1.Ex Vivo T Cell Cytokine Expression Predicts Survival in Patients with Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis
Ashwin D. DHANDA ; Euan YATES ; Lauren P. SCHEWITZ-BOWERS ; Philippa J. LAIT ; Richard W. J. LEE ; Matthew E. CRAMP
Gut and Liver 2020;14(2):265-268
Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is an acute inflammatory liver condition with high early mortality rate. Steroids improve shortterm survival but nonresponders have the worst outcomes.There is a clinical need to identify these high-risk individuals at the time of presentation. T cells are implicated in AH and steroid responsiveness. We measured ex vivo T cell cytokine expression as a candidate biomarker of outcomes in patients with AH. Consecutive patients (bilirubin >80 µmol/L and ratio of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase >1.5 who were heavy alcohol consumers with discriminant function [DF] ≥32), were recruited from University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust. T cells were obtained and stimulated ex vivo. Cytokine expression levels were determined by flow cytometry and protein multiplex analysis. Twenty-three patients were recruited (10 male; median age 51 years; baseline DF 67; 30% 90-day mortality). Compared to T cells from nonsur-vivors at day 90, T cells from survivors had higher baseline baseline intracellular interleukin (IL)-10:IL-17A ratio (0.43 vs 1.20, p=0.02). Multiplex protein analysis identified interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) as independent predictors of 90-day mortality (p=0.04, p=0.01, respectively).The ratio of IFNγ to TNF-α was predictive of 90-day mortality (1.4 vs 0.2, p=0.03). These data demonstrate the potential utility of T cell cytokine release assays performed on pretreatment blood samples as biomarkers of survival in patients with severe AH. Our key findings were that intracellular IL-10:IL-17A and IFNγ:TNF-α in culture supernatants were pre-dictors of 90-day mortality. This offers the promise of devel-oping T cell-based diagnostic tools for risk stratification.
2.Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation.
W Frank PEACOCK ; Deborah DIERCKS ; Robert BIRKHAHN ; Adam J SINGER ; Judd E HOLLANDER ; Richard NOWAK ; Basmah SAFDAR ; Chadwick D MILLER ; Mary PEBERDY ; Francis COUNSELMAN ; Abhinav CHANDRA ; Joshua KOSOWSKY ; James NEUENSCHWANDER ; Jon SCHROCK ; Elizabeth LEE-LEWANDROWSKI ; William ARNOLD ; John NAGURNEY
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2016;36(5):405-412
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Alere Triage Cardio3 Tropinin I (TnI) assay (Alere, Inc., USA) and the PathFast cTnI-II (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Japan) against the central laboratory assay Singulex Erenna TnI assay (Singulex, USA). METHODS: Using the Markers in the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) study population, we evaluated the ability of three different assays to identify patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The MIDAS dataset, described elsewhere, is a prospective multicenter dataset of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a planned objective myocardial perfusion evaluation. Myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed by central adjudication. RESULTS: The C-statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for diagnosing MI by using a common population (n=241) was 0.95 (0.91-0.99), 0.95 (0.91-0.99), and 0.93 (0.89-0.97) for the Triage, Singulex, and PathFast assays, respectively. Of samples with detectable troponin, the absolute values had high Pearson (R(P)) and Spearman (R(S)) correlations and were R(P)=0.94 and R(S)=0.94 for Triage vs Singulex, R(P)=0.93 and R(S)=0.85 for Triage vs PathFast, and R(P)=0.89 and R(S)=0.73 for PathFast vs Singulex. CONCLUSIONS: In a single comparative population of ED patients with suspected ACS, the Triage Cardio3 TnI, PathFast, and Singulex TnI assays provided similar diagnostic performance for MI.
Acute Coronary Syndrome/*diagnosis
;
Biomarkers/analysis
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Humans
;
Laboratories/standards
;
Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis
;
*Point-of-Care Systems
;
Prospective Studies
;
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Troponin I/*analysis

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail