OBJECTIVE: To review the application and progress of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technology in the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases, and to provide reference for clinical treatment decisions. METHODS: The literature related to UBE technology in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) at home and abroad was extensively reviewed, and the surgical methods, indications, effectiveness, and safety were analyzed and summarized. RESULTS: UBE technology is effective in the treatment of CSR and CSM, and has the advantages of good surgical field, reducing the injury of the posterior structure of the cervical spine, and protecting the facet joint process, but in general, the indications are relatively narrow, limited to single-segment or adjacent double-segment lesions, and the requirements for the operator are relatively high, and the learning curve is long. CONCLUSION UBE technology can be applied to the treatment of CSR and CSM, but it needs to be carried out by experienced UBE surgeons for specific cases.
Humans ; Cervical Vertebrae/surgery* ; Endoscopy/methods* ; Radiculopathy/surgery* ; Spondylosis/surgery* ; Decompression, Surgical/methods* ; Spinal Cord Diseases/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome

Objective:To investigate the effect of blood glucose control on the imaging severity and clinical symptoms of facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods:A total of 286 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who were diagnosed and treated in the Department of Spinal Surgery of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from December 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into diabetic and non-diabetic groups according to whether T2DM was diagnosed at admission. Age, gender, presence of hypertension, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. The duration of diabetes was recorded. Fasting blood glucose and peak postprandial blood glucose were monitored for 3 consecutive days. Plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin were assessed by blood biochemical results. Diabetic patients were divided into three sub-groups according to fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c): ideal blood glucose control (HbA1c<6.5% and fasting blood glucose<6.1 mmol/L), good (6.5%≤HbA1c≤7.5% or 6.1 mmol/L≤fasting blood glucose≤7.0 mmol/L), and poor (HbA1c>7.5% and fasting blood glucose>7.0 mmol/L). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of low back pain. Pathria grading system was used to assess the severity of FJOA at different levels of the lumbar spine on lumbar CT. Mann-whitney U test was used to compare the difference of FJOA between L 1-S 1 segments in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of diabetes on FJOA. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the difference of FJOA between different segments in diabetic patients among different sub-groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of blood glucose control on FJOA. Results:A total of 121 patients in the diabetic group and 165 patients in the non-diabetic group were included. L 4, 5 FJOA grade 3(2, 3) in diabetic patients was greater than grade 2(1, 3) in non-diabetic patients with significant difference ( Z=-3.179, P=0.001), and diabetes was an independent risk factor for L 4, 5 FJOA [ OR=1.767, 95% CI(1.032, 3.025), P=0.038]. There was no significant difference in age, BMI, sex ratio, prevalence of hypertension and blood glucose fluctuation values among different subgroups of glycemic control in the diabetic group. Patients in the poor glucose group had higher FJOA grades 2(1, 2), 3(3, 3) and 3(2, 4) at L 1, 2, L 4, 5 and L 5S 1 than those in the ideal glucose group at grades 1(1, 2), 2(1.5, 3) and 2(1, 2) with significant differences ( H=9.530, P=0.009; H=18.248, P<0.001; H=27.916, P<0.001). Patients in the poor glucose group had higher grades 3(3, 3) and 3(2, 4) of osteoarthritis of the L 4, 5 and L 5S 1 facet joints than those in the good glucose group, grades 3(2, 3) and 2(1, 2) with significant differences ( H=18.248, P<0.001; H=27.916, P<0.001). Low back pain was positively correlated with poor glycemic control, L 4, 5 and L 5S 1 FJOA ( r=0.512, P<0.001; r=0.383, P<0.001; r=0.484, P<0.001). Poor glycemic control was an independent risk factor for FJOA at L 4, 5 and L 5S 1 [ OR=4.963, 95% CI (1.095, 22.496), P=0.038; OR=6.010, 95% CI(1.061, 34.049), P=0.043]. Conclusion:Compared with non-diabetic patients, patients with type 2 diabetes have a higher risk of osteoarthritis in the facet joints of L 4, 5. Compared with diabetic patients with good or ideal glycemic control. Patients with poor glycemic control had more severe osteoarthritis of the L 4, 5 and L 5S 1 facet joints. Patients with severe facet joint degeneration and poor glycemic control often suffered more from severe low back pain.

Methods: The study included patients who underwent LIF. The demographic characteristics and radiographic and surgical data were collected and evaluated. The included patients were divided into control group and FJOA group based on the preoperative adjacent facet joint Pathria grade. Preoperative and last follow-up LBP Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, leg pain (LP) VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and RASD were evaluated and compared. The improvement rates in VAS and ODI were calculated and compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of LBP relief and incidence of RASD. Results: In total, 197 patients (control group, 86; FJOA group, 111) were included, and the median follow-up was 46 months. The VAS and ODI in both groups significantly improved after surgery. At the last follow-up, the FJOA group had higher VAS and lower VAS improvement rates of LBP than the control group (p<0.05). However, no significant difference in the LP VAS and ODI was found between the two groups. The incidence of RASD in the FJOA group was significantly higher than that in the control group (48.6% vs. 30.2%, p=0.034). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative adjacent FJOA was significantly associated with LBP relief (odds ratio [OR], 0.691; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.498–0.958) and the postoperative incidence of RASD (OR, 1.406; 95% CI, 1.020–1.939). Conclusions The preoperative FJOA in the adjacent segments was significantly associated with LBP following LIF. Patients with preoperative FJOA were more likely to have RASD following lumbar fusion surgery.