1.Patient Education to Reduce Anxiety Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy Procedure: A Systematic Review of Interventional Studies
Fathiya Juwita HANUM ; Rizanda MACHMUD ; Soehartati GONDHOWIARDJO ; Daan KHAMBRI ; Wirsma Arif HARAHAP ; Aisyah ELLIYANTI ; Firdawati FIRDAWATI ; Rima SEMIARTY
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2026;59(2):110-122
Objectives:
Nearly 1 in 3 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy experience anxiety, which can negatively affect both quality of life and prognosis. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on patient education and its impact on anxiety levels among cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of the current literature using 3 scientific databases—PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science—to identify intervention studies. Data were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach, integrating findings across studies to draw comprehensive conclusions.
Results:
Fifteen studies involving 1988 participants were included. Baseline anxiety levels, measured using various instruments, ranged from 2.9% to 88.2% before radiotherapy and declined thereafter in both intervention and control groups. Most studies reported no significant difference in anxiety reduction between intervention groups receiving educational programs and control groups receiving standard education. However, interventions that were more intensive and delivered by professional staff were more likely to produce statistically significant reductions in anxiety.
Conclusions
This review suggests that patient education remains relevant for reducing anxiety among cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Routine screening for anxiety prior to radiotherapy is recommended, along with the development of more intensive and tailored educational interventions rather than passive or minimal approaches.
2.HIV-related Perceptions, Knowledge, Professional Ethics, Institutional Support, and HIV/AIDS-related Stigma in Health Services in West Sumatra, Indonesia: An Empirical Evaluation Using PLS-SEM
Vivi TRIANA ; Nursyirwan EFFENDI ; Brian Sri Pra HASTUTI ; Cimi ILMIAWATI ; Dodi DEVIANTO ; Afrizal AFRIZAL ; Adang BACHTIAR ; Rima SEMIARTY ; Raveinal RAVEINAL
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2024;57(5):435-442
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of associations between knowledge, professional ethics, institutional support, perceptions regarding HIV/AIDS, and HIV/AIDS-related stigma among health workers in West Sumatra, Indonesia.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study involving health workers at public hospitals and health centers in West Sumatra in June 2022. The Health Care Provider HIV/AIDS Stigma Scale was employed to assess the stigma associated with HIV/AIDS. To estimate and evaluate the model’s ability to explain the proposed constructs, we utilized the standardized partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM).
Results:
In total, 283 individuals participated in this study (average age, 39 years). The majority were female (91.2%), nearly half were nurses (49.5%), and 59.4% had been working for more than 10 years. The study revealed that HIV/AIDS-related stigma persisted among health workers. The PLS-SEM results indicated that all latent variables had variance inflation factors below 5, confirming that they could be retained in the model. Knowledge and professional ethics significantly contributed to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related stigma, with an effect size (f²) of 0.15 or greater. In contrast, perceived and institutional support had a smaller impact on HIV-related stigma, with an effect size (f²) of at least 0.02. The R 2 value for health worker stigma was 0.408, suggesting that knowledge, professional ethics, institutional support, and perceived support collectively explain 40.8% of the variance in stigma.
Conclusions
Improving health workers’ understanding of HIV, fostering professional ethics, and strengthening institutional support are essential for reducing HIV-related stigma in this population.
3.COVID-19 Vaccination and Clinical Outcomes at a Secondary Referral Hospital During the Delta Variant-dominant Period in West Sumatra, Indonesia
Didan Ariadapa RAHADI ; Elfira YUSRI ; Syandrez Prima PUTRA ; Rima SEMIARTY ; Dian PERTIWI ; Cimi ILMIAWATI
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2023;56(3):221-230
Objectives:
The second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in Indonesia, during which the Delta variant predominated, took place after a vaccination program had been initiated in the country. This study was conducted to assess the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on unfavorable clinical outcomes including hospitalization, severe COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death using a real-world model.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective cohort study involved patients with COVID-19 aged ≥18 years who presented to the COVID-19 emergency room at a secondary referral teaching hospital between June 1, 2021 and August 31, 2021. We used a binary logistic regression model to assess the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on unfavorable clinical outcomes, with age, sex, and comorbidities as confounding variables.
Results:
A total of 716 patients were included, 32.1% of whom were vaccinated. The elderly participants (≥65 years) had the lowest vaccine coverage among age groups. Vaccination had an effectiveness of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25 to 66) for preventing hospitalization, 97% (95% CI, 77 to 99) for preventing severe COVID-19, 95% (95% CI, 56 to 99) for preventing ICU admission, and 90% (95% CI, 22 to 99) for preventing death. Interestingly, patients with type 2 diabetes had a 2-fold to 4-fold elevated risk of unfavorable outcomes.
Conclusions
Among adults, COVID-19 vaccination has a moderate preventive impact on hospitalization but a high preventive impact on severe COVID-19, ICU admission, and death. The authors suggest that relevant parties increase COVID-19 vaccination coverage, especially in the elderly population.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail