1.Research progress of oral allergy syndrome.
Zhuang Zhuang FAN ; Zhi Yue LU ; Jian Qiu JIN
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2023;57(3):341-347
Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Patients with pollen allergy will experience oropharyngeal allergy after eating fresh fruits or vegetables containing homologous pathogenesis-related allergen, occasionally accompanied by systemic symptoms, it is a special type of food hypersensitivity in which respiratory allergens and food allergens are similar structurally and lead to the cross-reactivity. At present, there is little research and attention to it in China. To master the definition, epidemiological characteristics, pathological mechanism, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of OAS is very important to the prevention and control of OAS. This article reviews the research progress of OAS, providing reference and prevention basis for clinicians to improve the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of OAS.
Humans
;
Pollen
;
Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis*
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy*
;
Allergens
;
Fruit
;
Cross Reactions
2.Expert consensus on diagnosis, treatment and prevention of allergic diseases(Part Ⅲ).
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2022;56(12):1685-1693
As the third part of the expert consensus on allergic diseases, this article includes efficacy evaluation, characteristics of allergic diseases in special populations, social and economic burden, psychological problems and prevention. The efficacy evaluation methods include symptom score, quality of life score and drug score. Allergic diseases of special populations have unique clinical characteristics and need special attention. The social and economic burden of allergic diseases is becoming heavier, which requires more attention. The three-level prevention of pollinosis can be completed through the "five in one" prevention and control strategies such as local vegetation survey, airborne pollen monitoring, epidemiological survey, standardized training of grassroots medical personnel, science popularization and academic lectures, which is more comprehensive and perfect than the "four in one" treatment strategy.
Humans
;
Quality of Life
;
Consensus
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis*
;
Pollen
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Allergens
3.Oral allergy syndrome.
Jeong Hee CHOI ; Chang Youl LEE
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2018;6(2):85-89
Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) is an IgE-mediated allergy caused by cross-reacting antigenic determinants in pollens and various fruits, vegetables, and nuts which are known as the most common food allergy in adults. Cross-reactive antigenic proteins include pathogenesis-related-10 protein, profilin, cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant and lipid transfer protein. The prevalence of OAS has been reported at up to 70% of birch pollen allergy. A nationwide multicenter study in our country has recently reported that the prevalence of OAS in Korea is 41.7% of pollen allergy. Typical symptoms of OAS are tingling, itching sense and edema of lips, mouth, and throat immediately after ingestion of raw fruits, vegetables, or nuts. These can progress to systemic symptoms including anaphylaxis. The diagnosis can be made by typical clinical history in patients with pollen allergy. Skin prick test using fresh fruits extracts can be helpful in confirming sensitization to foods, which has better sensitivity than commercial skin prick test or serum specific IgE test. Treatment of OAS is to avoid causative foods. Self-injectable epinephrine should be considered in the case of anaphylaxis. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to pollens has also been tried.
Adult
;
Anaphylaxis
;
Betula
;
Diagnosis
;
Eating
;
Edema
;
Epinephrine
;
Epitopes
;
Food Hypersensitivity
;
Fruit
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity*
;
Immunoglobulin E
;
Immunotherapy
;
Korea
;
Lip
;
Mouth
;
Nuts
;
Pharynx
;
Pollen
;
Prevalence
;
Profilins
;
Pruritus
;
Rhinitis, Allergic
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
;
Skin
;
Vegetables
4.The Incidence of Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reactions to Apples Among Patients Allergic to Birch Pollen.
Aneta WAGNER ; Hanna ZIELIŃSKA-BLIŹNIEWSKA ; Waldemar WAGNER
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research 2018;10(4):420-424
The major apple allergen Mal d 1 cross-reacts with the homologous birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and causes immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated immediate-type allergic reactions. In some patients, delayed-type hypersensitivity to apples may develop within 72 hours without evidence of specific IgE or a positive skin prick test (SPT). The aim of the study was to evaluate the concomitance of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and immediate IgE-mediated reactions against high- and low-allergenic apple cultivars in patients with birch pollen allergy. Data were obtained from 45 adults with clinical symptoms of birch pollen allergy. Patients were exposed to apple pulp via atopy patch tests (APTs) and SPTs. Levels of IgE specific to Bet v 1 and Mal d 1 were measured with a radioallergosorbent test. Patients allergic to birch pollen showed the highest rate of positive SPT responses to Golden Delicious apples and the lowest rate to low-allergenic cultivar Grey French Reinette. Among these patients, 9% developed delayed hypersensitivity reactions to either Golden Delicious or Grey French Reinette apples; these reactions manifested clinically as erythema with papules (class ++). Fifty percent of APT-positive patients were concomitantly SPT-negative. Here, we show for the first time the clinical relevance of T cell-driven allergic reactions to apples. APTs may reveal type IV sensitization in patients who are negative for the corresponding type I sensitization tests. Thus, utilization of the APT procedure with fresh apple appears to be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of apple allergy and may improve the accuracy of food allergy diagnoses.
Adult
;
Betula*
;
Diagnosis
;
Erythema
;
Food Hypersensitivity
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity*
;
Hypersensitivity, Delayed
;
Immunoglobulin E
;
Immunoglobulins
;
Incidence*
;
Malus*
;
Patch Tests
;
Pollen*
;
Radioallergosorbent Test
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
;
Skin
5.The clinical value of China Savin pollen extract used for skin prick test.
Kai GUAN ; J X ZHOU ; R Q WANG ; J YIN ; L L WANG ; Y X ZHI ; J L SUN ; H LI ; L P WEN ; J Q GU ; R TANG ; Z X WANG ; L S LI ; T XU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2018;32(3):161-166
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of China Savin pollen extract which was used for skin prick test (SPT) in the diagnosis of China Savin pollen allergy. Patients with diagnosis of allergic diseases were collected from Allergy Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. All patients were given SPT with China Savin pollen extract, and the mean wheal diameter (MWD) was measured after 15 minutes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed based on the results of serum specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE). The effectiveness of SPT in the diagnosis of China Savin pollen allergy was evaluated under different diagnostic cutoff values. Adverse events were also recorded to evaluate the safety. A total of 1 029 patients were enrolled in this study without drop out case. There were 1 007 patients in full analysis set (FAS) and 765 patients in per protocol analysis set (PPS). The elimination rate was 25.66%. The area under the ROC curve of FAS is 0.814 (95%: 0.788-0.839); which of PPS is 0.829 (95%: 0.801-0.857). Based on the ROC curve of PPS, the optimal and the 95% specificity diagnostic cutoff values of MWD were 3.25 mm and 4.75 mm respectively. Based on different diagnostic cutoff value (3.00, 3.25 and 4.75 mm), the sensitivities of SPT with China Savin pollen extract were 0.740 0 (95%: 0.701 6-0.778 4), 0.700 (95%: 0.659 8-0.740 2) and 0.532 (95%: 0.488 3-0.575 7) respectively, whereas the specificity was gradually increased in sequence, which was 0.769 8 (95%: 0.719 1-0.820 5), 0.826 4 (95%: 0.780 8-0.872 0) and 0.950 9 (95%: 0.924 9-0.976 9) respectively. There were 7 adverse events observed among 6 patients (rate: 0.583%, 6/1 029). The manifestation was mild. There was no severe adverse event. SPT with China Savin pollen extract is an effective and safe tool for the diagnosis of China Savin pollen allergy. The effectiveness of diagnosis could be improved based on integration of medical history and different diagnostic threshold values of SPT.
Allergens
;
adverse effects
;
China
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin E
;
Pollen
;
adverse effects
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
;
diagnosis
;
Skin Tests
6.An epidemic of thunderstorm asthma in Melbourne 2016: asthma, rhinitis, and other previous allergies
Kanishka B RANGAMUWA ; Alan C YOUNG ; Francis THIEN
Asia Pacific Allergy 2017;7(4):193-198
BACKGROUND: On 21st November 2016, Melbourne experienced an epidemic of ‘thunderstorm asthma.’ Although previously described in the literature, risk factors and natural history remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to follow up those presenting to the 3 Emergency Departments (EDs) in our health service during the epidemic, and assess their history for previous asthma, rhinitis, and allergies. METHODS: ED notes of all respiratory presentations within 48 hours of the thunderstorm event were reviewed and patients with acute asthma included. A standardised questionnaire was devised encompassing asthma diagnosis, undiagnosed asthma symptoms and rhinitis severity. Patients were contacted by phone within 30 days of the event. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four patients were identified overall; 263 patients were contactable and completed a phone or mail questionnaire. The mean age was 32.7 ± 19.2 years (range, 6 months–87 years; 25% < 18 years) with 58% male sex. A previous diagnosis of asthma was present in 42% (n = 111), and there was no previous asthma diagnosis in 58% (n = 152). Of those who had no asthma diagnosis 53% had probable undiagnosed asthma. Overall, rhinitis prevalence was 88%, of which 72% were moderate or severe (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guidelines) and 51% (n = 133) reported a history of grass pollen allergy. CONCLUSION: Our data highlights the importance of atopy and rhinitis as risk factors for epidemic thunderstorm asthma. Better identification of undiagnosed asthma, and implementing treatment of asthma and rhinitis may be important.
Asthma
;
Diagnosis
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Health Services
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Male
;
Natural History
;
Poaceae
;
Postal Service
;
Prevalence
;
Rhinitis
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
;
Risk Factors
7.Component-resolved diagnosis using microarray for diagnosing hypersensitivity to raw fruits in birch pollen sensitized children.
Won Bok CHOI ; Jueng Sup YOU ; Yoon Young YI ; Soo In JEONG ; Joon Sup SONG ; Seong YANG ; Il Tae HWANG ; Ha Baik LEE ; Hey Sung BAEK
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2015;3(3):200-205
PURPOSE: Recently, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) using microarray technology has been introduced to the field of clinical allergy. This study was aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of microarray-based IgE detection for diagnosing clinical raw fruit allergy in birch pollen-sensitized children. METHODS: Thirty-one children with allergic disease who had been sensitized to pollen were studied. A pollen-sensitized patient was defined as having an allergen-specific history with concomitant positive skin-prick tests (SPTs) to natural allergen extracts or positive allergen-specific IgE. All subjects underwent SPTs for pollen and fruit. In all subjects, specific IgE to pollen and fruit were measured by ImmunoCAP. Specific IgE antibodies to allergen components were determined by a customized allergen microarray (ISAC). RESULTS: Thirteen of the 31 patients (41.9%) had a history of fruit hypersensitivity with positive SPTs. Measuring IgE to allergen components by ISAC, all the 13 patients with fruit hypersensitivity were positive to at least one of Mal d 1, Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Act d 8, and Act d 2 compared to 12 of the 13 patients (92.3%) who had at least 1 positive IgE to fruits (apple, peach, and kiwi) using ImmunoCAP. The sensitivity of ISAC microarray was 100.0% for the diagnosis of fruit hypersensitivity, but its specificity was 27.7% (5/18). The sensitivity of ImmunoCAP was 92.3%, and its specificity was 83.3%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of allergen components tested using microarray for the diagnosis of clinical fruit hypersensitivity in children with pollen allergy was high; however, its specificity was low.
Antibodies
;
Betula*
;
Child*
;
Diagnosis*
;
Fruit*
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity*
;
Immunoglobulin E
;
Pollen*
;
Prunus persica
;
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
10.Results of skin prick test in young children with wheezing or allergic diseases.
Rui LUO ; Li-Li ZHONG ; Hong-Ling YI ; Yu-Pin TAN ; Min CHEN ; Yun LI
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2012;14(4):282-284
OBJECTIVETo study the characteristics of allergic reactions to common aeroallergens in young children with wheezing or allergic diseases by examining the results of skin prick test in children under 5 years old.
METHODSA total of 196 children under 5 years old, from a district of Changsha City sampled between September 1 to December 31, 2010, were assigned into two groups according to the presence of wheezing or allergic diseases: allergen screening (n=102) and control (n=94). Skin prick tests were performed on both groups.
RESULTSThe positive rate of skin prick test in the allergen screening group was 61.8% (63/102), and this was significantly higher than in the control group (9.6%, 9/94; P<0.05). In the allergen screening group, the positive rate of skin prick test in children with both recurrent wheezing and allergic rhinitis was significantly higher than in children with wheezing alone (P<0.05). The frequency of wheezing was positively correlated with a positive skin prick test (r=0.91; P<0.05). The positive rate of skin prick test for mites was significantly higher than for other aeroallergens (24.2% vs 3.5%; P<0.05) in the allergen screening group. Skin prick testing of the children for dermatophagoides farinae showed a higher positive rate than for dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (50.0% vs 14.7%; P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONSWheezing in early childhood may be associated with the occurrence of asthma. Skin prick testing contributes to the diagnosis of allergic diseases and assessment of allergic reactions to aeroallergens in children with wheezing.
Asthma ; etiology ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Respiratory Sounds ; diagnosis ; immunology ; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial ; diagnosis ; immunology ; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal ; diagnosis ; immunology ; Skin Tests

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail