2.Assessment of Patient Pain Experience during Intravitreal 27-Gauge Bevacizumab and 30-Gauge Ranibizumab Injection.
Mete GULER ; Burak BILGIN ; Musa CAPKIN ; Ali SIMSEK ; Semsettin BILAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2015;29(3):190-194
PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients <65, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.003). However, for patients > or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage
;
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage
;
Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
*Intravitreal Injections
;
Macular Degeneration/drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Macular Edema/drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pain Measurement
;
Ranibizumab/*administration & dosage
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy/physiopathology
3.Assessment of Patient Pain Experience during Intravitreal 27-Gauge Bevacizumab and 30-Gauge Ranibizumab Injection.
Mete GULER ; Burak BILGIN ; Musa CAPKIN ; Ali SIMSEK ; Semsettin BILAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2015;29(3):190-194
PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients <65, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.003). However, for patients > or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage
;
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage
;
Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
*Intravitreal Injections
;
Macular Degeneration/drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Macular Edema/drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pain Measurement
;
Ranibizumab/*administration & dosage
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy/physiopathology
4.Baseline Predictors of Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Sang Jin KIM ; Young Hee YOON ; Ha Kyoung KIM ; Hee Seong YOON ; Se Woong KANG ; June Gone KIM ; Kyu Hyung PARK ; Young Joon JO ; Dong Hoon LEE
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(4):475-482
This study investigated the baseline predictors of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) at 6 months in patients with treatment-naive branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). This multicenter, interventional case series included 208 BRVO and 123 CRVO patients with follow-up period of 6 months or more. Outcome measures of BCVA (logMAR) included absolute change from baseline and a gain or loss of > or = 0.3 from baseline. Outcome measures of CRT included absolute change from baseline and a measurement of < or = 250 microm or > or = 400 microm at 6 months. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were done to find baseline predictors. For BRVO, younger age, worse baseline BCVA, and shorter duration of symptom were associated with more gain in BCVA. For CRVO, worse baseline BCVA was associated with more gain in BCVA. For CRT outcomes, higher baseline CRT predicted greater decrease at 6 months in both BRVO and CRVO. Younger age and better baseline BCVA were associated with an increased likelihood of measurement of a < or = 250 microm outcome for BRVO and CRVO, respectively. For CRVO, smoking was associated with greater decrease from baseline and decreased likelihood of measurement of a CRT > or = 400 microm at 6 months. In conclusion, several baseline factors including age, symptom duration, and baseline BCVA and CRT are associated with BCVA and CRT outcomes at 6 months, which may help to predict disease course for RVO patients.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retina/*pathology
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/pathology/*physiopathology
;
*Visual Acuity
5.Patient's Self-recognition of Reduced Visual Acuity Due to Recurrence of Macular Edema and Prompt Visitation to the Hospital in Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Seong Hun JEONG ; Jae Hui KIM ; Jong Woo KIM ; Tae Gon LEE ; Chul Gu KIM ; Su Jin YOO ; Mun Jung CHOI
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;28(3):213-219
PURPOSE: To evaluate patients' self-recognition of reduced visual acuity due to recurring macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of patients who were diagnosed with recurring macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion was performed. The proportion of patients who recognized reduced visual acuity due to the recurrence of macular edema and who visited the hospital before the scheduled follow-up date was determined. Parameters including age, sex, diagnosis, visual acuity before recurrence of macular edema, and extent of visual acuity reduction due to recurrence of macular edema were compared in patients who recognized a reduction in visual acuity and those who did not. The proportion of patients who visited the hospital promptly was also determined. RESULTS: Forty eyes of 40 patients were included in the analysis. Sixteen and 24 patients were diagnosed with central retinal vein occlusion and branch retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) recognized reduced visual acuity due to recurring macular edema. These patients were younger (59.2 +/- 7.6 vs. 64.8 +/- 9.4 years, p = 0.046), had better visual acuity before recurrence of macular edema (0.52 +/- 0.48 vs. 1.02 +/- 0.46, p = 0.002), and exhibited a greater reduction in visual acuity after recurrence of macular edema (0.34 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.13, p = 0.003). Only four patients visited the hospital before the scheduled follow-up date, and all of these patients lived relatively close to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: For prompt treatment of recurring macular edema, more intensive education about the self-estimation of visual acuity is necessary, particularly for elderly patients who have relatively poor visual acuity. In addition, a simple and easy way to identify the recurrence of macular edema at the local clinic should be established for patients who live relatively far from the hospital.
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Fundus Oculi
;
Humans
;
Macular Edema/*diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
*Patient Readmission
;
Recurrence
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis/physiopathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tomography, Optical Coherence
;
*Visual Acuity
6.Neovascular Glaucoma Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Combined with Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;27(1):64-67
Branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) rarely cause neovascular glaucoma (NVG). A 58-year-old woman with hypertension and type 2 diabetic mellitus complained of progressive visual loss in her right eye for the previous 3 months. At initial examination, visual acuity was 20 / 63 in the right eye. Angle neovascularization was observed and the intraocular pressure (IOP) was 30 mmHg in her right eye. Fundus examination and fluorescein angiography showed BRAO combined with BRVO. We immediately injected intravitreal and intracameral bevacizumab in her right eye. The next day, we performed scatter photocoagulation in the nonperfusion area. One month later, visual acuity was 20 / 20 in her right eye and the IOP was 17 mmHg with one topical antiglaucoma agent. The neovascularization had regressed completely. We report a case of unilateral NVG which was caused by BRAO with concomitant BRVO and advise close ophthalmic examination of the iris and angle in BRVO with BRAO.
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Fundus Oculi
;
Glaucoma, Neovascular/diagnosis/*etiology/physiopathology
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure
;
Middle Aged
;
Retinal Artery Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis
7.Clinical Progress in Impending Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Dong Hoon LEE ; Seok Joon LEE ; Ie Na YOON
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2010;24(2):83-88
PURPOSE: Impending central retinal vein occlusion is associated with mild or no loss of vision; however, its progress and vision prognosis have not been clearly defined until now. Therefore, we studied the progress and prognoses in patients with impending central retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: For this study, we selected ten subjects who had been diagnosed with impending central retinal vein occlusion, and we retrospectively reviewed their progress and prognoses. RESULTS: The average age of the subjects was 31.0 years (18 to 48 years). Eight patients were male and two were female. The average observational period was 5.5 months. Six out of ten subjects were found to have no underlying systemic disease, four subjects had underlying disease. All ten patients were affected unilaterally. When initially tested, the affected eyes showed an average vision of LogMar 0.30. The final vision test revealed an average of LogMar 0.04, which indicates good progress and prognosis. In one patient, retinal hemorrhage and macular edema progressively worsened after the diagnosis, and the patient was treated with radial optic neurotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The cases of impending central retinal vein occlusion that we observed seemed to primarily affect young patients with generally good prognoses. However, in some cases, the degrees of obstruction and hemorrhage increased as time progressed. This suggests that impending central retinal vein occlusion could develop into the prodromal phase of an acute attack.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Disease Progression
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prognosis
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/*physiopathology
;
Retrospective Studies
8.Progression of Impending Central Retinal Vein Occlusion to the Ischemic Variant Following Intravitreal Bevacizumab.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2010;24(3):179-181
A 60-year-old woman who had experienced two episodes of amaurosis fugax in her right eye presented with vision loss. Two weeks earlier, at a private clinic, she was diagnosed with impending central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) of the right eye and received an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Two weeks after this injection she was diagnosed with ischemic CRVO. At 11-weeks post-presentation, extremely ischemic features were observed with fluorescein angiographic findings of severe vascular attenuation and extensive retinal capillary obliteration. At 22-weeks post-presentation she was diagnosed with neovascular glaucoma; she experienced no visual improvement over the following several months.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/*administration & dosage
;
Disease Progression
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Glaucoma, Neovascular/complications
;
Humans
;
Injections, Intraocular
;
Ischemia/diagnosis/*etiology/physiopathology
;
Middle Aged
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/*drug therapy/physiopathology
;
*Retinal Vessels
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
;
Visual Acuity/drug effects
;
Vitreous Body
9.Long-term Visual Outcome of Arteriovenous Adventitial Sheathotomy on Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Induced Macular Edema.
In Kyung OH ; Sungwoo KIM ; Jaeryung OH ; Kuhl HUH
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;22(1):1-5
PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term visual outcome of arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy in BRVO-induced macular edema. METHODS: The visual outcomes of 8 patients following vitrectomy with arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for BVO-induced macular edema (surgery group) were retrospectively evaluated. The three-year post-operative visual acuity of the surgery group was compared with that of the conservatively managed controls. RESULTS: All patients were followed for a minimum of 36 months. Mean BCVA (logMAR) in the surgery group changed from 1.10+/-0.34 to 1.19+/-0.70 and to 0.80+/-0.36 at 12 and 36 months, respectively (p=0.959 at 12 months, p=0.018 at 36 months). In the control group, visual acuity improved from 1.15+/-0.43 to 0.43+/-0.44 and to 0.43+/-0.39 at 12 and 36 months, respectively (p=0.015 at 12 months, at p=0.003 at 36 months). A strong trend toward better visual acuity at 12 months and final examination was observed for controls. (surgery vs. control group, p=0.052 at 12 months, p=0.066 at 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the favorable natural course of BVO and the unproven effect of reperfusion on macular edema, surgical efficacy of arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy requires further evaluation.
Aged
;
Connective Tissue/*surgery
;
Decompression, Surgical/methods
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Macular Edema/etiology/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retinal Artery
;
Retinal Vein
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Visual Acuity/*physiology
;
Vitrectomy/*methods
10.Disc Hemorrhages in Patients with both Normal Tension Glaucoma and Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in Different Eyes.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;21(4):222-227
PURPOSE: To document the clinical features of disc hemorrhage in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and to evaluate the relationship between BRVO and NTG with disc hemorrhages. METHODS: From July 2001 to May 2006, sixteen patients with both NTG and BRVO in different eyes were successively collected from outpatient population of Seoul National University Hospital in this observational case series. The frequency and location of disc hemorrhages, history of associated systemic diseases, and the order of the time of diagnosis between NTG and BRVO were studied. RESULTS: All patients had unilateral BRVO, and their mean age was 63.3+/-10.6 years. Disc hemorrhages were detected in eight patients (50%) during the mean follow-up of 26.8 months (range, 3-96 months). Six patients (75%) had disc hemorrhages in the non-BRVO eyes and two patients (25%) in BRVO eyes. Five hemorrhages (62.5%) were located at inferior-temporal quadrant of the optic disc. History of systemic hypertension was identified in 12 patients (75.0%). In 11 patients (68.8%), NTG was diagnosed at the same time as BRVO. CONCLUSIONS: A higher frequency of disc hemorrhages was identified in patients with both BRVO and NTG. Therefore, some cases of NTG, especially with disc hemorrhages, may share a common vascular pathophysiology with BRVO.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Eye Hemorrhage/*etiology/pathology/physiopathology
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Fundus Oculi
;
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*complications/pathology/physiopathology
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Optic Disk/*pathology
;
Optic Nerve Diseases/*etiology/pathology/physiopathology
;
Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/pathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Severity of Illness Index
;
Visual Acuity

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail