion, construct), and responsiveness.

Following a 10-step procedure based on COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of SRQs used by health science university students to evaluate blended teaching and learning. Studies were eligible if they reported psychometric properties of SRQs related to blended learning among university health science students; exclusions included studies focusing on perceptions, attitudes, self-efficacy, and satisfaction, as well as articles such as biographies, editorials, and conference materials. Searches covered multiple electronic databases until April 26, 2023, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE (OVID), PsycInfo, CINAHL, EBSCOHOST, ERIC, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, JSTOR, Acta Medica Philippina, Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development, and HERDIN, managed through Zotero. Two independent reviewers performed database searches, title and abstract screening, and full-text evaluations, with a third reviewer resolving any disputes. The COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist was employed to evaluate included studies on the development and various measurement properties of SRQs. The reviewers assessed SRQ standards, including validity, reliability, internal consistency, measurement error, responsiveness, interpretability, and feasibility. Data extraction and result tabulation were independently completed, with content comparison by two health education experts. This evaluation categorized the SRQs into three quality and validity levels.

The study examined five articles; four were rated as 'doubtful' and one as 'inadequate' in the overall development of SRQ. All four 'doubtful' studies demonstrated questionable content validity when university students were asked about the questionnaire's relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. Only half of these studies achieved an 'adequate' rating for content validity based on expert opinions on relevance and comprehensiveness. All but one study scored from 'very good' to 'adequate' in structural validity. Three out of the four studies scored a very good rating for internal consistency, while one was deemed 'inadequate' in internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and reliability. Three out of four studies scored 'very good' on construct validity, but all overlooked criterion validity and responsiveness. Conducted in various locations, including Australia, Romania, Turkey, and Taiwan, these studies highlighted both common characteristics and limitations in questionnaire development according to the COSMIN guidelines. Four studies were deemed reliable and valid for BTL constructs (Category A); Wu et al. requires further validation (Category B). Study limitations included heterogeneity in populations, settings, and questionnaire versions, potential subjective bias in SRQ content comparison, and the evolving nature of SRQs in blended learning contexts.

The systematic review reports the development and evaluation of SRQs for BTL while identifying gaps in their applicability to health science programs. The Blended Learning Scale (BLS) of Lazar et al. and the Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) of Ballouk et al. showed an ‘adequate' rating for content validity. BLS revealed very good structural validity, internal consistency, and adequate content validation. Although the BLQ lacked Confirmatory Factor Analysis, it yielded valuable constructs for evaluating health sciences students' experiences in BTL. Both tools require improvements on recall period, completion time, interpretability, and feasibility. The review underscores the necessity for cont inuous assessment and enhancement of such instruments in BTL, advocating a rigorous scale development process. Furthermore, it encourages the customization of teaching and learning evaluation tools to suit specific institutional contexts while promoting further validation of these questionnaires across different populations in future research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Filipino farmers face unique occupational challenges that increase the risk of mental health issues, particularly anxiety. This study aims to determine the different personal, environmental, socioeconomic, occupational, and psychosocial factors associated with anxiety symptoms among Filipino farmers in Central Luzon.

Chain referral sampling method was used to recruit participants for the study, who underwent screening based on the eligibility criteria. Eligible participants were then asked about anxiety symptoms using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), while the validated, researcher-constructed Data Collection Tool for Factors Associated with Anxiety Symptoms (DCFAAS) was used to determine the farmers’ exposure to a variety of factors. Microsoft Excel was utilized in computing for frequency and percent distribution of participants, in each factor. Binary logistic regression was used to compute crude and adjusted odds ratio of each factor thru IBM SPSS Statistics®.

Among the 113 eligible farmers enrolled in the study, only 19 (16.8%) experienced anxiety symptoms, with excessive worrying, which was seen among 45 participants (39.8%). The mental health of Filipino farmers was significantly affected by the presence of physical illness (OR = 10.70 [95% CI 1.367, 83.773]) and having relatives affecting work completion (OR = 6.45 [95% CI 1.346, 30.896]). 

Despite the low prevalence of anxiety symptoms in this study, the findings suggest government policies to improve mental health service access to farmers, to integrate psychosocial support into agricultural programs, and to address family-related work pressures. By addressing these factors, it can improve farmer productivity and promote overall well-being, putting emphasis on the mental health of the Filipino farmers.

OBJECTIVES

In response to the need for a simple and fast way of ensuring that generic drugs especially those that contain rifampicin are bioequivalent with reference drugs, this study validated an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method of quantifying rifampicin in human plasma. The study also validated the method's selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and the absence of a carry-over effect adhering to the Philippine Food and Drug Administration guidelines.

Plasma samples were prepared via protein precipitation using methanol containing ascorbic acid. Three microliters (3 uL) of the prepared samples were then analyzed in a Waters Acquity H-Class UPLC® system coupled to a tunable ultraviolet (TUV) detector with an attached UPLC® BEH C-18 column using a developed and optimized method. Briefly, the column temperature was set to 40°C and the sample temperature was set to 10°C. Elution was done using a linear gradient flow of a water-acetonitrile mixture that started with 45% acetonitrile increasing to 60% acetonitrile at 0.5 minutes and back to 45% acetonitrile at 3 minutes and having a constant flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Detection was done at 340 nm. Method validation was performed following the ICH guidelines for Bioanalytical Method Validation, the same guidelines referenced by the ASEAN Guideline for Harmonisation of Standards and the Philippine Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The method had an analysis time of 3 minutes wherein rifampicin eluted at 1.4 minutes while the internal standard, rifapentine (IS) eluted at 1.7 minutes. Since no co-eluting endogenous materials were observed for the rifampicin and the internal standard, the method was confirmed to be selective. Its linearity over the range of 2 ug/mL to 25 ug/mL has been validated where it has a limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values of 0.64 ug/mL and 1.94 ug/mL, respectively. The interday and intraday precision, reported as % coefficient of variance (%CV), and interday and intraday accuracy, reported as %error all within the limits of ±20% for the LLOQ and ±15% for the rest indicating its reliability and reproducibility. Lastly, due to the nature of the injection of the sample into the system, wherein a blank immediately follows the highest concentration standard, the method has been cleared of a carry-over effect.

The study successfully validated a UHPLC method of quantifying rifampicin in human plasma. Due to the sample processing method used and the chromatographic conditions set, the method can prepare and analyze samples in a simple yet fast, sensitive, reliable, and reproducible manner. The method can be applied in bioavailability and bioequivalence studies of rifampicin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The global pandemic caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected millions, with growing evidence of the potential role of ocular tissues in viral transmission. At the time of writing, local data regarding the phenomenon was limited. This study investigated external ocular manifestations in patients with COVID-19 at a referral center in the Philippines, examined correlations between demographics, systemic manifestations, and laboratory results with ocular manifestations, and determined their timing relative to systemic symptoms.

This single-center, descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out from December 8 to 18, 2020 at the adult COVID-19 wards of the Philippine General Hospital involving 72 participants. Data collection involved relevant clinical history taking and performing gross eye examination. The prevalence of ocular manifestations was described with 95% confidence intervals. Correlations between ocular manifestations and quantitative variables were analyzed with point-biserial correlation, and associations with qualitative variables were tested using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.

Among participants, 31.9% presented with ocular manifestations with foreign body sensation as the most prevalent ocular symptom (11.1%) and conjunctival hyperemia as the most prevalent ocular finding (19.4%). The median age of patients with ocular manifestations was 41 years old with a higher prevalence in the male population (73.9%, CI=95%, p=0.001). No significant correlation was observed between presence of external ocular manifestations and the different systemic and ocular co-morbidities as well as with COVID-19 clinical classification. Among those who experienced symptoms, majority (29.2%) of the patients experienced systemic symptoms prior to the onset of ocular symptoms. Ocular complaints may present as the sole manifestation (13.9%). Several laboratory parameters were measured and only temperature and AST levels showed a low positive correlation with the presence of ocular manifestations. 

Ocular manifestations occur in roughly one third of patients with COVID-19 based on this study population. With some individuals presenting with ocular signs or symptoms as the initial and sole manifestation, healthcare practitioners must exercise caution and remain vigilant in managing patients who present as such. At the time of writing, this is the first local study investigating the different external ocular manifestations in patients with COVID-19. There is a need to pursue more robust studies and conduct more local investigations which will guide both ophthalmologists and other practitioners in strengthening existing guidelines regarding precautionary practices, clinical diagnosis, and management of COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies.

We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty.

Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.