Objective:To investigate the impact of coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) on the long-term prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods:The study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single centre. Patients who successfully underwent elective PCI with pre-and post-PCI caIMR measurements in Peking University First Hospital between August 2013 and December 2020 were included. Then patients were categorised into three groups based on pre-and post-PCI caIMR: post-PCI caIMR<25 U group, pre-PCI caIMR<25 U and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U group, and both pre-and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U group. Collected clinical data of patients, including comorbid diabetes mellitus.The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint, defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularisation. The association between caIMR-based groupings and clinical outcomes was analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.Results:A total of 625 patients who underwent successful elective PCI were included in the study, among whom 294 (47.0%) had stable angina. The age was (64.5±10.1) years, and 440 (70.4%) patients were male. Over a median follow-up of 3.69 (1.80, 5.80) years, 122 patients (19.5%) experienced composite endpoint events. Post-PCI caIMR≥25 U in combination with diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of the composite endpoint compared to those with post-PCI caIMR<25 U and without diabetes mellitus (adjusted HR=2.13, 95% CI 1.17-3.88, P=0.014). In the combined analysis, compared with post-PCI caIMR<25 U group, those with both pre-and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U had higher risks of composite endpoint (adjusted HR=2.01, 95% CI 1.18-3.43, P=0.010) and any revascularisation (adjusted HR=2.12, 95% CI 1.17-3.84, P=0.013). The pre-PCI caIMR<25 U and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U group showed no statistically significant differences in any of the endpoints compared to post-PCI caIMR<25 U group. Conclusions:Integrated pre-and post-procedural assessment of caIMR may enhance risk stratification in patients with coronary heart disease. Persistent coronary microvascular dysfunction present both before and after PCI, as measured by caIMR, serves as an independent risk factor for adverse events in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective PCI.

Objective:To investigate the impact of coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) on the long-term prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods:The study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single centre. Patients who successfully underwent elective PCI with pre-and post-PCI caIMR measurements in Peking University First Hospital between August 2013 and December 2020 were included. Then patients were categorised into three groups based on pre-and post-PCI caIMR: post-PCI caIMR<25 U group, pre-PCI caIMR<25 U and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U group, and both pre-and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U group. Collected clinical data of patients, including comorbid diabetes mellitus.The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint, defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularisation. The association between caIMR-based groupings and clinical outcomes was analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.Results:A total of 625 patients who underwent successful elective PCI were included in the study, among whom 294 (47.0%) had stable angina. The age was (64.5±10.1) years, and 440 (70.4%) patients were male. Over a median follow-up of 3.69 (1.80, 5.80) years, 122 patients (19.5%) experienced composite endpoint events. Post-PCI caIMR≥25 U in combination with diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of the composite endpoint compared to those with post-PCI caIMR<25 U and without diabetes mellitus (adjusted HR=2.13, 95% CI 1.17-3.88, P=0.014). In the combined analysis, compared with post-PCI caIMR<25 U group, those with both pre-and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U had higher risks of composite endpoint (adjusted HR=2.01, 95% CI 1.18-3.43, P=0.010) and any revascularisation (adjusted HR=2.12, 95% CI 1.17-3.84, P=0.013). The pre-PCI caIMR<25 U and post-PCI caIMR≥25 U group showed no statistically significant differences in any of the endpoints compared to post-PCI caIMR<25 U group. Conclusions:Integrated pre-and post-procedural assessment of caIMR may enhance risk stratification in patients with coronary heart disease. Persistent coronary microvascular dysfunction present both before and after PCI, as measured by caIMR, serves as an independent risk factor for adverse events in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective PCI.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the application effect of phased intensive medication education (PIME) on patients after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). MethodsBy convenience sampling method, 60 patients who underwent PCI for the first time in Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from October 2017 to February 2018 were selected and randomly divided into experimental group (n=30) and control group (n=30). The experimental group was educated by PIME, while the control group received conventional medication education. The patients were followed up after discharge. Seven indicators, including medication literacy, medication compliance and exercise tolerance and so on were collected and compared. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the scores of medication literacy between the two groups before intervention (P＞ 0.05). On the day of discharge, 1 month and 3 months after discharge, the scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the scores of compliance between the two groups before intervention (P＞0.05). At 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after discharge, the scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group with statistical differences (P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in exercise tolerance between the two groups before intervention, at discharge and 1 month after discharge (P＞0.05). The experimental group was higher than the control group at 3 months after discharge with a statistical difference (P＜0.01). The decrease of heart rate and systolic blood pressure in the experimental group was greater than that in the control group (P＜ 0.05). One month after discharge, the incidence of adverse medication reactions in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group and the difference was statistically significant (P＜ 0.05). Conclusions PIME can effectively improve patients' medication literacy, medication adherence, safety and effectiveness, which is worthy of promotion.