1.Lack of Evidence of the Role of APOA5 3’UTR Polymorphisms in Iranian Children and Adolescents with Metabolic Syndrome
Samaneh SALEHI ; Modjtaba EMADI-BAYGI ; Majdaddin REZAEI ; Roya KELISHADI ; Parvaneh NIKPOUR
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2018;42(1):74-81
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a complex and multifactorial disorder characterized by insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, hyperglycemia, abdominal obesity, and elevated blood pressure. The apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) gene variants have been reported to correlate with two major components of MetS, including low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and high levels of triglyceride. In the present study, we explored the associations between five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of APOA5 gene and the MetS risk. METHODS: In a case-control design, 120 Iranian children and adolescents with/without MetS were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-sequencing for these SNPs. Then, we investigated the association of SNPs, individually or in haplotype constructs, with MetS risk. RESULTS: The rs34089864 variant and H1 haplotype (harboring the two major alleles of rs619054 and rs34089864) were associated with HDL-C levels. However, there was no significant association between different haplotypes/individual SNPs and MetS risk. CONCLUSION: These results presented no association of APOA5 3’UTR SNPs with MetS. Further studies, including other polymorphisms, are required to investigate the involvement of APOA5 gene in the genetic susceptibility to MetS in the pediatric age group.
Adolescent
;
Alleles
;
Apolipoproteins
;
Blood Pressure
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Child
;
Cholesterol, HDL
;
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
;
Haplotypes
;
Humans
;
Hyperglycemia
;
Insulin Resistance
;
Obesity, Abdominal
;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
;
Triglycerides
2.A Comparison of the Effects of Silica and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles on Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Poly(ethylene glycol)-Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Chitosan Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Vahideh RAEISDASTEH HOKMABAD ; Soodabeh DAVARAN ; Marziyeh AGHAZADEH ; Effat ALIZADEH ; Roya SALEHI ; Ali RAMAZANI
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2018;15(6):735-750
BACKGROUND: The major challenge of tissue engineering is to develop constructions with suitable properties which would mimic the natural extracellular matrix to induce the proliferation and differentiation of cells. Poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL-PEG-PCL, PCEC), chitosan (CS), nano-silica (n-SiO₂) and nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HA) are biomaterials successfully applied for the preparation of 3D structures appropriate for tissue engineering. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of n-HA and n-SiO₂ incorporated PCEC-CS nanofibers on physical properties and osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope, thermogravimetric analysis, contact angle and mechanical test were applied to evaluate the physicochemical properties of nanofibers. Cell adhesion and proliferation of hDPSCs and their osteoblastic differentiation on nanofibers were assessed using MTT assay, DAPI staining, alizarin red S staining, and QRT-PCR assay. RESULTS: All the samples demonstrated bead-less morphologies with an average diameter in the range of 190–260 nm. The mechanical test studies showed that scaffolds incorporated with n-HA had a higher tensile strength than ones incorporated with n-SiO₂. While the hydrophilicity of n-SiO₂ incorporated PCEC-CS nanofibers was higher than that of samples enriched with n-HA. Cell adhesion and proliferation studies showed that n-HA incorporated nanofibers were slightly superior to n-SiO₂ incorporated ones. Alizarin red S staining and QRT-PCR analysis confirmed the osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs on PCEC-CS nanofibers incorporated with n-HA and n-SiO₂. CONCLUSION: Compared to other groups, PCEC-CS nanofibers incorporated with 15 wt% n-HA were able to support more cell adhesion and differentiation, thus are better candidates for bone tissue engineering applications.
Biocompatible Materials
;
Bone and Bones*
;
Cell Adhesion
;
Chitosan
;
Dental Pulp
;
Durapatite*
;
Extracellular Matrix
;
Humans
;
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
;
Nanofibers
;
Nanoparticles*
;
Osteoblasts
;
Silicon Dioxide*
;
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
;
Stem Cells
;
Tensile Strength
;
Tissue Engineering

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail