1.Evaluating the effect of montelukast tablets on respiratory complications in patients following blunt chest wall trauma: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
Soleyman HEYDARI ; Hadi KHOSHMOHABAT ; Ali Taheri AKERDI ; Fathollah AHMADPOUR ; Shahram PAYDAR
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2023;26(2):116-120
PURPOSE:
Patients with multiple traumas are at high risk of developing respiratory complications, including pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Many pulmonary complications are associated with systemic inflammation and pulmonary neutrophilic infiltration. Leukotriene-receptor antagonists are anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant drugs subsiding airway inflammation. The present study investigates the effectiveness of montelukast in reducing pulmonary complications among trauma patients.
METHODS:
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial was conducted in patients with multiple blunt traumas and evidence of lung contusion detected via CT scan. We excluded patients if they met at least one of the following conditions: < 16 years old, history of cardiopulmonary diseases or positive history of montelukast-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Patients were allocated to the treatment (10 mg of montelukast) or placebo group using permuted block randomization method. The primary measured outcome was the volume of pulmonary contusion at the end of the trial. The secondary outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, ventilation days, multi-organ failure, and the in-hospital mortality rate.
RESULTS:
In total, 65 eligible patients (treatment = 31, placebo = 34) were included for the final analysis. The treatment group had more pulmonary contusion volume (mean (SD), mm3) at the right (68726.97 (93656.54) vs. 59730.27 (76551.74)) and the left side (67501.71 (91514.04) vs. 46502.21 (80604.21)), higher initial C-reactive peptide level (12.16 (10.58) vs. 10.85 (17.87)) compared to the placebo group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). At the end of the study, the mean (SD) of pulmonary contusion volume (mm3) (right side = 116748.74 (361705.12), left side = 64522.03 (117266.17)) of the treatment group were comparable to that of the placebo group (right side = 40051.26 (64081.56), left side = 25929.12 (47417.13), p = 0.228 and 0.082, respectively). Moreover, both groups have statistically similar hospital (mean (SD), days) (10.87 (9.83) vs. 13.05 (10.12)) and intensive care unit length of stays (mean (SD), days) (7.16 (8.15) vs. 7.82 (7.48)). Of note, the frequency of the in-hospital complications (treatment vs. control group) including acute respiratory distress syndrome (12.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.71), pneumonia (19.4% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.85), multi-organ failure (12.9% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.58) and the mortality rate (22.6% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.41) were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSION
Administrating montelukast has no preventive or therapeutic effects on lung contusion or its complications.
Humans
;
Adolescent
;
Thoracic Wall
;
Pneumonia
;
Wounds, Nonpenetrating
;
Thoracic Injuries/drug therapy*
;
Lung Injury
;
Contusions
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology*
;
Inflammation
;
Tablets
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Progression in the application of machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Weijun ZHANG ; Jianxiao CHEN ; Yuan GAO
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2023;35(6):662-664
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome defined by acute onset of hypoxemia and bilateral pulmonary opacities not fully explained by cardiac failure or volume overload. At present, there is no specific drug treatment for ARDS, and the mortality rate is high. The reason may be that ARDS has rapid onset, rapid progression, complex etiology, and great heterogeneity of clinical manifestations and treatment. Compared with traditional data analysis, machine learning algorithms can automatically analyze and obtain rules from complex data and interpret them to assist clinical decision making. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the machine learning progression in ARDS clinical phenotype, onset prediction, prognosis stratification, and interpretable machine learning in recent years, in order to provide reference for clinical.
Humans
;
Hypoxia/complications*
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology*
;
Prognosis
;
Machine Learning
3.A systematic review of the safety and tolerability evaluation of enteral nutrition in a prone position with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2023;35(9):968-974
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically review safety and tolerance of enteral nutrition (EN) in a prone position, as well as the risks of increased gastric residual volume (GRV), vomiting, aspiration, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and determine the ways to improve EN tolerance in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
METHODS:
Databases including PubMed, Embase and Wanfang Medical data of the English and Chinese literatures were retrieved up from January 1979 to January 2022 to collet the randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-RCT, and observational studies, concerning safety and tolerance of EN in a prone position with ARDS. All trials must have a minimum of two patient groups, one of which must be prone to ARDS and receive EN. Data searching extracting and quality evaluation were assessed by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.4 software was used for analysis.
RESULTS:
A total of 9 studies were included, including 2 RCTs, 2 non-RCTs, 4 prospective observational studies, and 1 retrospective observational study. The starting and increasing rate of EN were typically well tolerated in the prone position compared to the supine position in patients with ARDS, there was no significant increase in GRV (mL: 95 vs. 110), and the incidence of vomiting was not noticeably higher (0%-35% vs. 33%-57%). The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia with EN was not significantly higher in the prone position than in the supine position in patients with ARDS (6%-35% vs. 15%-24%). Aspiration occurred at a similar rate in patients in the nasogastric tube and post-pyloric feeding groups with EN in patients with ARDS in the prone position (22% vs. 20%). EN tolerability with nasogastric and nasojejunal tubes was similar in prone positions, with no significant difference in EN intolerance incidences (15% vs. 22%). Head elevation (30 degree angle-45 degree angle) improved EN tolerance in the prone position in patients with ARDS, thereby increasing the early EN dose [odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.22-1.08, P = 0.08]. Additionally, prophylactic application of gastrointestinal motility drugs, such as erythromycin, at the start of EN in a prone position significantly improved patients' EN tolerance (OR = 1.14, 95%CI was 0.63-2.05, P = 0.67).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of gastric tube for EN in prone position and similar feeding speed to the supine position in patients with ARDS is safe and well tolerated. The initiation and dosing of EN should not be delayed in the prone position. EN tolerance may be increased by elevating the head of the bed during enteral feeding in a prone position, and gastrointestinal motility medications should be promptly administered with EN initiation in patients with ARDS.
Humans
;
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/etiology*
;
Enteral Nutrition
;
Prone Position
;
Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects*
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology*
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
Observational Studies as Topic
4.Acute respiratory distress syndrome: focusing on secondary injury.
Pan PAN ; Long-Xiang SU ; Da-Wei LIU ; Xiao-Ting WANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2021;134(17):2017-2024
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most common severe diseases seen in the clinical setting. With the continuous exploration of ARDS in recent decades, the understanding of ARDS has improved. ARDS is not a simple lung disease but a clinical syndrome with various etiologies and pathophysiological changes. However, in the intensive care unit, ARDS often occurs a few days after primary lung injury or after a few days of treatment for other severe extrapulmonary diseases. Under such conditions, ARDS often progresses rapidly to severe ARDS and is difficult to treat. The occurrence and development of ARDS in these circumstances are thus not related to primary lung injury; the real cause of ARDS may be the "second hit" caused by inappropriate treatment. In view of the limited effective treatments for ARDS, the strategic focus has shifted to identifying potential or high-risk ARDS patients during the early stages of the disease and implementing treatment strategies aimed at reducing ARDS and related organ failure. Future research should focus on the prevention of ARDS.
Humans
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology*
;
Treatment Outcome
5.Association of different stages of histological chorioamnionitis with respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants with a gestational age of < 32 weeks.
Ran DING ; Qiang CHEN ; Qian-Wei ZHANG ; Qi-Bin SUN ; Dai-Jing WANG ; Ruo-Bing SHAN
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2021;23(3):248-253
OBJECTIVE:
To study the association of different stages of histological chorioamnionitis (HCA) with the incidence rate and severity of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants.
METHODS:
Related data were collected from the infants and their mothers who were treated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, from January 2018 to June 2020. According to the presence or absence of HCA and its stage, the infants were divided into four groups: control (
RESULTS:
Compared with the control and late-stage HCA groups, the early-stage HCA group had a significantly lower incidence rate of placental abruption and a significantly higher rate of prenatal use of antibiotics (
CONCLUSIONS
Early-, middle-, and late-stage HCA can reduce the incidence rate of RDS in preterm infants. HCA stage may not be correlated with RDS severity in preterm infants, which needs to be verified by further research.
Birth Weight
;
Child
;
Chorioamnionitis/epidemiology*
;
Female
;
Gestational Age
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Infant, Premature
;
Pregnancy
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/etiology*
6.Construction of early risk prediction models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.
Ru ZHANG ; Fa-Lin XU ; Wen-Li LI ; Fan-Yue QIN ; Xin-Yun JIN ; Yi ZHANG ; Chen ZHANG ; Chu ZHU
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2021;23(10):994-1001
OBJECTIVES:
To construct risk prediction models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants on postnatal days 3, 7, and 14.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 414 preterm infants, with a gestational age of <32 weeks and a birth weight (BW) of <1 500 g, who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from July 2019 to April 2021. According to the diagnostic criteria for BPD revised in 2018, they were divided into a BPD group with 98 infants and a non-BPD group with 316 infants. The two groups were compared in terms of general status, laboratory examination results, treatment, and complications. The logistic regression model was used to identify the variables associated with BPD. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of models.
RESULTS:
The logistic regression analysis showed that BW, asphyxia, grade III-IV respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), acute chorioamnionitis, interstitial pneumonia, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO
CONCLUSIONS
BW, asphyxia, grade III-IV RDS, acute chorioamnionitis, interstitial pneumonia, FiO
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/etiology*
;
Female
;
Gestational Age
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Infant, Premature
;
Pregnancy
;
Respiration, Artificial
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
;
Retrospective Studies
7.Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome: from basic to clinics.
Protein & Cell 2020;11(10):707-722
The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has occurred in China and around the world. SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with severe pneumonia rapidly develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and die of multiple organ failure. Despite advances in supportive care approaches, ARDS is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapy may be an potential alternative strategy for treating ARDS by targeting the various pathophysiological events of ARDS. By releasing a variety of paracrine factors and extracellular vesicles, MSC can exert anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, anti-microbial, and pro-angiogenic effects, promote bacterial and alveolar fluid clearance, disrupt the pulmonary endothelial and epithelial cell damage, eventually avoiding the lung and distal organ injuries to rescue patients with ARDS. An increasing number of experimental animal studies and early clinical studies verify the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in ARDS. Since low cell engraftment and survival in lung limit MSC therapeutic potentials, several strategies have been developed to enhance their engraftment in the lung and their intrinsic, therapeutic properties. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the mechanisms and optimization of MSC therapy in ARDS and highlighted the potentials and possible barriers of MSC therapy for COVID-19 patients with ARDS.
Adoptive Transfer
;
Alveolar Epithelial Cells
;
pathology
;
Animals
;
Apoptosis
;
Betacoronavirus
;
Body Fluids
;
metabolism
;
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes
;
immunology
;
Clinical Trials as Topic
;
Coinfection
;
prevention & control
;
therapy
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
complications
;
immunology
;
Disease Models, Animal
;
Endothelial Cells
;
pathology
;
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
;
Genetic Therapy
;
methods
;
Genetic Vectors
;
administration & dosage
;
therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Immunity, Innate
;
Inflammation Mediators
;
metabolism
;
Lung
;
pathology
;
physiopathology
;
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
;
methods
;
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
;
physiology
;
Multiple Organ Failure
;
etiology
;
prevention & control
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
complications
;
immunology
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
;
immunology
;
pathology
;
therapy
;
Translational Medical Research
8.A school-aged boy with nephrotic syndrome with cough for one month and shortness of breath for half a month.
Xiao-Lu DENG ; Chun-Guang ZHAO ; Xin-Hua MA ; Xia WANG
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2020;22(12):1326-1330
A boy, aged 6 years and 11 months, was admitted due to nephrotic syndrome for 2 years, cough for 1 month, and shortness of breath for 15 days. The boy had a history of treatment with hormone and immunosuppressant. Chest CT after the onset of cough and shortness of breath showed diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs. Serum (1, 3)-beta-D glucan was tested positive, and the nucleic acid of cytomegalovirus was detected in respiratory secretions. After the anti-fungal and anti-viral treatment, the child improved temporarily but worsened again within a short period of time.
Child
;
Cough/etiology*
;
Cytomegalovirus Infections/therapy*
;
Dyspnea/etiology*
;
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Nephrotic Syndrome/complications*
;
Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/therapy*
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy*
9.Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy.
Jia Xuan XU ; Hong Zhi WANG ; Jun DONG ; Xiao Jie CHEN ; Yong YANG ; Ren Xiong CHEN ; Guo Dong WANG
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2018;50(6):1057-1062
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the incidence and risk factors for the acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after resection of esophageal carcinoma.
METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed 422 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine with esophageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2016 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. ALI/ARDS were diagnosed, the patients were divided into ALI/ARDS group and control group without ALI/ARDS, the differences of clinical features were contrasted between the two groups, and the multivariate Logistic regression modeling was used to identify the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS.
RESULTS:
In the study, 41 ALI/ARDS cases were diagnosed, making up 9.7% (41/422) of all the enrolled patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparisons of the ALI/ARDS group and the control group indicated significant statistical differences in the average length of their hospital stay [(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d, P=0.011], the proportion of the patients who needed mechanical ventilation support [51.2% (21/41) vs. 9.4% (36/381), P<0.001] and in-hospital mortality [31.7% (13/41) vs. 5.0% (19/381), P<0.001]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the patients with ALI/ARDS and without ALI/ARDS in smoking history (P=0.064), preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (P=0.020), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P=0.011), body weight index (BMI) (P=0.044), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (P=0.049) and one lung ventilation duration (P=0.008), while multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC (OR=1.053, P=0.016, 95%CI 1.010-1.098), ASA physical status classification (OR=2.392, P=0.033, 95%CI 1.073-5.335) and one lung ventilation duration (OR=0.994, P=0.028, 95%CI 0.989-0.999) were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.
CONCLUSION
ALI/ARDS was a serious complication in patients undergoing esophagectomy associated with increment in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC, ASA classification and one lung ventilation duration were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy. Carefully assessing the patient before operation, shortening one lung ventilation duration were the key points in preventing ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.
Acute Lung Injury/etiology*
;
Esophagectomy/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Respiration, Artificial
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail