OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of difference between hematocrit (HCT) and albumin (Alb) in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the septic patients hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January to October in 2024. Clinical data including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension or diabetes, vital signs on admission, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, blood lactic acid (Lac), oxygenation index (PaO₂/FiO₂), hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), lymphocyte count (LYM), HCT, Alb, difference between HCT and Alb, bilirubin, scrum creatinine (SCr), and fibrinogen (Fib) within 48 hours of admission were collected. The 28-day prognosis of patients was also recorded. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 28-day death in patients with sepsis. The predictive efficacy of the difference between HCT and Alb on 28-day death was evaluated using the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve). RESULTS: Among 180 enrolled septic patients, 140 survived and 40 died on 28 days. Compared with the survival group, the patients in the death group was significantly older (years old: 64±16 vs. 55±15, P < 0.05), and had higher SOFA score, APACHE II score, and SCr [SOFA score: 6 (4, 9) vs. 3 (2, 5), APACHE II score: 13 (10, 18) vs. 8 (6, 11), SCr (μmol/L): 136 (70, 416) vs. 77 (58, 126), all P < 0.05] as well as lower Hb, PLT, HCT, difference between HCT and Alb, and Fib within 48 hours of admission [Hb (g/L): 90±30 vs. 106±79, PLT (×10⁹/L): 158 (57, 240) vs. 215 (110, 315), HCT: 0.258±0.081 vs. 0.333±0.077, difference between HCT and Alb: -6.52±7.40 vs. 1.07±7.63, Fib (g/L): 3.72±1.57 vs. 4.59±1.55, all P < 0.05]. No significant difference in gender, BMI, history of hypertension or diabetes, vital signs on admission, or other laboratory indicators was found between the two groups. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.040, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.004-1.078, P = 0.030], APACHE II score (OR = 1.218, 95%CI was 1.038-1.430, P = 0.016), Hb (OR = 1.040, 95%CI was 1.014-1.068, P = 0.003), and difference between HCT and Alb (OR = 0.804, 95%CI was 0.727-0.889, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 28-day death of septic patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of difference between HCT and Alb for predicting 28-day death of septic patients was 0.764 (95%CI was 0.679-0.849, P < 0.001). A cut-off value of difference between HCT and Alb ≤ -5.35 yielded a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 65.0%. CONCLUSIONS The difference between HCT and Alb at early admission is a valuable predictor of prognosis in septic patients. A difference ≤ -5.35 indicates an increased death risk of septic patients.
Humans ; Prognosis ; Sepsis/blood* ; Retrospective Studies ; Hematocrit ; Serum Albumin/analysis* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; APACHE

Purpose: Mixed-lineage leukemia protein 4 (MLL4/KMT2D) is a histone methyltransferase, and its mutation has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in many cancers, including lung cancer. We investigated the function of MLL4 in lung carcinogenesis. Materials and Methods: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in A549 cells transfected with control siRNA or MLL4 siRNA was performed. Also, we used EdU incorporation assay, colony formation assays, growth curve analysis, transwell invasion assays, immunohistochemical staining, and in vivo bioluminescence assay to investigate the function of MLL4 in lung carcinogenesis. Results: We found that MLL4 expression was downregulated in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues and tended to decrease with disease stage progression. We analyzed the transcriptomes in control and MLL4- deficient cells using high-throughput RNA deep sequencing (RNA-seq) and identified a cohort of target genes, such as SOX2, ATF1, FOXP4, PIK3IP1, SIRT4, TENT5B, and LFNG, some of which are related to proliferation and metastasis. Our results showed that low expression of MLL4 promotes NSCLC cell proliferation and metastasis and is required for the maintenance of NSCLC stem cell properties. Conclusion Our findings identify an important role of MLL4 in lung carcinogenesis through transcriptional regulation of PIK3IP1, affecting the PI3K/AKT/SOX2 axis, and suggest that MLL4 could be a potential prognostic indicator and target for NSCLC therapy.

The work of hospital management and evaluation began in 1991 in Shangtung.Up till 1995,the first phase has basically ended.From the three years of hospital evaluation,we find the prob- lems of superficial understanding of evaluation rules,hasty preparation of materials,etc.To solve the- seproblems,relevant documents must be well studied and hurried work avoided.Key points must be grasped with the guiding principle kept in mind.Defunct ideas must be scrapped with new ideas put into practice.A scientific evaluation is to render the evaluation conclusions authoritative and viable.Super- vision must be tightened.The point for evaluation is quality to.solve the problems of quality control and the monitoring of case history and illness specification.